Davide DB Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 Hi all, Is it a R5C used here? A C70? O neither of the two? ISO 12800 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gt3rs Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 1 hour ago, Davide DB said: Hi all, Is it a R5C used here? A C70? O neither of the two? ISO 12800 To me the camera on the ronin is a Sony and I would guess is A7s III Davide DB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davide DB Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 The cinematography of the frogs part is stunning PannySVHS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davide DB Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 52 minutes ago, gt3rs said: To me the camera on the ronin is a Sony and I would guess is A7s III You are right. It's a Sony. Could be A7SIII or R or A1. Without seeing the upper part, it's hard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Calabros Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 2 hours ago, Davide DB said: Without seeing the upper part, it's hard. You don't need the upper part, its A7siii. Emanuel, PannySVHS and Davide DB 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kye Posted November 19, 2023 Share Posted November 19, 2023 On 11/19/2023 at 3:37 AM, Eric Calabros said: You don't need the upper part, its A7siii. Hot damn! You mean we can shrink the camera bodies by just lopping bits off? Where's my hacksaw!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntblowz Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 Josh did R5C vs FX3 Canon without Clog2 is really limiting the DR. https://youtu.be/4tpBrNbf050?si=YsGJTc6_Zl_995cX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Django Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 Actually his test reveals very similar DR between the two with R5C having way better highlight latitude and FX3 cleaner shadow info. But its worth noting FX3 uses high amount of internal NR whereas you can dial it down on R5C. You can also access Clog2 if you shoot in RAW. So unless you need that 12,500 ISO for like extreme low-light situations, R5C is imo way better than FX3 in almost all categories. The fact FX3 still doesn't even have shutter angle is blasphemy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spinkscapes Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 On 12/17/2023 at 12:17 AM, Django said: Actually his test reveals very similar DR between the two with R5C having way better highlight latitude and FX3 cleaner shadow info. But its worth noting FX3 uses high amount of internal NR whereas you can dial it down on R5C. You can also access Clog2 if you shoot in RAW. So unless you need that 12,500 ISO for like extreme low-light situations, R5C is imo way better than FX3 in almost all categories. The fact FX3 still doesn't even have shutter angle is blasphemy. Plus it doubles as an exceptional stills camera (which is great for me as a backup as a wedding photography camera). Also Josh is quickly becoming one of my favourite Youtubers with his in-depth discussions which aren't dry or boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.