Avenger 2.0
-
Posts
358 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by Avenger 2.0
-
-
If this is true Sony and Panasonic are going to have a real problem with all the pixel peepers going back to Canon.
For us that don't care we can get a good deal for a A7S2, GH5S, S1H or C100ii in the near future...
-
Panasonic GH6
In: Cameras
-
-
7 hours ago, ntblowz said:
M6ii will also get update to 24p early next year
Since it is such a small and compact camera they really need the time to get it squeezed in.
-
And now the new M200 (cropped) 4k has only 24p and no 25p/30p ?
-
12 hours ago, Anaconda_ said:
That's what I'm asking haha...
If you don't have the skills it's better not to open it yourself. From teardown videos it looks rather complicated and it is very easy to completely kill it.
Just use this one with manual lenses. You can still use the viltrox with manual lenses (EF, M42, etc...) to get wider fov. -
-
18 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:
Worse. Less detail, more moire and aliasing.
The DPReview chart of 90D shows you what to expect.
Compare it to the X-T30 or X-T3 and it's even more clear how mushy it is and how much moire there is going on
Yeah, I'm seeing it. 4k is pretty bad indeed, but 1080p looks very good to me (especially in comparison to 7d2/80d and even a bit better then m50).
It almost looks like 1080p is downscaled 4k (or 4k upscaled 1080p :p). Don't see much difference between the two.
-
13 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:
I have original clips but can't be bothered even to share them. Nothing to see here!
Does the M6ii 4k uncropped has worse quality then the EOS R cropped or not?
-
36 minutes ago, gatopardo said:
24p is not that important to me as i live in a PAL country and don't do feature films. Use 25p all the time. But this are the first 4k Canon cameras which image quality video is really lacking. EOS M50 and EOS R are capable of producing very nice creamy image despite the crop. This ones seem to suffer from the poor upscaling. This way there's no point shooting with a Canon any more.
The YouTube video above suggest the M6ii 4k quality is much better and sharper then the M50 or EOS R. So what is it now?
-
12 minutes ago, frankdrebin said:
Any thoughts?
Doesn't look that underexposed to me. Must be fixable (but I'm no expert).
-
You are right, just not with the 24p part. There certainly doesn't need to be any added or different hardware for 24p. Magic Lantern for example can do any framerate you want. It's just a commercial decision that they only included 25p and 30p. Why, nobody knows.
-
2 hours ago, Amazeballs said:
Sure Here it is
Nice, thanks!
-
3 hours ago, SteveV4D said:
I've shot over 50 Weddings with the Pocket 4K. Never let me down. It even got knocked to the floor twice, and kept on recording to the USB drive. When a similar thing happened to my GH5, it shut down and the file was badly corrupted. Best camera I've owned. :). And to think I very nearly cancelled my pre-order last December....
Thanks, good to know. Would you recommend it instead of the GH5 for weddings then?
-
5 hours ago, currensheldon said:
Currently, Black Magic makes cameras that give you a beautiful image with a fantastic codec and menu system at a GREAT price, but everything else is a bit of a disaster.
Indeed. Perfect for a controlled environment where you (can) do retakes. But would never trust them in one-time events like weddings, etc...
-
4 minutes ago, amanieux said:
the only great thing about a6600 you don't even mention is continuous eye AF in video, do you know another camera that can do that ? a f1. 4 closeup with the $289 sigma 30mm will open up the possibility of interview with nearest eye in focus and the rest of the face blurred a very intimate image with cinematic intensity
How about an entire wedding video with only one eye in focus and everything else blurred ?
-
You can find the sigma 10-20mm second hand easy below €200 here. Viltrox not necessary, just saying if he has one it works with this lens.
-
20 minutes ago, fuzzynormal said:
A used Sigma 10-20mm?
Even works fine with the Viltrox speedbooster giving you 7-14mm equivalent.
-
52 minutes ago, Oliver Daniel said:
They must be neglecting PDAF for a reason. I don't think for a second they can't do it. Their cameras are widely accused of this shortfall so they must be listening. I think they feel they've got something better up their sleeve........
Likely patents.
Why doesn't Panasonic release a CXXX style body? Would love those ergonomics, extra buttons, build-in ND's, ...
-
The thing I don't understand is, why with the new camera's (90D, M6II, 250D, etc), do they offer clean 4k HDMI out??? Did Atomos pay them big money to do so?
-
In photography they do the same. Just look at an old 1D from 15 years ago. It has features the 5D4 still doesn't have like specify the exact fps value in custom options, etc...
-
16 hours ago, Django said:
Any word on Kipon about a EF-RF Speedbooster?
Guess that would only work in (video) crop mode which might be too small a market. Maybe if a APS-C sensor RF mount comes out we will see a EF-RF speed booster.
-
Wow those prices. When you thought the 90D / M6 ii were expensive, here comes Sony...
-
32 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:
You can get an EOS RP for that.
But then you lose 4k dpaf. But the 90D remains expensive in comparison. They at least could have included 24p for the price ?
Canon EOS R5 - 8K30p 4K120p
In: Cameras
Posted
Doubt we will see zebra's, waveform monitor, vectorscope, false color, double slot recording, etc... But a simple hdmi monitor/recorder will provide you that.
But indeed see them giving you decent 8k, good dpaf, canon colors, peaking, etc... Will be a good B-cam for C300/500 or A-cam for enthousiasts/vloggers/...