Avenger 2.0
-
Posts
358 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by Avenger 2.0
-
-
To bad the video features are kind of limited compared to the GH5. But looks like the same as G80, 150mbps 4k and 30 min limit.
-
Wouldn't be suprised if they cancelled the orders.
-
Thanks, good price indeed. Hopefully it arrives before brexit
-
6 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said:
On Canon bodies they are of course snappy and accurate without any hunting. On the BMPCC4K I enjoyed the push AF very much with the Panasonic 12-35, specially since it's such a crappy MF. A shame if we can't get the same snappiness with native EF on the P6K.
I guess it depends with which Canon body you compare. The liveview cdaf from 60D, 5D3, 6D, etc will I guess be the same as bmpcc6k. The dpaf from 70D, 80D, 5D4, 6D2 will be way faster.
-
1 hour ago, zerocool22 said:
I still would dump my pocket 4k for 5d iv raw.
You can do 4k with ML with 5D3 right now ?
Kind of feel your pain. Canon dropped the ball with the 5D4. Bad 4k crop & bad codec.
-
5 hours ago, plucas said:
Magic Lantern has perhaps already reached a terminus of sorts. It's a wonderful utility that has allowed us to shoot RAW video on a budget, but we haven't seen a RAW module come to any Canon camera that was released after 2013. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
In essence, the modern DIGIC processors or sensors are much more complex and the brilliant team of developers at ML are only able to develop the software in their spare time.
No doubt Canon has already taken steps to make ML builds more difficult to port to their newer cameras. Filmmakers like Rubidium (Crimson Engine) still often use the 5Diii ML as their C200 B-cam and that's of course bad business for Canon, who'd rather that professionals settle for an EOS R or buy a second Cinema camera.
The biggest problem is there are only a few active developers with not enough time. They already found ways to upload code to new camera's (M50, 80D, 5D4, etc) and are waiting for other developers to port existing code to them. I think the problem is there isn't that much demand as before because now we have the BMPCC and such.
-
-
The Canon 24-105mm f/4.0 L lens just isn't a sharp lens. Bought my first one second hand and thought it was just too used because at 100% the image most of the time looked slight out of focus. Sold it and bought a new 24-105mm f/4.0 ii L and this one is even worse. Bought the Sigma 24-105mm f/4.0 and it is way sharper. The only good thing about the Canon is that it's weather proof when needed. Maybe for video still good, but for photography not sharp enough for professional use.
-
On 8/10/2019 at 10:32 PM, mercer said:
RMC Tokina 17mm f/3.5?
Thanks, found it for 99 euro in good condition ?
- thephoenix and mercer
-
2
-
9 minutes ago, leslie said:
maybe it comes down to licensing fees, whoever holds the rf mount may have been holding out for top dollar or just wanted to have it all to themselves. Im just speculating, but its safe to say ef would have been the cheaper option. People will jump on a 6k camera for $2500 make it $3000 and quite a few are going to think about it for a bit longer
Indeed. One may use EF for free and reverse engineer it. But RF may require expensive license fees.
-
8 hours ago, Caleb Genheimer said:
Also, I didn’t think they could possibly update the Pocket and make it MORE of an ugly duckling.
Somehow, they managed to do exactly that.
True. By blackmagic this clearly is seen as a tool. No effort was done in esthetic design.
-
-
22 hours ago, forofilms said:
Will Canon IS be supported?
Doesn't it work on the 4k already?
-
2 hours ago, Adam Kuźniar said:
It's like that. No such thing as "best color science". Color is subjective.
Indeed, that's true. That's why aliens prefere the green Sony skin tones.
-
4 minutes ago, chadandreo said:
Any word on AF?
DPAF, Contrast, etc.
Guess just contrast detect autofocus.
-
When the BMPCC 6K is everywhere in stock they probably will announce the BMPCC 8K with full-frame sensor ?
-
3 minutes ago, Adam Kuźniar said:
You absolutely can, there's a speedbooster for the Ursa mini pro by the guy called lucadapters.
Didn't know that. Mounted inside, smart!
-
4 minutes ago, Lars Steenhoff said:
6k Ef mount ?
need an new speedbooster
If it's an EF mount, you can't use a speedbooster.
-
52 minutes ago, Esguelha said:
Yeah, me too. Especially since shipping the camera internationally would cost me more than the camera itself.
Same here, kind of fell in love with it. Would break my heart to give it away. If next time this rule is removed, I'm in.
-
3 hours ago, Shell64 said:
Does the 17-50 have a manual appetite ring? I want to get it with a manual speed booster to save $$
This lens has killer range at 2.8, and for $300, WOW
No it doesn't. Get the Viltrox EF-M2, it works perfect with the 17-50mm f2.8 and will give you an equivalent 24-70mm f2.0
-
1 hour ago, Shell64 said:
I meant the 17-50 2.8 not 17-35 (don’t think that lens exists lol).
Looks like it does ?
The sigma 17-50 2.8 is a nice lens, find it better then the tamron one (had both). Went now for the sigma 18-35 1.8, but it is much more expensive and heavy.
-
Only advantage of 50D is that it is weather proof, has longer battery life and is more robust if you need that.
-
It does have 2.8-4.0 aperture, so not really that great for video.
-
1 hour ago, Skip77 said:
Canon will bounce back.
I'm sure they are here to stay (certainly with pro's). Their new RF lens line-up shows what they are best at. Just hope they also release some affordable lenses for the not-pro's ? Video features will always be a pain with Canon in their mirrorless or dslr. Don't see they changing much in the future.
Panasonic G9 £599 At Amazon
In: Cameras
Posted
But are the time limits there to protect from overheating or just to not hurt the GH5? In other words can you restart video all day without it overheating like the GH5?