Adept

I had crane m2 and returned it. It was extremely difficult to balance (even iPhone pro and gx85), because of its small arms. Subsequently, I purchased Ronin SC and have no problems with balancing.

Dear Andy, welcome back! Hope you are well. If possible, please share your new experience and findings. Best,

Thank you for your reply. Andy was a great source of k-h. Do you have any link to his new travel videos and finalised shot we heard about in 2016-17? I could not google it up.

Hi, What happened with Andy Lee, the master of, among others, G7? Best,

Hi-hat benro may be an answer.

Unfortunately, manual focus on N 50 1.8 AFD is horrible. PL 42.5 is much more comfortable. For the avoidance of doubt, P 35-100 above is a darker version 4-5.6.

Here is a quick comparison made on GX85 SOOC between: Panaleica 8-18 at 8 2.8 Panasonic 12-32 at 12 3.5 Nikon 14-24 + Lensturbo at 14 2.8

Hi, here is a quick comparison made on GX85 SOOC between: Panasonic 12-32 at 32mm 5.6 Panasonic 35-100 at 35mm 4 PanaLeica 42.5 at 1.2 Nikon 50 1.8D + lensturbo at 1.8

Dear Philip, thank you for good news. Do you have any official roadmap were this information stems from. Thank you.

I am considering a purchase of P 42.5 1.7 or PL 42.5 1.2 Nocticron. Do you know whether these lenses will be compatible Dual IS 2 on GH5 or there will be a mark ii version? Thank you.

If somebody missed it, here it is: https://www.dpreview.com/interviews/4663212665/interview-with-three-time-oscar-winning-cinematographer-emmanuel-lubezki

Dear John, In your prospective test please distinguish when you use zeiss cinema lenses and when olympus pro lensing, maybe even compare these sets. I look forward to seeing how much cinematic look you can get from m43. This because i am prejudiced against investing in native m43 glass best,

According to imbd.com, Jason Bourne movie (2016) was shoot on, inter alia, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 (Morpheus TLS). Tradition continues:)

There are virtually no information about matching Nikkor 14-24 2.8 with speedboosters/focal reducers. Thus, I would like to share with my rough, unscientific and spontaneous test: OOC .jpg, handheld, GX80, Standard -3/-0/-0/-3. This is a comparison between: (a) Nikkor 14-24 at 14 mm, 2.8 + Mitakon Lens Turbo v.2 vs. (b) Lumix kit lens 12-32 at 12 mm, 3.5. IMHO there is a clear difference between these two sets, including that Nikkor is wider I would be more than happy to hear your thoughts. Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 I have almost no focus peaking when lens turbo is on GX80. Please let me know what I should change to improve this. There is no problem with focus peaking when using the kit lens with MF mode on. Although there is no major play between Lens Turbo and GX80, I am considering Fotga as a cheap and small lens-support solution. Do you have any other recommendation? PS. IBIS with GX80+adapted lens is really good.

Do you have any experience with matching Nikkor 14-24 2.8 with Speedbooster for Sony E mount (or other APS-C)? I could not find any user's reports/test on the Internet. I only read that pairing UWA with Speedbooster can lead to dissapointing results. Any feedback on this will be very much appreciated. BTW. I also wonder why this lens (N 14-24) is relatively unpopular on this forum.