Jump to content

Adept

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Adept last won the day on May 1 2018

Adept had the most liked content!

About Adept

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Adept

    Lenses

    Unfortunately, manual focus on N 50 1.8 AFD is horrible. PL 42.5 is much more comfortable. For the avoidance of doubt, P 35-100 above is a darker version 4-5.6.
  2. Here is a quick comparison made on GX85 SOOC between: Panaleica 8-18 at 8 2.8 Panasonic 12-32 at 12 3.5 Nikon 14-24 + Lensturbo at 14 2.8
  3. Adept

    Lenses

    Hi, here is a quick comparison made on GX85 SOOC between: Panasonic 12-32 at 32mm 5.6 Panasonic 35-100 at 35mm 4 PanaLeica 42.5 at 1.2 Nikon 50 1.8D + lensturbo at 1.8
  4. Dear Philip, thank you for good news. Do you have any official roadmap were this information stems from. Thank you.
  5. I am considering a purchase of P 42.5 1.7 or PL 42.5 1.2 Nocticron. Do you know whether these lenses will be compatible Dual IS 2 on GH5 or there will be a mark ii version? Thank you.
  6. If somebody missed it, here it is: https://www.dpreview.com/interviews/4663212665/interview-with-three-time-oscar-winning-cinematographer-emmanuel-lubezki
  7. Dear John, In your prospective test please distinguish when you use zeiss cinema lenses and when olympus pro lensing, maybe even compare these sets. I look forward to seeing how much cinematic look you can get from m43. This because i am prejudiced against investing in native m43 glass best,
  8. Adept

    Lenses

    According to imbd.com, Jason Bourne movie (2016) was shoot on, inter alia, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 (Morpheus TLS). Tradition continues:)
  9. There are virtually no information about matching Nikkor 14-24 2.8 with speedboosters/focal reducers. Thus, I would like to share with my rough, unscientific and spontaneous test: OOC .jpg, handheld, GX80, Standard -3/-0/-0/-3. This is a comparison between: (a) Nikkor 14-24 at 14 mm, 2.8 + Mitakon Lens Turbo v.2 vs. (b) Lumix kit lens 12-32 at 12 mm, 3.5. IMHO there is a clear difference between these two sets, including that Nikkor is wider I would be more than happy to hear your thoughts. Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 I have almost no focus peaking when lens turbo is on GX80. Please let me know what I should change to improve this. There is no problem with focus peaking when using the kit lens with MF mode on. Although there is no major play between Lens Turbo and GX80, I am considering Fotga as a cheap and small lens-support solution. Do you have any other recommendation? PS. IBIS with GX80+adapted lens is really good.
  10. Do you have any experience with matching Nikkor 14-24 2.8 with Speedbooster for Sony E mount (or other APS-C)? I could not find any user's reports/test on the Internet. I only read that pairing UWA with Speedbooster can lead to dissapointing results. Any feedback on this will be very much appreciated. BTW. I also wonder why this lens (N 14-24) is relatively unpopular on this forum.
×
×
  • Create New...