Video Hummus

On 6/11/2025 at 6:08 AM, Andrew Reid said:

Flexible Colour Picture Controls.

I have been waiting a long time for this. A Z6 III feature, first the Zf got it, now the Z8.

It's effectively a full grading suite on-camera, bringing in-camera colour profiles far ahead of what Nikon offered before.

The latest NX Studio Software used to create profiles and export to camera.

It is much more advanced than the Canon Picture Profile creator software too.

As good as having real-time LUTs.

Pixel Shift + Focus Shift at same time is also pretty mega. Like having a 200MP medium format camera for macro, close-ups and product shots.

They also fixed their horrible n-log view assist. Nikon is really killing lately with their value for money, firmware, and camera offerings.

I've owned and used both of these cameras. I had the R5C when it first came out. R5C is dead in the water for me because of the RF lens mount lock-out. It's one of the main reasons I left RF. So, get the Z8. I use a Z8 with 400mm f/4.5 with and without the 1.4x TC and love it. 

If telephoto lenses are important to you than Nikon has perhaps the best lineup right now with the Z mount. They are the only ones that have the holy grail end-game of telephoto lenses: 400mm f/2.8 and 600mm f/4 both with built-in TC.

They also have cheaper and excellent options: 180-600 f/4.5-5.6 being a standout value proposition. The 400mm f/4.5, 600mm f/6.3, and 800mm f/6.3 are still kinda unmatched.

Z mount has some cool third party lens options and growing. Nikon has been slower to release non telephoto Z mount but they are doing it. The Z 28-135mm f/4 PZ being their latest.

The Z8 is my favorite camera I've used in the past 8 years: A7III, GH5S, R5, R5C, X-H2S. I've shot some of my favorite photos with the X-H2S and am very fond of that camera but the Z8 performs so much better has a hybrid camera.

I'm also really excited to see what Nikon does with their RED acquisition and Z mount. I think there are exciting products coming from Nikon.

On 5/29/2025 at 12:27 AM, newfoundmass said:

He also teases that they've got some exciting things down the pipeline.

It involves their partner and I'm not talking about Leica. RED going down market and Sony's success with VENICE has stirred up some unlikely partnership collabs.

It started with the YT AI slop science channels.

It has progressed to AI generated "Let's Play" slop content for children.

They WILL start using it to make commercials...

...then move on to making kids shows for your kids iPads so you can go to work and forget about parenting...

...then endless Netflix AI slop TV shows for the parents...

...parents that went in to debt to go to college but didn't learn anything because they used chatGPT to write their papers and get their grades...

...who then go into critical jobs without knowing jack shit...

...which they will then lean heavily on chatGPT to do their jobs (because that's what they learned in college).

The lucky ones will die in the next drone war powered by Anduril.

On another note…

Panasonic needs to release a f/2.8 PZ lens. If Fujifilm can do a 28-180 f/4 surely Panasonic could do a MFT 12-150 f/2.8

Panasonic product releases perplex me.

March 2019 - S1/R flopped because they released the much smaller, cheaper, and functionally the same…

September 2020 - S5 the Sony’fied version of Panasonics FF. Still no PDAF. Sales probably OK.

February 2022 - GH6: quirky, no PDAF. Didn’t sell well because…

January 2023 - S5II with PDAF and FF. mFT iS DeAd!

June 2023 - GH7 with PDAF, improved sensor over GH6 (less quirks cleaner image), internal everything kitchen sink!

The S1H should be slotted in there in 2019 but I left it out because it really was a niche product. It did however have a huge impact on future camera designs: mainly the GH6 and S5IIX.

I suspect we will see a S2H soon to continue the cycle of shooting your own cameras in the foot. 

31 minutes ago, independent said:

Wow. Industry disrupting actually. Nikon stole the competitive advantage of Red’s ridiculous patent. I’m wondering how fast they can implement this—how much time I have to liquidate my canon gear. 

A few years. I have been disappointed with Canon’s third party lens fiasco, lack of mid-range quality L-glass, and some other things. My R5C is sold off. I kept the R5 for photos but might sell that off.

It says “wholly-owned subsidiary” of Nikon. So my guess is key technology will trickle from Red to Nikon (global shutter sensors, raw compression on high end Nikon gear, etc…) Red probably continue to do what they do but with Z-mount ecosystem integration.

I also wonder if this is a way for Nikon to break free from Sony Semi-conductor in a way with global sensor technology, which seems to be the direction the industry is going. 

Big moves against Canon. This has to be related in someway to the settlement as it was extremely hush-hush.

The corporate culture couldn’t be more different between the companies. Very interesting. I think they will be run separate with some co-branding happening here and there and of course technology sharing.

Red fanboy panties will be twisted hard if Nikon is slapped on their camera. 

I have the R5C and the R5 and I prefer the R5C setup over the always on IBIS in the R5 for video. At least with the RF 24-70 the OIS + EIS combo has worked amazingly well for hand held static and controlled handheld pans and tilts in my experience.

IBIS wobble is horrible. I come to really notice it and hate it.

10 hours ago, gt3rs said:

In what settings?

Fully charged lp-e6nh in XF-AVC shows 67min 

LP-E6NH give me on average about 30-35 minutes of actual record time with occasional waveform and false color usage, 4K XF-AFC, Continuous AF, Lens IS. If you are running and gunning you can use the media button hack and extend standby battery life considerably probably even more if you flick the IS Off on the lens as well.

On 7/28/2022 at 1:37 PM, Ty Harper said:

Anyone on here with R5C experience that can tell me how the battery life compares to say a 5D MKIII?

It sucks ass.

- A R5C owner

I enjoy using the camera though and just carry 3x more batteries with me than if using just my R5. You can rig and shoot for hours but I don't like using cables if I don't have too. I would have gotten a C70 but would prefer FF with RF glass I have.

On 7/22/2022 at 5:25 PM, Andrew Reid said:

So it was a fake timer then.

It seems so. Kinda shady, for sure. Although the camera and cards become really hot. I would say the CFExpress becomes so hot it can cause burns if taken out of the camera too fast.

On 7/22/2022 at 8:32 AM, PannySVHS said:

R5 in 8K RAW has less latitude in the shadows than a Lumix S5 in downsampled 4K, has half the battery life, triple the price of the S5. Worlds best camera it is not, though for your needs it might be of course. But that I wouldnt be able to know, of course.:) Now let´s test the camera running in the sun of current climate change days. I bet it will not look good, since the hardware is the same, with lack of any kind of sufficient cooling. @FHDcrew

Class leading latitude in the shadows by the Lumix S5. R5 has impressive resolution and looks great up to ETTR -5.

I would say the R5 does respectably well for a 45MP FSI sensor compared to those other cameras in that test. S5 definitely is a goat, if you don't need reliable video AF.

I really, really want a XC15 style camera with internal ND and a newer 1" sensor with 10-bit CLOG3. If they could improve the lens and make it a 24-240 f/2.8-4...I think it would be a killer little "bridge" cinema camera for pretty much anything.

I have a R5C and I have been enjoying the 3K s16 RAW mode on the RF 24-70 and especially on the RF 70-200. But honestly it renewed my crazy want for a new XC style camera even more.

Fuck it. I'm going to rent a XC10 next month and pretend its what I want 🙂

7 hours ago, KnightsFan said:

They just applied existing algorithms to bayer data, the way photo cameras did, instead of RGB data.

This is it.

All the other language about "greater than 23fps" and "4K or higher" or "internal, visually lossless" is all written to broaden the patent intentionally as a, in my opinion, blatant "idea" smash and grab.

They only came up with a method and instead they got a patent for essentially: "visually lossless compressed bayer data in a camera at greater than 23fps and 4K and up resolution".

Ford invented a novel form of locomotion via a box ("vehicle") with 4 or more wheels, powered by an internal combustion engine (as described in prior patent XYZ), moving at speeds greater than 23mph.

Ford is calling it a "motorized vehicle" and will sue anybody that tries to use wheels and internal combustion engines to go faster than 23mph.

Looks like their new LiDAR device on the top of that picture.

I was actually interested in a Pocket 3 for various things. It does so much better than a GoPro/Action in lower light conditions since it stabilizes with a gimbal and not electronically with fast shutter.

My guess if there is a pocket 3 it will have the Mini 3 Pro sensor and gimbal.

I only see LUMIX surviving if they implement PDAF on par with Olympus or better. That is the bottom line. It's 2022 and every camera out there worth a damn is track focusing fairly well (except Fujifilm).

I always wondered what exactly Leica contributed to the L-mount alliance except for the mount. They jointly (perhaps) help with development of the LUMIX PL lenses but beyond that Leica SL and SL2 internals are all from Panasonic with the color engine done by Leica.

Perhaps Leica agrees to invest more of their profit from their $7000 re-skinned S1R into the alliance going forward. 

ProRes internal is great momentum going forward. Seems like more and more companies are adding it.

IBIS looks like it is not the best even just static hand holding. Not sure what is going on there.

I've seen a lot of people complain about CF Express being expensive in reviews. You can get a Angelbird 512GB card that will handle 8K for $179. Prograde 256GB SD card is 62% more expensive for half the space.

Prograde 256 SD   = $1.12/GB
Angelbird 512 CFX = 0.34/GB
Angelbird 1TB CFX = 0.48/GB
Angelbird 2TB CFX = 0.48/GB
Angelbird 4TB CFX = 0.45/GB

4 hours ago, mercer said:

I honestly don't understand how people who create things get angry with a company that created something and want to protect their work.

If you went online and found someone on YouTube that decided to use one of your videos and put their name on it, I'm sure you would flag it.

That's entirely different to a highly nuanced technology discussion.

11 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

It may sound excessively broad now, but someone has to be first with the round wheels and going over 50mph.

Not defending RED, just think there is probably a valid reason why Graeme's work keeps beating a lot of big companies in expensive patent lawsuits.

Where was the almighty Sony in 2005 with their lossless compressed RAW codec?

I'm not doubting the work of Graeme's work. Patent the hell out of it. But they can't claim they have exclusive rights to "'visually lossless' compressed data derived from raw, stored in camera memory at greater than 23 fps."

Precisely define visually lossless. Precisely define "in-camera". Precisely define "data". RAW Bayer CFA? What is stopping Fuji from using its X-Trans sensor layout (not bayer) and doing the same thing? Can they sue Fuji for that? Does RED's patent apply to every possible sensor layout not invented by them because they have patents over words like "camera", "raw", "data", "compression"?

There are lots of patents for data compression 'methodologies', which is what Graeme's work truly is, as applied to cameras. He did not invent "camera", "raw", "data", or "compression", or "greater than 23fps capture".

35 minutes ago, TomTheDP said:

RED is sometimes used on big production

So I guess dealing with 1:1 4.6K RAW is worth it over using a RED camera just for the compressed RAW.

I have no problem with RED's innovation and them making money off it and protecting it. 

However, the way that patent is written is complete and utter bullshit. It's like someone claiming they have exclusive rights to any vehicle using round wheels going over 50mph.  It's excessively broad.

If RED's compressed RAW matters so much why is everybody who has the money shooting on ARRI cameras?

On 2/24/2022 at 11:07 PM, newfoundmass said:

Things seem so bleak right now. 

yeah.

23 hours ago, sanveer said:

So it isn't a Sony sensor for a change(?). It wouldn't be TowerJazz Semiconductor/ Tower Semi, I am guessing, either. Like someone on some rumours blog suggested (photorumors/ 43rumors?), it's probably an ONSemi sensor.

There isn't any 25MP MFT sensor leak or Information of any kind. Usually there is some kind of Sony product paper out there. So my guess was it could be manufactured by Canon. Why? It's most probably BSI and it has a form of DGO of some derivative. Unless Canon isn't manufacturing their own BSI sensors? Is the sensor in the R3 a Canon manufactured sensor or Sony (there were rumors they were perhaps having Sony do the fab)?

On Semi doesn't have any 4/3 sensors listed on their product page. I doubt they are the provider.

That leaves Samsung as a possibility.

10 hours ago, Davide DB said:

BTW this guy tests and uses a bunch of gear but basically he is a Sony A7 guys. 

Well, by his own admission, GH6 images are way better under most conditions. While images sucks for both cameras at 6400 already, GH6 surrenders to A7SIII at ISO 12800.

Repeat with me: I - S - O  1 - 2 - 8 - 0 - 0

my question is: who shoot at ISO 12800?

Hereafter some bookmarks for GH6 Vs A7SIII:

• 9:05 onwards GH6 resolution is better.
• 15:20 onwards ISO test. GH6 wins hands down up to ISO 6400.
• 27:00 onwards DR test. Again GH6 is better.

I feel like the A7SIII was hyped to the max but it honestly performs pretty badly between its native ISOs. Kinda weak codec mushy stuff as well. Side by side against the GH6 it looks like crap as far as useable detail. GH6 has the detail without being over-sharp looking. Honestly, the image looks pretty damn good. I wish it had better AF because it would be on my shortlist.

What in the actual fuck