Dunjoye

Scary stuff.
Glad you got it sorted.
I was a victim of something mysteriously draining my bank account recently myself and here I am on my to tell my wife that our account must have been hacked.

Film convert +  Richmond Park or Brighton seas front

Shot in UHD Prores 422, with a mix of 23.98 and 60fps, slightly graded in DaVinci Resolve. ISO 400 to 3200. Lumix 12-35mm 2.8.
 
 

I don't know if this has been shown??
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-mHizBLaMk
This ca, is pretty decent

I agree. 
The problem with a lot of these cameras is people want Log and flat profile but really don't have a clue on how to treat these files.

I agree. 
The problem with a lot of these cameras is people want Log and flat profile but really don't have a clue on how to treat these files.

It’s here...
 

Looks very decent. Golden Hour obviously. Regardless. 
 

Looks very decent. Golden Hour obviously. Regardless. 
 

Looks very decent. Golden Hour obviously. Regardless. 
 

The way I see it is all cameras shoot raw. But that raw image is then processed in camera... this has varying degrees of success. Sometimes the option is given for minimal processing (log). But if the camera can process the image to be lovely in camera then the need for raw is removed.
This camera is surprisingly good. 

sorry if posted already 
 

sorry if posted already 
 

Well @Oliver Daniel proved that with his Show Reel thread. Look at all the cameras he used. Most are cameras you can buy for peanuts right now. It is talent and skill more than camera for sure. I venture to say maybe the editing skills now might outweigh shooting skills in the mix of things with cameras as good as they are now.

They will sell more BM cameras and more copies of BM Davinci Resolve.

12:1 compression

Footage showing the raw codec 

Yes it can import LUTs.

So much salt clouded in people's responses. Funny how things change in a shot space of a week

All subjective.
Don't think it's rubbish.
When you post clips  skin tones on the GX thread. I often wonder "what is the point? " but  each to their own

All subjective.
Don't think it's rubbish.
When you post clips  skin tones on the GX thread. I often wonder "what is the point? " but  each to their own

So much salt clouded in people's responses. Funny how things change in a shot space of a week

The problem I am having with all of the negative nancy’s around here is that they live in such a bubble. As said ad nauseum, sure nobody WANTS the crop, but the camera has it. If it isn’t your cup of tea, COOL! But nobody has said the image looks bad. Because so far, everything I’ve seen from the camera looks great. A thick image with great AF and great colors. People live in such bubbles here. If any of you were forced to shoot with it and forced to deal with the crop, I’m sure you guys would get amazing results. 

God I hope this place doesn't become somewhere that treats every professional who gets a pre-production model of a camera as being a shill. Trump like.