Nikkor

Your posts are a waste of everyone's time here.

Wow those videos are looking great. Man I am glad I can't afford to make all these decisions on which one to buy LoL.

Nah its accurate. Believe me. Im a Sony fanboy and Fuji shooter. I review all of them.
If I review a Sony all is well.
If I review a Fuji I get attacked by Sony Fanboys.
If I review a Pentax or Nikon I'm attacked by Sony and Fuji Fanboys.
If I review a Canon... all hell breaks loose since even Sony Walkman fanboys attack.
I base this on receiving and reading 26 090 comments over the last couple of years. Just visit any forum and see for yourself. For example checkout the thread about the EOS-R on EOSHD.
 
 
 
After my 6Dmkii review I had to block some really vicious people that weren't attacking just me but also people commenting on the video.
And not about specs. We are talking threats and in general things that would lead to a punch in the face irl.
The weirdest thing was they weren't all anonymous. They actually used their business accounts...freelancers, production house employees using their official accounts... 

The GM isn't a small lens, but that's ok with me if the IQ is great. My FE 28/2 gets a lot of use. And I always have a 24-70 and 85/1.8. One lens that potentially covers most of that makes my life as a travel shooter lot easier. But a f/2 zoom with -6ev AF, that sounds like a great walk around kit. I could carry the 28-70, a UWA and the 50 for everything but wildlife, and obviously Canon has plenty of glass to cover those needs. We already know Canon's touchscreen will be better than most of the competition. Lots to like there.
What a crazy few weeks this is shaping up to be, I can't remember a time where so many huge announcements were made.
Chris

ugh can't keep up anymore

Use google.
According to nikon these lenses have better mtfs than the 105 1.4 which is one if not the sharpest lens they tested at lensrentals, after seeing that I really must think hard to either go fuji gfx or this...
https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/z-mount/z_24-70mmf4s/spec.htm
https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/z-mount/z_50mmf18s/spec.htm
https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/z-mount/z_35mmf18s/spec.htm
for comparison nikons own mtf for the 105 1.4
https://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/f-mount/singlefocal/Telephoto/af-s_105mmf_14e_ed/index.htm
lenserentals test: 
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/11/nikon-105mm-f1-4-e-mtf-bench-tests/
So if you guys know a thing or two about lenses you know this is some serious shit. Just look at that kit zoom lens being sharper than most DSLR prime lens lineups...

4k/30p without crop but DPAF disabled ?  #FML

You guys aren't paying attention to the S line lenses, from what I have seen they render aberration free from edge to edge with an extreme creamy rendering without being too contrasty, until now you had to buy cine zeiss master primes for that, now you can have it for 900$. No wonder they made the flange distance so short, you can only use them on their bodies.

Your posts are a waste of everyone's time here.

Old white male in South East Asia, I'm not going to state the obvious.

Old white male in South East Asia, I'm not going to state the obvious.

You guys aren't paying attention to the S line lenses, from what I have seen they render aberration free from edge to edge with an extreme creamy rendering without being too contrasty, until now you had to buy cine zeiss master primes for that, now you can have it for 900$. No wonder they made the flange distance so short, you can only use them on their bodies.

Your posts are a waste of everyone's time here.

Old white male in South East Asia, I'm not going to state the obvious.

Old white male in South East Asia, I'm not going to state the obvious.

Your posts are a waste of everyone's time here.

That guy is a Moron, he has been dishing Nikon since day one in this thread. He said with absolute certainty that Nikon will never be able to produce a camera to compete with Sony Mirror Less. That was one month ago, having not seen anything, just his analysis. As we can see today he is completely wrong, they have at least matched the Sony third gen mirrotless, but in many ways outdone it. The Z6 kills the A73, better viewfinder, better LCD, 10 bit video, build quality etc. The only thing that is still contentious is the AF which DRreview who had some time with the Beta Z7 said was better than the Sony's. 
That's what Dpreview had to say "Autofocus in video is up there with the best. Tracking and refocusing on subjectives is intuitive and reliable... besting what Canon and Sony offer"
https://***URL removed***/reviews/nikon-z7-first-impressions-review/6
And I am sure, he who has not used the camera will come to patronize us.

Fuji film simulation in 10bit. Yes please.
I bet the AF will be pretty handy as well.
Still enjoying X-H1.
Personally I would be tempted to wait for the update to that rather than X-T3 though.

I've found in France that if you buy a local sim like Orange then its ok but if you are roaming from another country they connect you to this special version of their network....

Nikon 70-200 VR version 1. Creamy goodness! Going for low prices right now, I got a mint copy for $750.

Get the new Nikon Z6

They should make a waterproof version  

A mockup with the 44x33sensor.

Eventually it's going to happen, but I don't think the first version will get it.

No posts about this at SAR, lololol

That's not what a large mount is about.You don't need a big mount to make f0.95 lenses, that's only true for long register distances.
A big mount gives you stable support for larger lens weight, and you can make large optics close to the sensor that fix the problems digital sensors have with very low angle rays.
Time will tell.

IMHO, the adapter thing will be nice if you have lot 's of long lenses, but for anything under 80mm people will go for z mount lenses and dump their old stuff on ebay, great news for poor photographers