ntblowz

Look at this photo, how much space can sensor move around without being blocked by the mount?

Actually larger mass should be able to stable much better than smaller mass, look how smooth Ronin is vs tiny Osmo.. no up down walking bounce for starter. I think the small diameter of E-Mount is the key to blame, look at how much space can it move around vs M43 sensor inside their mount (like literally touching the border of the mount for E mount), hence I have a feeling Nikon Z mount will have good advantage here for IBIS. I am waiting to see how Nikons mirrorless will offer, if it have good IBIS and video spec/quality is not too far off I will be ditching my A7III pretty soon!

Pretty good chance there will be 8K for M43 by 2020.. smaller sensor size do have advantage on readout speed and thermal management.

I was looking at 85mm 1.8, but now saw a batis 135mm at not too bad price.. decisions!

Since all my lens are really quiet with AF and fast so when I tried the 50mm FE 1.8 (want to save bucks too) at store it stick out like sore thumb, well i guess we all have different standards. (the Rokinon is too noisy for me as well.)

Same for Olympus 43 system... I guess this is the beginning the end of F mount? Nikon FT-1 works like using native lens on the Nikon 1 7 years ago, so they already have the technology to do that.

Sony FE 50mm 1.8 is POS.. slow AF and loud noise, I think you mistaken for the Zeiss 55mm 1.8 which is slient and fast.. for just 4X the price.

Yeah, consider bigger mass should be more stable than smaller mass you would think ibis should be piece of cake for Sony but noooo. (Gimbal on ronin is much more stable than osmo, but opposite on stabilising on camera sensor? That doesn’t make sense) I think the small diameter of the e-mount actually hurt Sony in the long run.

Man pretty excited! A bunch of my Nikon photoshooter friends will be really excited about this.

Yeah, telephotos lens much smaller, cheaper and lighter on M43 system. ($12K 400mm FOV lens anyone?)

FS5 looks like can be had for $3000ish.. so that only 2x the price. The electronic ND is really helpful. This guy really utilize his FS5 to the best potential But it does come down to what you need and what not.

The voice sounded like male pretend to be female?

or P4A like I do

https://www.droningon.co/2018/07/06/dji-mavic-pro-2-makes-first-appearance/ The camera/gimbal unit is removable, so like gopro karma it can be used on osmo?

Man either You are undercover Sony agent or shareholders or fanatics, reading you post always amuse me lol Anyway I predict a7s3 coming autumn 18 in that thread, I wonder if that still holds or get pushed for winter release

https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr4-first-serious-sony-a7siii-specs-4k60p-and-hdr-video/ 4k60p and HDR, no mention of AF, I guess still CDAF based for maximum quality

Still no touchscreen on m5a.. seriously?

Well same thing have been said to Sony TV, Walkman etc back then.. Nokia, blockbuster too I guess? ?

I think some people tend to think for manufacturer way too much, its not they are giving you the profit they earned, or help you with your business in anyway beside just selling you the camera.

If you want full Sony experience native lens is the way to go! 3rd party & adapter lens sometimes can drive you mad with those little glitches/imperfection.

Since I am that guy who got hired to fly drone so a P4A is more logical to me (some fly me across the country to fly drone), at least P4A look less toy like than Mavic Pro which I sold (or Air/Spark which definitely look like toy). My previous drone is Inspire 1 with X5 which is a real hassle to carry to remote location. And Mavic Pro II is rumored to be more heavier/bigger than Mavic Pro that will make mobility even less, may be Mavic Pro III will finally have 1" sensor in a more reasonable size/weight?

Since mavic ii will come with 1/1.7” sensor I bought p4a with 1” sensor for much cheaper price

Hopefully the up coming EOS M5 II with 28mp doesnt crop in 4K and with PDAF

If A7SIII have Venice Colour then I am interested for sure.

If their FHD is like C100 quality then it will be a big selling point Sony’s FHD is pretty soft their in mirrorless except a7s/2 or the old a6000/5100