Jump to content

Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

GH2 ISO tests: Rethinking the ISO bug & ISO 320 cleaner than ISO 160?

gh2 iso test tests flowmotion

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 12 September 2012 - 12:52 PM

It's the eleventh hour for the GH2, but it will still be a few months before I have its replacement in my hands so I am still trying to get the best possible performance out of it. And I'd still like to hang onto it as a B-cam, but not until I work some issues out.

I did a full-range ISO test of my GH2 with the Flowmotion 2.02 settings, starting at 12800 and working my way down to 160. I did this after reading a little more about the GH2 ISO bug. Initially, I had read that if you wanted to use ISOs 320, 640 or 1250, you had to switch the camera on and first go to any higher ISO, and then back to one of these three to minimize noise. Then I did some more reading on Personal-View and apparently what you want to do is go to the next ISO increment up, and then back down to the desired setting (so if you want ISO 320, go to ISO 400, then back to 320; if you want 640, go to 800, then back to 640). This seemed to result in a MUCH cleaner image than my initial tests with the first image. The footage is pretty usable up to ISO 1250, at least with the Flowmotion hack.

What really surprised me was this:

Posted Image
ISO 160
Flowmotion 2.02
Noise enhanced for visibility
500% crop


Posted Image
ISO 320
Flowmotion 2.02
Noise enhanced for visibility
500% crop


This tells me that working around the ISO bug as I have talked about above, ISO 320 is actually much cleaner than 160. In fact, it's the cleanest ISO (at least with this hack on my camera).

Thoughts?
  • nahua, Francisco RĂ­os, KarimNassar and 1 other like this

#2 Germy1979

Germy1979

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 572 posts

Posted 12 September 2012 - 07:45 PM

I have this patch! All I can say is, thank you! haha! I always keep it on 160 to avoid this very thing... (unless i can't.)

#3 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 12 September 2012 - 08:14 PM

I have this patch! All I can say is, thank you! haha! I always keep it on 160 to avoid this very thing... (unless i can't.)


I am glad that this could be of help. ISO 640 is just slightly more noisy than ISO 160 (but only if you select ISO 800 first, then go to ISO 640). It's very usable. There is also a theory out there that higher ISO will cut down on color banding so a little noise on this camera may not be such a bad thing!
  • nahua likes this

#4 Mirrorkisser

Mirrorkisser

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 187 posts

Posted 13 September 2012 - 02:53 PM

I read it too at personal-view and tested it: its true. Really weird. It also happened with other settings, not only flowmotion. I wonder what the issue is. Its not much of a deal if you know the workaround, still its another routine to go through...

#5 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 13 September 2012 - 02:56 PM

I read it too at personal-view and tested it: its true. Really weird. It also happened with other settings, not only flowmotion. I wonder what the issue is. Its not much of a deal if you know the workaround, still its another routine to go through...


It's just another thing to forget. I hope that the GH3 resolves this.

#6 Germy1979

Germy1979

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 572 posts

Posted 13 September 2012 - 04:37 PM

It's just another thing to forget. I hope that the GH3 resolves this.


Amen.

#7 nahua

nahua

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 407 posts
  • LocationHawaii

Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:58 AM

Thank you for letting us know. I thought it was only ISO320, but you're right about the other ranges. I'm looking forward to the GH3. Monday can't come quick enough!!

#8 kirk

kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:28 AM

I'm soon a relic of the past, who still love my two GH2s, warts, bugs and all ;)

I'm sure I'll be tempted by the GH3 but probably can't afford it until the GH4 arrives... And should money unexpectedly come my way, I'd probably wait for the successor to the AF100 (since I almost never shoot stills with the GH2 anyway)...

#9 KarimNassar

KarimNassar

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 237 posts
  • LocationSwitzerland

Posted 14 September 2012 - 09:30 AM

ha! very interesting thanks for sharing! I'll shoot at 320iso from now on...

vimeo / vimeo channel

facebook / my photographer, cinematographer page

 


#10 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:20 PM

I haven't seen a side by side test like this so I decided to create one. The video is uploading on Vimeo but I suspect that the compression will make it difficult to gauge, so here are some screen grabs. Please click to view full screen:

Posted Image


*I should also add that each stripe was sampled from the center of the image.


Posted Image


Posted Image


My previous tests concluded that ISO 320 was the sweet spot. However, when I did the same test this time, ISO 320 gave me a lot of macro blocking. Bizarre! I don't believe that I changed anything between last time's test and this one. To me, these images suggest that you'd be best off parking it in ISO 640 and leaving it there.

It's also interesting that different ISOs seem to have different color casts.
  • Mirrorkisser and andy lee like this

#11 kirk

kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:41 PM

But remember to park it one step over and step down before shooting... :rolleyes:

#12 pietz

pietz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 93 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:47 PM

please QuickHitRecord check that myth of having to step down to get lower noise.

#13 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:50 PM

please QuickHitRecord check that myth of having to step down to get lower noise.


I already have:

I did a full-range ISO test of my GH2 with the Flowmotion 2.02 settings, starting at 12800 and working my way down to 160. I did this after reading a little more about the GH2 ISO bug. Initially, I had read that if you wanted to use ISOs 320, 640 or 1250, you had to switch the camera on and first go to any higher ISO, and then back to one of these three to minimize noise. Then I did some more reading on Personal-View and apparently what you want to do is go to the next ISO increment up, and then back down to the desired setting (so if you want ISO 320, go to ISO 400, then back to 320; if you want 640, go to 800, then back to 640). This seemed to result in a MUCH cleaner image than my initial tests with the first image. The footage is pretty usable up to ISO 1250, at least with the Flowmotion hack.


It's in the resulting images above as well. I started at the highest ISO and worked my way down to the lowest, accommodating the ISO bug.

#14 Jon de Zwaan

Jon de Zwaan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • LocationThe Lowlands

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:52 PM

Thanks for sharing QuickHitRecord!

www.jondezwaan.nl


#15 andy lee

andy lee

    ANDY LEE

  • Moderators
  • 1,533 posts
  • LocationUNITED KINGDOM

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:57 PM

I haven't seen a side by side test like this so I decided to create one. The video is uploading on Vimeo but I suspect that the compression will make it difficult to gauge, so here are some screen grabs. Please click to view full screen:

Posted Image


*I should also add that each stripe was sampled from the center of the image.


Posted Image


Posted Image


My previous tests concluded that ISO 320 was the sweet spot. However, when I did the same test this time, ISO 320 gave me a lot of macro blocking. Bizarre! I don't believe that I changed anything between last time's test and this one. To me, these images suggest that you'd be best off parking it in ISO 640 and leaving it there.

It's also interesting that different ISOs seem to have different color casts.



very interesting to see this ! thanks for doing this...
what picture profile are you set on?

Andy Lee
LTI Films
Tecnoir

'If it looks good , it is good!'


#16 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:02 PM

very interesting to see this ! thanks for doing this...
what picture profile are you set on?


I should have mentioned. I am in 'Smooth'.

#17 andy lee

andy lee

    ANDY LEE

  • Moderators
  • 1,533 posts
  • LocationUNITED KINGDOM

Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:12 PM

Im using Quantum 9b update hack
I wonder how similar it is to this?

Andy Lee
LTI Films
Tecnoir

'If it looks good , it is good!'


#18 QuickHitRecord

QuickHitRecord

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 809 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 03:29 PM

It wouldn't be hard to find out! Just leave your lens cap on and record a bunch of 5-second clips starting at the ISO 12800, then enhance the noise in post.
  • andy lee likes this

#19 andy lee

andy lee

    ANDY LEE

  • Moderators
  • 1,533 posts
  • LocationUNITED KINGDOM

Posted 08 November 2012 - 05:43 PM

will give it a go thanks

Andy Lee
LTI Films
Tecnoir

'If it looks good , it is good!'


#20 Sean Cunningham

Sean Cunningham

    Pixel Cowboy

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 979 posts
  • LocationAustin, Texas

Posted 21 February 2013 - 09:52 AM

I decided to check this out for the Driftwood "Moon 3" patch...ISO 640 is clearly very good with this one.

 

2wc1dp5.png

 

...color...

 

 

ju7fh1.png

 

...RED channel...

 

 

14c78yv.png

 

...GREEN channel...

 

2uzdk5d.png

 

...BLUE channel...

 

 

2554zlw.png

 

...LUMA only...







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: gh2, iso, test, tests, flowmotion

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users