Do your lenses adapt to the Sony A77 a-mount?


Sony Alpha Leica R Adapter by JIN Finance

All lenses are designed to be placed at a certain distance from the sensor. Too far away and you won’t get infinity focus. In fact – if it’s off by just a few millimetres your lovely lens will become a macro optic only useful for taking snaps of insects and flowers.

So what DSLRs will your current lenses adapt to? The rule to follow is to see what your body’s flange size is. That isn’t innuendo it refers to something technical! Let me explain…

The flange size is the distance between the mount and the sensor. Essentially if your DSLR body’s flange is longer than that for which the lens is designed for the lens can’t be used. If it is shorter and you can fit an adapter in the gap then the lens will be at the right flange distance to focus so all’s good to go.

Actually what really matters is the distance between the rear lens element and the sensor, but the mount and the mirror have the biggest influence. The mirror can get in the way of the rear element and the mount’s flange distance can stop the rear element from being close enough to the sensor for infinity focus.

For example – Canon made sure to make the EF mount incompatible with the previous FD mount. EF is larger at 44mm whilst the old mount was 42mm. So lovely FD lenses cannot be used on Canon bodies without being rebuilt, or without degrading corrective optics in the adapter.

With the upcoming Sony A77 looking very promising for video, I am wondering which of my lenses will work and which won’t so have done some research. The A mount is based on the old Minolta SLR mount and is 44.5mm – even longer than the EF mount!

Canon and Leica-R

That’s not good news for Canon lens hoarders. That tiny extra 0.5mm of the Alpha flange and another 1-2mm used by the adapter ring would take up means the mount is roughly 1.5-2.5mm too far away from the sensor: enough to completely knock out focus.

This is where Leica-R glass has an advantage. It has a flange of 47mm. Just that bit longer to fit an adapter in between the A-mount of the body and the back of the lens whilst getting the lens exactly 47mm away from the sensor and not a millimetre more.


M42 lenses are 45.46mm but because they’re not a bayonet fixing they can screw into the adapter meaning the rear of the lens can just about get down to 44.5mm on a Sony Alpha, as they can on Canon’s EF mount at 44mm. The Sony adapter ring is 0.5mm thinner than the already thin Canon versions so manufacturing tolerances need to be spot on. Various M42-Sony adapters claim infinity focus and although a well made M42 to A-mount adapter should be capable some cheaper versions are slightly too thick and you’d have to stop down for a deeper depth of field to get a sharp image at infinity.

Nikon and Contax Zeiss

Nikon lenses have a 46.50mm flange – just 0.5mm shorter than Leica but that is enough to knock off infinity focus on a Sony DSLR, ditto for Contax Yashica (CY) Zeiss lenses, they are just 1mm over the Sony mount at 45.50mm. Adapters do exist on eBay but they have cheap and nasty corrective optics and won’t produce a sharp image unless you stop down significantly.

UPDATE: Dan Chung tells me there is a hardware mode that lets you use Nikon and Contax lenses on a Sony Alpha. Check this out here and here.


The Arri PL mount has a mount flange of 52mm but the back of the lens protrudes quite far into it, meaning it hits the mirror on Canon and Sony DSLRs. You have to have the camera modified expertly but it is possible to use this glass, even on full frame DSLRs like the 5D Mark II.

Check out Hot Rod Cameras for this

What about the NEX 7?

Sony NEX and Alpha DSLRs with Leica R lenses

Above photo by Byron Jyu

Mirrorless cameras – yes you guessed it – don’t have a mirror, so the distance between the rear of the lens and the front of the sensor can be much smaller. With nothing in the way an adapter just needs to bulk up the rest of the distance between the camera and the lens.

The lens always needs to be X milimeters away from the sensor, because that is how the lens is designed for its mount. Too close or too far away won’t do. A Canon EF lens will always need to be exactly 44mm away from the sensor to focus correctly.

The flange-back of Sony NEX 7’s E-Mount and E-mount lenses is 18mm and for Micro Four Thirds it’s 20mm. The world’s smallest flange (!) currently belongs to the Pentax Q which is 9.2mm, in part thanks to it’s small sensor.

If the flange is too short but the sensor large you tend to get soft corners and light fall-off like on the Sony NEX 16mm F2.8 pancake. An APS-C sized sensor and a 18mm flange is pushing the limits!

Essentially anything that covers an APS-C sensor will adapt to the Sony NEX 7. Most c-mount lenses and Micro Four Third lenses wider than 50mm will vignette, however (like the Voigtlander Nokton 25mm F0.95).

The largest flange distance for any lens is 61mm for the Russian OCT19 cinema lenses and anamorphic glass. OCT19 was Russia’s answer to PL. These will basically adapt to anything. (Not so with OCT18 though which currently only go to mirrorless E and MFT mount).


These types of non-Sony lenses works with an Alpha DSLR or SLT like the A77:

  • Leica-R
  • M42
  • Minolta
  • OCT 19

Get the adapters

Buy the Leica-R to Sony Alpha lens adapter
Buy an M42 adapter for Sony Alpha DSLRs here – as cheap as $10!

Third party A-mount lenses

Samyang will release their 24mm F1.4 in Sony A-mount and it will be very interesting to compare it to the Zeiss 24mm F1.8 that launches alongside the A77. If South Korea start beating the Germans and Japanese at optics that is a serious wake up call!

The Samyang 14mm F2.8, 35mm F1.4 and 85mm F1.4 are also well worth buying – they’re full frame compatible too so when Sony update their full frame line of Alphas with video these lenses will truly come into their own. On APS-C 14mm is lovely and wide too and that will be my wide-angle prime of choice for the A77. If you want to go wider and have a zoom, the Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 is another great option but double the price.

Further reading

Here is a handy chart with almost all interchangeable lens mount flange distances on Wikipedia

About Author

British filmmaker and editor of EOSHD, Andrew works in Berlin on his own self funded filmmaking and video projects.


  1. Great post! I was doing some research too over the last days and this sums it up nice! If you want to use the Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 on the A-Mount you will need two adapters, right? From Canon or Nikon to M42 first…

  2. gene_can_sing on

    I have a question for those of you in the know.

    Suppose Canon does come out with a Mirrorless EVF DSLR in the future. Would we have to use an adapter to use our existing Canon lenses on the future Mirrorless Canon DSLR since the flange length could be much shorter?

    Or, could they just use the existing interface for EOS lenses and we’d be able to use existing Canon EOS lenses without an adapter on a future Canon Mirrorless?

    Hope that wasn’t too confusing of a question. That would be strange to have to use an adapter on Canons for their own lenses.

  3. You’d need some kind of adapter because the flange size would be different, unless they are really daft and produce a mirrorless with an EF mount! Not really worth thinking about at the moment because nobody really knows what Canon are up to with their mirrorless.

  4. What an excellent article Mr. Reid! Long time reader, first time poster.

    Anyway, if I’m making the jump from the Almighty GH2, which I use almost exclusively with Canon nFD lens, what line of vintage lenses do you suggest I take up for, let’s say. the VG20, or the A77, both which NEED for my upcoming feature.

    Any other line of lenses that’s just as consistent with quality glass, variety of focal lengths and speeds, and won’t rape my paypal balance account?

  5. Damn, that has really ruined my day. I’ve been building up a great set of Nikon AIS primes over the past 2 years and been using a couple of hacked GH1’s up until now. I was hoping this new Sony camera would be the first camera to beat the image quality of the GH2 plus with 1080 60p. It may still do this, but it’s out of the question now if the lenses won’t mount.

  6. Been looking at that Leitax mount replacement and has rekindled the hope slightly. It seems straight forward enough to take 3 screws out and change out the bayonet but at over £50 for a bit of metal I don’t think I’ll be buying 10 of them to convert all my lenses. Roll on the knock offs from Hong Kong, if this A77 is as good as we all hope it is then there should certainly be demand for Nikon to Alpha mounts.

  7. exactly, get the nex7, vg20, or nex5n. mirrorless is clearly the way to get, think about it, a mirror box serves no purpose in a video camera and its becoming outdated in all regards thanks to the pace of technology. also, people have been adapting all kinds of glass to the current nex cameras for a while just like m4/3, go with one of the nex’s and never look back… unless of coarse these cameras are a huge disappointment which is still a HUGE POSSIBILITY. its nice to dream, but we probably will be disappointed, i dont see sony giving us cheap cameras that compete or equal their pro lines video performance and quality.

  8. How can the NEX7 have the same image quality as the A77 at half the price? It’s my understanding that the NEX is m4/3s while the A77 will be APSC, so that’s a different sensor is it not? Also 1080 60p on a NEX7? I’m really looking for a full frame GH2 (aren’t we all?), so would rather move to a larger sensor size. There’s always a slim chance that the Nikon D800 might be a performer. Can only hope.

  9. actually the nex7 will be more expensive then the a77, they have the same aps-c sensor, nex is not micro4/3, yes it will have 1080 60p if rumors are correct, and were never getting a full frame gh2.

  10. The NEX cameras are all APS-C…it seems to be a common misconception that the NEX cameras are m4/3rds.

    Although I might expect that the NEX7 might have better image quality than the A77, since the A77 has the translucent mirror that results in a little light loss. I’m a little lazy to check, but a quick DxOMark comparison between the NEX C3 and the SLT-A55 shows that the NEXC3 has superior high-iso performance. Supposely both cameras are using the same 16mp sensor.

  11. The only doubt I have about getting the NEX 7 over the A77 is that currently P/S/A/M in video mode isn’t confirmed on the NEX, whilst it is 100% confirmed for the A77. Will have to wait and see what happens here… Ditto NEX 5N, which on paper is looking great… Similar image processor to the NEX 7 but same sensor as the C3. Does 24p and 1080/60p like the NEX 7 but will be much cheaper.

  12. crashandannie on

    Hi, Andrew,

    Nice article as usual. I don’t always agree with you, but I respect your opinions!

    Just a quick update for this one: the FFL for the BNCR mount is 61.468mm, making it slightly longer than the OCT19. Amazingly good Cine lenses can be found with this mount such as Canon K35s and Cooke SPs, but the price has skyrocketed since I bought my sets several years ago. On the good side, they are readily available for rental on both sides of the Atlantic.

Leave A Reply