Jump to content
Tito Ferradans

Anamorphic on a Budget.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Mike Needs said:

Thank you for the reply!.. I am very new to the anamorphic world, and I am just realising the size on this monster!.. do you think it would be single focus or double?.. 

many thanks again

Mikey

That I know. Double focus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

SLR Magic rangefinder lived on my camera for couple days, and went back home:)

it softens picture, not a lot, but still, and it makes setup bulky, for the same reason i am not after Core DNA, not giving up my small form factor for anything, well relatively small,

so most likely Isco 36 or 42, but i still can't decide between single focus and 2x squeeze, 2x is so freakin good, i just love it!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn! I just remembered this thread, and I've posted a decent number of videos since the last update! hahaha

ANAMORPHIC COOKBOOK - A CRY FOR HELP
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=8752

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SINGLE FOCUS SHOOTOUT
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=9496

ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - ANAMORPHIC MUMPS CORRECTOR
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13852

ANAMORPHIC COOKBOOK - UPCOMING, 2017
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13941

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - CINEMORPH SIGMA 18-35MM F/1.8 ART
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13960

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - CINEMORPH FILTERS
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13998

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SLR MAGIC ANAMORPHOT 1.33X-40
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13954

ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - SLR MAGIC FLARE FIX
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14073

ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - ANAMORPHIC AND DAVINCI RESOLVE
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14107

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - KOWA 8-Z
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13963

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SANKOR 16-D
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13962

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - ISCO ULTRA STAR
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14072

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - SINGLE FOCUS SHOOTOUT "HELD"
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14158

ANAMORPHIC COOKBOOK - WE'RE BACK ON A BUDGET!
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14179

ANAMORPHIC ON A BUDGET - LETUS ANAMORPHX-GP 1.33X
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13953

ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - INSTALLING THE LETUS ANAMORPHX-GP
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=13958

 

And, on the side, I had a few narrative projects that I posted about, in case anyone is interested in the stuff I do besides the reviews!

OVERNIGHT - PRODUCTION OVERVIEW
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14090

OVERNIGHT - PRODUCTION UPDATE
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=14106

UP & AWAY - INDIEGOGO CAMPAIGN

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 25/02/2017 at 3:15 AM, bzpop said:

but i still can't decide between single focus and 2x squeeze, 2x is so freakin good, i just love it!

 

I can't really see the point in 1.5x, if you're going to all that hassle and expense you might as well go the whole way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/21/2017 at 11:17 PM, tweak said:

I can't really see the point in 1.5x, if you're going to all that hassle and expense you might as well go the whole way.

Because 1.5x will take HD or UHD (present on all cameras) and convert it to scope.

That's why :)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, eris said:

Because 1.5x will take HD or UHD (present on all cameras) and convert it to scope.

That's why :)

 

 

true that, but to me anamorphic is not about convenience, it is about the look:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, bzpop said:

true that, but to me anamorphic is not about convenience, it is about the look:)

True enough.  1.5x looks pretty good.  significantly better than 1.3x which I agree -- why bother.

I'm tending towards 2x now that the GH5 has great support and CoreDNA is available.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, bzpop said:

true that, but to me anamorphic is not about convenience, it is about the look:)

Exactly. And as pointed out, most cameras like GH5 de-squeeze a 2x image, which is in the price range for someone buying an Iscorama (If you're using more expensive camera i.e Alexa etc, you'd just rent 2x lenses).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

don't really care much about desqueeze, and not i don't even use it on GH5, as long as i can see the whole frame it doesn't matter to me ,

but 4:3 mode is an awesome feature, can't wait til Adobe will bring the 6K footage fix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/3/2017 at 1:57 PM, bzpop said:

don't really care much about desqueeze, and not i don't even use it on GH5, as long as i can see the whole frame it doesn't matter to me ,

but 4:3 mode is an awesome feature, can't wait til Adobe will bring the 6K footage fix

Agreed.  Don't use on-camera de-squeeze since my monitor can do 1.3, 1.5, 1.75 and 2x.  I guess it would be important if you're going lightweight.  My DP, Mauri Galiano tried the GH5 in open-gate 6k anamorphic with a variety of 2x lenses.  He said it's fantastic and the only problem right now is there's a bug in H265 decoding in Premiere.  

I use Davinci so it's not so much of an issue.

Now I just need to get a good mount for my Sankor 16D.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...