plucas

Update to what I earlier said.
There's a new build from March 7th and it allows you to record 1832x1024, 24/25fps, 14 bit lossless, 16:9 with "Realtime" preview.
Sounds good but here's some limitations to keep in mind:
ISO only good to 400; any higher makes it vulnerable to "hot pixels" DPAF works effectively only in "zone" mode; not with "Face tracking" No 46fps/48fps slow motion in 1080p mode (as with the EOS M, for example); 60fps only in 720p. See this thread: https://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=14309.3300 

To each their own, I recently bought a C200 not expecting to use RAW that much but with the very simple workflow, USB-C speed & storage space coming way down, I'm finding myself shooting RAW as much as possible. It's kind of hard to go back to 8-bit after 10-bit but even harder once you start messing with 12-bit RAW. 
Having access to RAW internally at a flick of a switch is a godsend imo and brings me back to MLRaw days (minus the post workflow & reliability issues!).
I have 2 Atomos recorders (including the V) and use them as monitors 95% of the time. Internal recording is the way to go for me.
HEIC is also very interesting for stills giving basically 10-bit 4:2:2 vs 8-bit 4:2:0 for JPGs. 

There's some reviews in on YouTube:
 

They found some room in the budget!

They found some room in the budget!

They found some room in the budget!

They found some room in the budget!

That's a Sony exclusive so I think Canon will avoid it unless they want a lawsuit.

C100ii by a large margin.

Hmm that might be hard to say. I have to pick the C100.

Haha, all good. Its good to see the EOS M getting a good work out
 Best cam for me in my opinion. A lot of people are seeing its true potential and what beautiful footage it can create for the price.

The EOSMPCC:
 

The EOSMPCC:
 

The EOSMPCC:
 

From Zeek: slow-motion test on the EOS M.
 

From Zeek: slow-motion test on the EOS M.
 

No problem. I they're both great cameras for sure! I just prefer the form factor of the EOS M and how the files look when they're graded compared to the 5DII. Cheers

I have two EOS M's and have had two 5D2's, the 5D is cleaner than the EOS M without the speedbooster at high ISOs. Pop a speedbooster on the EOS M and then they're pretty close with the 5D slightly at the upper hand. Honestly, I don't get the point of shooting at high ISO's (unless it's your base ISO e.g. 800). If you must shoot in the dark, just use some cheap lights, an iphone screen or something and then add de-noising and it's fine. 

Some great stuff here, the EOS-m looks like a true little bargain thanks to Magic Lantern, shame they haven't got it working on the M50 before I sold it, may have kept me in the Canon family

How we feel about Canon sometimes:
 

No, no slow motion was used in the video "quick night test", it's just really slow movement from myself and a bit of stabilisation. The Tamron 85mm f1.8 VC is a renown lens, should be good, although it will make footage look a little compressed if that's what you're after. The VC is really good on it, I used to have the 45mm F1.8 a while back with my 5DIII. 

Thanks for the tip! Perhaps that 45fps option in 1080p for 2 seconds max could still be useful if slowed down to 50%. Four second B roll clips are very short but if you take enough of them, you could still end up with enough material for decent B roll. I don't know if that's what you used but you look to utilise some slow motion from the EOS M in your "Quick Night Test" video - near the start with the traffic lights, the phone box clip, and on the shoes.
I'm about to next try out the Tamron 85 1.8 SP VC, which arrived today.

720p is a no-go with RAW on any ML Capable camera as it will produce aliasing like crazy! Aliasing is common nature for digital cameras, some more than others. There is aliasing even with Blackmagic RAW Cameras. I wouldn't touch 720p at all. I also have the nifty fifty STM and that lens is really great, but aliasing can be quite pronounce depending on how you use it (e.g. infinity focus or wide open). 

Some 14bit lossless frames from my 70D. No sensor crop, full width Super 35mm. Continuous with SD UHS hack (approx. 50MB per sec)



It's very filmic.
No anti-aliasing filter used, just classic EF 28-70mm F2.8 with ND.
Digital Bolex with AF finally here!
What are the advantages of the 7D?
One more...
Seems VAF isn't even really needed!

(all frame grabs exported from DNGs as upscaled 4K JPEGs)

Yes the whole point of ML for me, is that the images are artistic, low-fi, messed-up, film like, amazing to grade... The opposite of modern 8K digital.
No matter how good our expensive full frame mirrorless cameras get, there will always be a place for a ML raw video or Digital Bolex Super 16