Mmmbeats

Which is the Ripple tutorial referred to? Googling suggests a few different options.

Any way of speculating whether the Panasonic lenses for this system will be focus-by-wire only?

Just for a bit of variety - I happen to think that Cinelike V is really nice for a quick-turnaround profile. The image looks really nice out of the camera, although it might be a bit contrasty for some tastes. I use - Cinelike V: -4, -5, -3, -1, 0

Not such a big problem. You either buy one really good camera, or the other really good camera. Happy days.

Dunno about obsolete. Most established professionals would pay a big premium for a fully-equipped cinema camera over a luxury hybrid, even if the jump in image-quality was tiny or non-existent. Not the same for entryists and monied enthusiasts of course. While the EVA1 might be a bit dented (or even seriously so), Varicam would be untroubled I'd imagine. For a piece of the expensive but mass-market FF mirror-less sector, that maths might possibly add up for Panasonic.

Are there likely to be advantages for video of the S1 over the S1R, or the other way round, would people think?

I hope it does end up on the S1. I always figured the the V-LOG-L charge was a way of keeping it out of the hands of inexperienced graders as much as anything?

Well I have had good useable results with a monopod, but it's closer to a hand-held look than a rock-steady locked-off tripod look. Sometimes that energy works well with fast-moving event or doc footage. I've never had any complaints. Before I got the tripod I did, for a brief period of time, use to use a single leg of a tripod as a makeshift monopod, but that's not very good for the health of the locking mechanisms. It's true that you can't really pan or tile very easily with them though. You can do some interesting faux slider movements though, that sometimes work well.

They're just another tool set, aren't they? I've used monopods a lot for event work and other fast moving stuff. They are absolutely great, although I find some of the claims about them on this thread a bit of an exaggeration. Specifically there's almost always a bit of sway going on with them that distinguishes them from tripod shots. Also, the noise of the latches used to adjust height on my manfrotto monopod is sometimes problematic - not so much for ruining a shot, as for distracting the subjects and drawing attention to myself. On a very small number of occasions (coincidentally, I plan on doing so later today!) - I pull out my little GX80 and go IBIS handheld. It's a really good go-to, which means that I can pack light, be unobtrusive, move around swiftly, and get static shots that are equal in steadiness to a monopod. I say static shots - for tracking shots I find the movement quite unpredictable with IBIS, so I don't really use it in that way. So, yeah - a great new tool, that is going to compliment rather than replace the old methods. I feel similarly about AF. I'm all manual focus and have never had a camera with reliable AF for video. But there are certainly occasions when it would be useful. It would be ridiculous to say that either tool was suddenly 'necessary' though.

I was about to say that the Bucky Ball is the largest object to have been passed through the two-slit experiment (and exhibit wave-particle duality), but I notice that my information is way out of date, and they've been flipping significantly larger objects through that thing for quite some time now ?.

I did see that, but thanks for the nudge. I'm still a little confused as to whether the classics are still in production, or whether it's a case of snap up what's left.

Thanks. Yes, once again I find myself wishing B&H had a UK branch. I get stuff sent over from them, but I reckon I'd get smashed for duty on those lenses. Manual focus is okay by me. Honestly, clickable aperture hasn't been a thing for me yet (rare for me to have to radically alter exposure mid-shot, and when I do it's usually via vari-ND). Focus throw however is important, but it doesn't seem too too bad on these - they seem to range from around 125° to a pretty healthy 225°. Plus they seem to be reviewed as not overly sharp, in fact some complaints from stills shooters in that regard. I'm still tempted.

I don't know how quite to refer to the lenses I'm thinking of. They are stills lenses (also listed under videography!). On Zeiss's website they are listed as 'classic'. Elsewhere I read that some of them have been discontinued. https://www.zeiss.co.uk/camera-lenses/photography/products/classic-lenses/distagon-225.html Seem like a value way to get into quality glass. Maybe I will one day, but I currently don't really need 'cine' features. They are cheaper (and a lot nicer looking!) than the Milvus range that seems to be their replacement. They are also, of course, a lot more affordable than the Zeiss cine ranges. But are they decent? Are they still being made / supported? And how to find them? (searches are corrupted with both vintage Zeiss and the newer ranges).

I really like the look of the Voigtländer Nokton f/0.95 lenses for MFT. I guess it's a kinda modern-but-veering-towards-vintage look. I'm considering getting a set, but now I'm backing off a little because I'll almost certainly be looking for a 35mm cinema camera (or perhaps a mirrorless FF) in the future and want to keep my options open a bit. Are there any modern prime lenses (I don't want to get vintage as my main set) that similarly have 'character'? I've started looking at Zeiss primes - though I'm finding the lineup a bit confusing. The ones I'm drawn to are the 'classic' range, which seems to have been recently retired, but is still available here and there. Any thoughts? Alternatives?

Why's that? Is it possible to adapt the lens at all? Say to MFT?

I'm guessing then there are no implications for video? (of pixel-shift)

So how does pixel-shift work?

I can really appreciate that post, and identify with the grievances you raise. I know how a drip drip of small slights can add up to a major frustration. I also think you are right to strike out at the fraudulent and self-serving nature of the camera release world. More power to you. I'm glad also that this post is a bit self-reflective. Like others I posted that your article was a bit of an own-goal - I was actually genuinely a bit worried for your state of well-being. I hope you achieve great success in challenging some of these goings on in the industry - and I hope you learn some lessons from this that make you better equipped to do so!!!

It hasn't happened yet ?.

Not quite sure what you mean. But leaking personal data actually *is* illegal (in the EU at least).

EVA1 does have RAW out.

This honestly doesn't reflect well on anybody, least of all yourself. Freezing the thread for a cool-off was a good idea. My advice (unsolicited I know!) would be to take that down for a similar period and then consider if you really want it out there. It comes off as sour grapes, and just isn't a smart response.

Some low-level rumours out and about (not usually that reliable, but worth discussing I guess). Certainly enticing if anywhere near accurate: https://www.43rumors.com/ft2-confirmed-and-unconfirmed-details-of-panasonic-ff-camera/

Fiendish! (and a little overthinky I reckon).

It's also a physically bigger sensor. Why would Panasonic be concerned about potential GH5 buyers getting the even more expensive GH5S from them instead???