Jump to content

Attila Bakos

Members
  • Content Count

    418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from DBounce in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    Nice DR straight out of cam:
     
  2. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from lucabutera in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    Nice DR straight out of cam:
     
  3. Thanks
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from androidlad in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    Out of curiosity I created two videos from a UHD sized TIF with lots of fine detail, once with SAO and SIS enabled, then disabled. I used the x265 library included in ffmpeg using CRF 3 for a raised bitrate and no other parameters besides SAO/SIS. I see absolutely no difference between the two versions even at 400% magnification. Then I thought maybe it's because there's no movement as it's a still image. So I downloaded some DNG's from Blackmagic's website, exported a short clip in Resolve using lossless AVI, and used the same ffmpeg scripts. Again, zero difference between the smoothed and non-smoothed versions. I checked the files with mediainfo to see the if the encoding parameters were passed to the x265 library and they are there.

    To make it short: if the hardware encoder works in a similar way (and I didn't fuck up my test somehow), I wouldn't worry about detail loss.
  4. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from CyclingBen in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    I'll look into this as well when my X-T3 arrives. Ordered it today.
  5. Haha
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from jonpais in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    Nope it was an auto ISO problem, Zed even mentions it in this video from 6:40:
     
    Edit: funny thing is that you as the creator of this thread specifically mention smooth auto iso as a feature of v1.10:
  6. Thanks
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Emanuel in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    Does anyone know a smart way to mount this to the X-T3? Anker PowerCore+ 26800 PD
    According to Fuji, it should give you 400 mins of 4K60 recording time, compared to 40 mins with the battery.
  7. Thanks
    Attila Bakos reacted to Jimmy in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    The 18-55 is what it is, a small, cheap, above average kit lens, the AF is good and smooth. I've yet to try the 16-55, so can't give a direct comparison, but the 18-55 doesn't have the soul of the prime lens, which is to be expected. 
  8. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from jonpais in FUJINON lenses questions, tips and tricks   
    It's on vimeo as well, the description says 18-55: https://vimeo.com/195452189
  9. Thanks
    Attila Bakos reacted to Ingerson in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    Rolling shutter tests here:
    4k 24p: https://vimeo.com/292103456/f01f36ff9b
    4k 60p: https://vimeo.com/292103784/bae8f67cef
    1080p24: https://vimeo.com/292104075/3cca0aa757
    1080p60: https://vimeo.com/292104319/73eacbf42b
    1080p120 (24fps playback): https://vimeo.com/292104581/7488279a51
  10. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from lucabutera in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    The Fringer adapter is looking good on the X-T3:
     
  11. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from tomsemiterrific in I WILL be getting a Fuji X-T3!   
    AF test with older primes compared to X-T2. X-T3 focuses faster with less hunting, also continuous AF seems to be more confident, however the transition between close and far subjects is not butter smooth. Might be better with newer lenses.
     
  12. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Snowbro in How Do I Make This Color Grade?   
    Well I just created another tool, which does exactly that, it can combine/merge 3DLUTs: http://colorizer.net/index.php?op=lut_combiner
    It's in beta testing state, please tell me if you find any errors.
  13. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from frontfocus in Fuji X-T3 has 4K60P and 10 bit   
    It's not a good idea to judge banding by youtube footage.
    If I apply more contrast to the youtube frame to show banding, this is what I get:

    Now if I go to vimeo and download the original ungraded version, and apply about the same contrast, this is what I get:

     
    And the original ungraded version uploaded to vimeo is still 8bit! In 10bit you will have even less banding.
  14. Thanks
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from sanveer in Fuji X-T3 has 4K60P and 10 bit   
    It's not a good idea to judge banding by youtube footage.
    If I apply more contrast to the youtube frame to show banding, this is what I get:

    Now if I go to vimeo and download the original ungraded version, and apply about the same contrast, this is what I get:

     
    And the original ungraded version uploaded to vimeo is still 8bit! In 10bit you will have even less banding.
  15. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Simon Young in Fuji X-T3 has 4K60P and 10 bit   
    It's not a good idea to judge banding by youtube footage.
    If I apply more contrast to the youtube frame to show banding, this is what I get:

    Now if I go to vimeo and download the original ungraded version, and apply about the same contrast, this is what I get:

     
    And the original ungraded version uploaded to vimeo is still 8bit! In 10bit you will have even less banding.
  16. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from meudig in Fuji X-T3 has 4K60P and 10 bit   
    It's not a good idea to judge banding by youtube footage.
    If I apply more contrast to the youtube frame to show banding, this is what I get:

    Now if I go to vimeo and download the original ungraded version, and apply about the same contrast, this is what I get:

     
    And the original ungraded version uploaded to vimeo is still 8bit! In 10bit you will have even less banding.
  17. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from mercer in Fuji X-T3 has 4K60P and 10 bit   
    While it's true that H.265 can have the same quality as H.264 with approx. 50% of the bitrate, it's only at low bitrates, like streaming. As far as I remember at such high bitrates like 400Mbps the difference would be almost non existent, but I can't show you any test at the moment that proves this, maybe someone else can.
  18. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from frontfocus in Fuji X-T3 has 4K60P and 10 bit   
    To me it seems like 4K60 10bit 4:2:0 internal, and 4:2:2 external.
  19. Like
    Attila Bakos reacted to kinoseed in PhotoMatch: Automatic Image Color Grading   
    There has been a lot of updates of the app, so give it a try, and let me know what you think.
    To save the generated LUT, press the "cloud download" icon.
    Android app can be downloaded here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kinoseed.matchcolor
    Here's how things look like now:

  20. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Walter H in Film simulation 3D LUTs for Fujifilm X-T2 F-Log   
    Thanks a lot! I don't have a Fuji body at the moment, but I have some savings for the X-T3. If it turns out to be good then I'll make new LUTs. Until then visit my experimental project: http://colorizer.net/index.php?op=lut_contrast
    With this tool you can remove the contrast curve of a 3D LUT. With the method I use the curve of the Eterna LUT can't be removed without distortion of the RGB transformation, but you won't necessarily see it in real-life footage. Maybe try 50% strength or less.
  21. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Vladimir in Film simulation 3D LUTs for Fujifilm X-T2 F-Log   
    I recently finished this project. If you like the results, download the LUTs for free on colorizer.net.
     
  22. Like
    Attila Bakos reacted to Vladimir in Fuji X-H1. IBIS, Phase Detect 4K beast?   
    and here is a complete work (some art event deep inside russian territory):
     
  23. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Vladimir in Sony a7 III discussion   
    Resolve makes it very easy to convert the color space from Rec.2020 to Rec.709, using the built-in color space transform plugin.
    In case you are using another NLE, I generated a LUT using 3D LUT Creator that does the same conversion: Rec.2020_to_Rec.709.cube
    I couldn't test it, but it should be fine.
  24. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from TheRenaissanceMan in Sony a7 III discussion   
    I believe it's user error, and a common one unfortunately, even among people who actually teach log grading. He shot many clips in S-Log2/S-Gamut, and forgot to convert color space during color correction.
    This a screenshot from his video:

    Here it is corrected with the color space transform plugin in Resolve, I only added a bit of contrast:

    Now if I skip color space transformation and only apply contrast and saturation, see what happens:

    And finally this is the uploaders grade:

     
    So it's pretty clear what's happening here, it's not the camera's fault.
  25. Like
    Attila Bakos got a reaction from Trek of Joy in Film simulation 3D LUTs for Fujifilm X-T2 F-Log   
    I recently finished this project. If you like the results, download the LUTs for free on colorizer.net.
     
×
×
  • Create New...