TwoScoops

I watched that documentary 'Cinematographer Style' last week. It's quite good.

Until BM adds the 2.7K s16 crop in firmware 1.3. I saw a Zeiss s16 set (well 4 of them) go for 2700ish a couple of weeks ago.

Somewhere between 0.95 and 1.4 - definitely no more stopped down than that. The EXIF says ISO 200 and 1/6400th so probably closer to 0.95. I had some video tests I shot with a model a couple of a years ago with the Voigt 17.5 vs the Pana 12-35 at 17ish, both at 2.8. The difference in 3D pop was quite remarkable but I can't find the files now.

The Voigt is much better than it looks in that comparison, it's an incredible lens. One of the few I really regret selling. I posted a still from my portfolio taken with the GH4/Voigt 17.5 here: https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/6396-lenses/?page=162&tab=comments#comment-233871 I felt like the Voigts coupled with the GH4 had the most mojo of any non medium format camera I've used for raw stills, and they made the video look a lot nicer too.

The Shining, Scarface and Terminator got mild reviews when released too. haha

Gotcha.

Have you found any comparison videos? The hire price of the C200 over here is just over half the C300II which is appealing.

How long did you spend trying to learn? Maybe you didn't find the right teaching materials.

^ Pretty sure 37 people have already said that.

Figured as much. Thanks.

How come 5D4 is on that calculator?

Regardless of discussion of whether it's the same sensor or not, how does the GH5s compare in that regard, in the 2500+ mode? Does it drop to 10 also?

100 pages. Maybe by 500 we'll have some new footage.

This is it. I remember when it came out there was talk about the unusual composition used, like all the headroom, etc.

Both shot with the BMOGCC. The first was re-made a few years later by the same director as a feature with a $5m budget. I prefer the 2nd tbh.