Jump to content

kgv5

Members
  • Content Count

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    kgv5 reacted to gt3rs in Canon C200 Philip Bloom Review   
    I fully agree that a lot will be published to YT and Vimeo but in this case you bring it down to the minimum quality that is YT compression and already reduced color information and with compression . It seems that people compare it to GH5 with completely different scenes, light, grading and it gives you some basic idea but IMO not a real representation of the camera possibility. On a well exposed lightly graded footage you will not see that much the difference between Raw and processed format... even a iPhone looks good in the best condition. The power of Raw is in more heavy grading possibility and in more DR and in more recovering headroom for hl and sh, how can you judge these from a highly compressed h264 4:2:0 image? 
  2. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from iamoui in Pro camcorders? They're pointless creatively.   
    And how about ursa mini 4.6k as a POV camera? I tried it with sigma 8-16 and made this short test
     
  3. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from andrgl in Pro camcorders? They're pointless creatively.   
    And how about ursa mini 4.6k as a POV camera? I tried it with sigma 8-16 and made this short test
     
  4. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Kubrickian in Pro camcorders? They're pointless creatively.   
    And how about ursa mini 4.6k as a POV camera? I tried it with sigma 8-16 and made this short test
     
  5. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Mattias Burling in Pro camcorders? They're pointless creatively.   
    And how about ursa mini 4.6k as a POV camera? I tried it with sigma 8-16 and made this short test
     
  6. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from TwoScoops in how to simulate the original "shake" of the old movies shot on film?   
    I have seen something like this - great little presets for premiere, i used them couple of times and looked cool.
    http://premierepro.net/editing/deadpool-handheld-camera-presets/
  7. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Riadnasla in Ursa mini 4.6K Porsche 911 R   
    Thanks, holographic car was made with 3d model of 911R in after effects. We use one led panel, my friend was just waving it above the car.
     
    Thanks, yeah, maybe I could make it a little bit shorter and more dynamic, the car owner wasnt very happy when i told him, that over 12 hour shoot became 1:20 seconds clip though  It was just a short, passion project without any serious planning. With this clip i just wanted to motivate other exotic car owners in my area so i could film their cars  
  8. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from myJTP in Canon C200 vs Panasonic GH5, a preview   
    I use ursa mini 4.6k for a couple of months now and 99 percent i shot raw 3:1 and 4:1. I use Cfast to sata breakout cable and record straight to couple of 500GB samsung 850evo SSDs without ANY problem. I dont understand crying about 15min on 128GB card - it is the same like on UM46K - 60min on 500GB. I have 4 SSDs, when i record in 2,4:1 aspect it gives 80min (25fps) /500GB so 320 minutes on four. SSDs are cheap. I also work straight from SSDs in resolve which is very convinient, no data copying. Adding 4 SSDs more and you have 10 hours worth of cards, should be plenty for a day shoot. For storing i can render very nice ProRes HQ BMDfilm version out of raw easily and fast. I only wonder if there will be possibility to open CFast door (to put Cfast breakout cable) in the C200 and still have camera working (5d swithces off when card doors are opened - which of course would be very bad).
    Everybody are waiting for GH5 400mbit codec - wait a minute, couple months ago people cried about 500mbit mjpeg codec from canon. It was sooooo ineficient, so hard to store etc. And now 400mbit is holy grail...
  9. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Juxx989 in Ursa mini 4.6K Porsche 911 R   
    Hi, i have just finished this clip, UM46K, all raw 4:1, mostly 50fps. Graded with resolve 14 beta 3, edited in adobe CC.
     
     
  10. Like
    kgv5 reacted to anakin316 in Casey Neistat - Panasonic GH5 shooter   
    Which lens is he using with the GH5?
  11. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Juxx989 in Car in the shower   
    Hi, yesterday i shot something like this, i wanted to see is 120fps enough for filming water sprays, well, it is enough just so... But i am happy with the result. 
     
     
  12. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Juxx989 in Car demo - Ursa Mini 4.6K   
    Hi, this is my short demo shot with Ursa mini 4.6K with canon 16-35 f2.8 L II lens. Graded in resolve 12.5, edited in premiere cc.
     
  13. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from webrunner5 in How will Canon, Sony, etc. respond to Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro?   
    BM cameras doesnt have any internal noise reduction. You get it with free davinci resolve, it is very advanced and gives great results. I think canon/sony does something internally in this regard. They are better for sure but we really dont know how much better.
  14. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Juxx989 in Ursa mini 4.6k - Yamaha Grizzly ATV in slomo   
    Hi, couple days ago just for fun i shot this awesome yamaha grizzly ATV, ursa mini 4.6K in raw 3:1, 4.6k 50/60fps and 2k 120fps. I used canon 16-35 f2.8 L II and canon 70-200 f2.8 II IS lenses. I recorded everything to ssd drive via cfast to sata breakout cable. 70-200 shots are handheld, for 16-35 i used glidecam devin graham signature series. Graded in resolve 12.5, edited in premiere CC.
     
     
  15. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Riadnasla in Ursa mini 4.6k - Yamaha Grizzly ATV in slomo   
    It is very good but it is also thanks to 5x slower motion plus stability of quite heavy camera - my setup weights 4,7kg (ursa with ssd "module", small battery and 70-200 lens). 
  16. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Geoff CB in Ursa mini 4.6k - Yamaha Grizzly ATV in slomo   
    Hi, couple days ago just for fun i shot this awesome yamaha grizzly ATV, ursa mini 4.6K in raw 3:1, 4.6k 50/60fps and 2k 120fps. I used canon 16-35 f2.8 L II and canon 70-200 f2.8 II IS lenses. I recorded everything to ssd drive via cfast to sata breakout cable. 70-200 shots are handheld, for 16-35 i used glidecam devin graham signature series. Graded in resolve 12.5, edited in premiere CC.
     
     
  17. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Santiago de la Rosa in URSA mini 4.6K with glidecam   
    Hi, these are my two ursa mini 4.6k recent test videos:
     
     
  18. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from mercer in URSA mini 4.6K with glidecam   
    Hi, these are my two ursa mini 4.6k recent test videos:
     
     
  19. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Cary Knoop in Blackmagic production 4k with glidecam   
    Just testing my new camera. Glidecam DGS works great with it as well as samsung 500GB evo850 SSDs.
  20. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Dan Wake in 12 or 10-bit RAW Magic Lantern!!!!   
    Fine resolution settings - i mean there is ability to change recording resolution in smaller steps, around 30 pixels or so.. Normally it was 2880 x something and next 3540 x something, now you can choose many options in between. So you had continous 2880 and than couple of seconds of 3540. Now it is very nice to adjust horizontal resolution precisely. I use 5d3 and it has no problems with pink artifacts, i dont know about 7d but i think it doesnt have fully working version yet. And i use old version of mlvfs on pc - the one with pismo, i just quick-mount mlvs and open them in resolve, no extracting.
  21. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Taranis in 12 or 10-bit RAW Magic Lantern!!!!   
    I have done some measurments of recording times with the newest build (with fine resolution settings)
    Everything tested with 24fps 10bit on 5d3 113, CF sandisk extreme pro 128gb 160mb/s. 1320 is the maximum vertical resolution for 5d3 when recording raw video.

    3168x1320 2.40:1 (1.81x crop) - 14 sec

    3104x1320 2.35:1 (1.85x crop) - 18 sec
    3104x1298 2.39:1 (1.85x crop) - 21 sec

    3008x1280 2.35:1 (1.91x crop) - 38 sec
    3008x1258 2.39:1 (1.91x crop) - 56 sec

    2976x1266 2.35:1 (1.93x crop) - 60 sec
    2976x1246 2.39:1 (1.93x crop) - 123 sec

    2880x1226 2.35:1 (2x crop) - continous

    And wider aspect ratios - just for fun:

    3520x1320 2.67:1 (1,63x crop) - 6 sec
    3296x1320 2.50:1 (1.74x crop) - 12 sec

    Now I would like to see the comparison: 5d3 vs 5d4 - raw 10bit 3008x1258 (quite usable recording time - 56 sec) vs MJPEG 8bit 4k. Not so much different crops - 1.91x 5d3 vs 1.7x 5d4. Similar bitrates. That would be very interesting.
  22. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Dan Wake in 12 or 10-bit RAW Magic Lantern!!!!   
    I have done some measurments of recording times with the newest build (with fine resolution settings)
    Everything tested with 24fps 10bit on 5d3 113, CF sandisk extreme pro 128gb 160mb/s. 1320 is the maximum vertical resolution for 5d3 when recording raw video.

    3168x1320 2.40:1 (1.81x crop) - 14 sec

    3104x1320 2.35:1 (1.85x crop) - 18 sec
    3104x1298 2.39:1 (1.85x crop) - 21 sec

    3008x1280 2.35:1 (1.91x crop) - 38 sec
    3008x1258 2.39:1 (1.91x crop) - 56 sec

    2976x1266 2.35:1 (1.93x crop) - 60 sec
    2976x1246 2.39:1 (1.93x crop) - 123 sec

    2880x1226 2.35:1 (2x crop) - continous

    And wider aspect ratios - just for fun:

    3520x1320 2.67:1 (1,63x crop) - 6 sec
    3296x1320 2.50:1 (1.74x crop) - 12 sec

    Now I would like to see the comparison: 5d3 vs 5d4 - raw 10bit 3008x1258 (quite usable recording time - 56 sec) vs MJPEG 8bit 4k. Not so much different crops - 1.91x 5d3 vs 1.7x 5d4. Similar bitrates. That would be very interesting.
  23. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from samuel.cabral in 12 or 10-bit RAW Magic Lantern!!!!   
    I have done some measurments of recording times with the newest build (with fine resolution settings)
    Everything tested with 24fps 10bit on 5d3 113, CF sandisk extreme pro 128gb 160mb/s. 1320 is the maximum vertical resolution for 5d3 when recording raw video.

    3168x1320 2.40:1 (1.81x crop) - 14 sec

    3104x1320 2.35:1 (1.85x crop) - 18 sec
    3104x1298 2.39:1 (1.85x crop) - 21 sec

    3008x1280 2.35:1 (1.91x crop) - 38 sec
    3008x1258 2.39:1 (1.91x crop) - 56 sec

    2976x1266 2.35:1 (1.93x crop) - 60 sec
    2976x1246 2.39:1 (1.93x crop) - 123 sec

    2880x1226 2.35:1 (2x crop) - continous

    And wider aspect ratios - just for fun:

    3520x1320 2.67:1 (1,63x crop) - 6 sec
    3296x1320 2.50:1 (1.74x crop) - 12 sec

    Now I would like to see the comparison: 5d3 vs 5d4 - raw 10bit 3008x1258 (quite usable recording time - 56 sec) vs MJPEG 8bit 4k. Not so much different crops - 1.91x 5d3 vs 1.7x 5d4. Similar bitrates. That would be very interesting.
  24. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from hyalinejim in 12 or 10-bit RAW Magic Lantern!!!!   
    Exactly, 10 and 12 bits are just a great tools, for me ability to shot 14bits and then drop to 12bit to record 50fps continously with 16:9 aspect is just great. I have also tried 65fps and get 12 seconds of 10bit raw 65fps 16:9 -  it would be just a great addon in situation when 37% slomo is needed
  25. Like
    kgv5 got a reaction from Dan Wake in 12 or 10-bit RAW Magic Lantern!!!!   
    I will do this little bit later, i expect there will be less ability to recover shadows/highligts especially in 10 bits - but as a tool - 10bit is gladly welcome. I am very excited because of usable 50/60 fps in 16:9 aspect. There are also 11 and 13 bits settings, i have to also try them.
×
×
  • Create New...