Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by liork

  1. 11 hours ago, Mattias Burling said:

    Anyone with a Canon RP that can shoot some HD and share the file? Or anyone seen any HD samples online from someone that knows what they are doing?

    I need to buy a b-camera for work. Will be used a lot for video so the R is still the perfect match from what I've seen. But the RP seems to have the same readout as the R with absolutely no rolling shutter as well as the in body stabilization and of course the colors. 

    But I wonder if it's the same HD file as the 6Dmkii? If so I might as well go for the 6Dmkii or another R. Curious to see if the new processor has stepped it up.

    I've searched but not found much HD footage. Anyone else seen any or have the camera?

    In body stabilization? Only digital one with more crop, no IBIS.

  2. 10 minutes ago, Kisaha said:

    Great! And it is 300€ less in my country, isn't it a little old though?

    Do you have any other suggestions? Maybe a Dell or Samsung?

    I am reading a lot of QC issues for the BenQ.

    Maybe it is "old" (from last year...) but it has HDMI 2.0, DCI P3 and even HDR 10 if you need it. I Don't know any Samsung PC monitor that is aimed at pro video editing.

  3. 5 hours ago, mirekti said:

    Nice. I am not sure if I fully understand Benq's line. Their "photographer" line also covers AdobeRGB. When I compare it to their "videographer" line, it looks the same, but with more color space. I mean, I don't see that PV line has something that SW doesn't, and it is better for video compared to SW line. ?

    At the moment it's either the one you have or SW271.
    SW271 is a bit smaller, but it should be enough as it will only be used as a reference monitor connected via BM's Intensity Pro 4k so 32 might actually be an overkill. 

    The 3200 model does not support DCI P3 which is a shame for this price and the HDMI is only 1.4 verson = 30Hz.

    This one is nice: https://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-32UD99-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor

  4. 36 minutes ago, Django said:

     PAL movie settings:

    4K (16:9) 3840 x 2160 (25, 23.98 fps) intra frame 7 
    4K Time-lapse (16:9) 3840 x 2160 (29.97, 25 fps) All-I 
    Full HD (16:9) 1920 x 1080 (59.94, 50, 29.97, 25 fps) intra frame, intra frame lite (29.97, 25 fps) 

    NTSC movie settings:

    4K 3840 x 2160: 23.98fps
    Full HD 1920 x 1080: 59.94fps/29.97fps

    HD 1280 x 720: 59.94fps/29.97fps


    Maybe the CPU is so weak it cannot do 30p.

  5. 1 minute ago, androidlad said:

    What Sony did was a significant algorithm overhaul, it's a software feature hence can be realised with a firmware update. Theoretically Canon can do the same.

    It requires also a fast strong CPU. This is the reason why the A7/RIII will get only Real time Eye focus, not the full tracking.

  6. 2 hours ago, sanveer said:

    Or better still, they could just get CFexpress cards with blistering read/write speeds of 1,400MB/s and 1,000MB/s.

    Well, the Nikon Z is getting CFexpress support through firmware upgrade.

  7. 15 minutes ago, mercer said:

    It’s all relative. I don’t need FF 4K up to 60p at a low bitrate with paid upgrades. I don’t need a questionable AF system. I don’t need a camera that has possible overheating issues.

    But when I do decide to get another camera, I would like IBIS and I’d like to use my existing EF lenses with a dependable AF system... hopefully Canon offers all of these features in an upcoming model.

    But again, my original comment was just a statement against all recent camera releases. They’re just boring. Until these cameras offer internal/external Raw/ProRes they seem to be minor upgrades where picking your poison out of a hat is a valid reason to choose one over the other... or base it on the lenses you already own. 

    Do you need 4K at all?

  • Create New...