Emanuel

I concur, this one produces one of the best results as far as IQ concerns I've ever seen for its segment, even above.

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?134930-Best-ND-Variable-Filter-(that-doesn-t-cast-color-or-soften-image) http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?116985-Questions-about-Neutral-Density-Filters!! http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?92036-Variable-ND-Filters http://www.bmcuser.com/showthread.php?283-Neutral-Density-Filters-options

Perhaps not on a7SIII, but sooner or later they will need to follow Panasonic. Long life to the company founded by Matsushita! You're shooting your own feet, Wolf, if you're thinking you can or should ignore the new GH series toy.

When are people able to understand centrism as moderate viewpoint of the whole humankind in general has won the plea?! For some good reason, right? ; ) The whole point, dudes, is the trend to extreme standpoints. To each its own. What about a mid term? That is, when both worlds can coexist altogether. Manual from film and analog environments don't necessarily mean absence of any sort of automation if this will bring some advantage. New jobs will be required for focus pullers. Upcoming techniques can't be stopped because people need to make bucks for living. Go and get a new life! -- stop for once to be morons... Maybe, that's only me but, coming from Steenbecks, I am fully done with these pseudo-film-PROs trying to convince the world they still lead something or someone in this industry. Anyways, on the other hand, this can't be read as you'll have a button able to decide what to put in focus or into the frame, c'mon... : P *Sigh* What about peaking and some other features such as tap to focus or the new touch pull/follow focus aid brought by GH5 to set the point up? ;-)

Yeah, RED has tried to invent the concept, Panasonic has done it. Hybrid is the future.

Well, at least you have it on the Atomos Shogun (BTW, ridiculous name of) Inferno...

I bet any 8-bit 4:2:0 artifacts can be overcome on HDMI 10-bit going on much higher bitrate with external recording... I just am not sure I had understood it well, hey, Simo: Atomos much better than the Blackmagic's external recording device? Why should it be so? So strange that. Saluti, E :-)

Politics is part of life, almost as much as your/our/Andrew's fav cam/film/shot is. We just can't live outside of the bubble for longer than our legs. Inner circles don't help, it doesn't matter whether the side you are. 'Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.' ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Right. Not worse enough, but worst... ;-)

http://www.photobyrichard.com/reviewbyrichard/panasonic-lumix-gh5-queenstown-tour-2017/

Glad to finally see it :-)

What do they have in common? The set? ; ) Apples to oranges here as far as aesthetics concerns... And naturally, I don't even mean the acquisition side, really ;-) (some dozens of thousands in-between don't make much of that difference, subject-wise, like it or not : ) I guess, both of them (a short-film-test vs just-a-test, by this chronological order) match the market segments within. Some fairness on the tools, after all :-)

Got your point. Not a youtuber here, though. To my eyes, it simply fits the subject.

Lovely shots, competently photographed and edited.

That video was not representative then, once that's high ISOs domain, much noisy than a cleaner output on less sensitive realm. I haven't found much trouble from 8-bit 4:2:0 when well exposed other than banding, the truly embarrassing hassle to fit low bit rates.

Actually, high ISOs ain't nothing recommendable at all on GH series, even sensor size apart... BTW, neither Blackmagics.

Well said. The benefit can be mostly testified at the big screen.

Your bets for tonight?

IMHO, the trouble on this camera is far beyond to be... 10-bit 4:2:2 LOL but latitude, DR. A few samples clearly show it. Once again, on the shooter... Nothing more, period. (even the high ISOs coupled to denoising attempts by the camera maker to mimic larger sensor size competition can be disappointing but it is meaningless...) C'mon, that's ridiculous! Anyways, only talent will be the last frontier. Never these devices of nowadays, at this level. End of story :-)

: D Well pointed out :-)

I always appreciate to know the camera I work with... call me picky (not necessarily pixel peeper : D all the time, at least hehe) I recall the finest example that our woman is always the most attractive female for us or it should be ;-)