Emanuel

I don't think there's anything strange on videos like this one here: https://vimeo.com/244689449 Besides the fact the owner seems pretty legit: https://vimeo.com/worksmanuelpalma/videos As much as the previous one BTW... They've just added their shaky side-by-side sample only not sync with. That's it. Hence to look like wider. Yes, it is. Not TC sync there. The first user also had some parts to really scream for a stab hand so... Everything seems fine to my eyes so far. Even though I had seen only those.

[PS] Without mention ISO2500 (my fav top end and one of mine too) is one of their natives; BTW this dual ISO stuff is not proper of a consumer device (our old chap Don @webrunner5 is pretty accurate on the spot when properly calls it a game changer) as much as their 10-bit high bitrate codec bonus but now by default with the whole dynamic range at disposal on their high end too, well well... Well tempting.

Zak, my bet is that overprocessed sharpness on GH5 also comes from its 20MP high rezzed sensor as even anamorphic samples from there show it. So the stuff must be calmer down this time, my guess. Hope not to be too naive here. I've found blur as a good workaround though. Odd to admit it. E :-)

Right Jon! I've also crossed that with the fact Andrew has referred himself to erroneous yadda yadda from rumors before the announcement to conclude that makes too little to none sense at all. I also was convinced about that despite to tend feeling it strange when they are strong competitors, as shows my earlier posting. Perhaps a sign of good cooperation towards a new technological age not too much tagged by their core business ...?!! *cough cough* :-)

Again?? Can you @Andrew Reid clear up if you hold any information on it please? Is this Sony's the GH5S sensor? It doesn't make sense at all with that interview where Yosuke Yamane-san, the Panasonic's head of imaging himself says they got the whole thing there.

They could always implement to switch it off as user wishes, isn't it? I'm sorry but I don't buy the technical explanation as second thought. How many GH5 units they would fail to sell from now on? That's the whole business model (industry breathes strategy) which made their decision to leave IBIS out of range to my eyes. Let a7SIII settles down if coupled to some stabilization all included with and we'll see if they won't be in rush to sort the GH6s out just in time to comprehend the IBIS factor. Hybrid oblige. In any case, this camera is out of the concept so serves as excuse. Let's only not to accept that as granted.

+1 Cinema is inaccurate coloring the world... ;-)

C'mon... the gal flawed your evaluation ; ) Don't fool y/ourself(ves;-)

But, is this the Starvis sensor at all? I don't think so from that Cinema 5D interview there with Yosuke Yamane-san: I don't understand Japanese but if the subtitles translation is accurate, I'd tend to believe and confirm Panasonic is Sony's competitor instead. And... period. Also Andrew Reid's remarks on eventual BS misinformation spread along the rumors led me to infer it is not actually. :-)

I follow and appreciate your entry. Really. As said, only my bet though : ) Maybe from a few of decades doing business, with such big guys included.

No idea if I should be happy or sad...

I also thought that in the early beginning but thinking twice, I now guess they simply didn't want to cannibalize the older sister and native GH5. Sad but that's my finest bet. They would certainly find a way of it and I still bet they will adopt it for the upcoming GH6S.

As early adopter, David, not anymore nowadays. How could I? A decade later anno Domini (AD), I mean, when we celebrate 10 years of 5DII ; ) with a 2009 unit purchase I still keep with me... That's exactly the whole point addressed to that young fellow... GH5/GH5S is/are the best valuable cinema camera offer available today for 4500 bucks and you still get two bodies ; )) being one of them a fully hybrid acquisition device ;-) AFAIK those serial numbers are with RED now, so they were not allocated with a different user. RED, Canon were my choices when in 2010 I bought 2x GH1. When not only as very personal recommendation of my own, I've actually produced features, documentaries and shorts, etc shot on RED, ARRI, Blackmagics, Canons Cxxx line and some other DSLRs but since then, I never looked back as my most inner option :-)

Didn't check the official footage, but that one apparently comes from some user, so it should be reliable enough, no? :-)

https://steadxp.com/

It's a steal as matter of fact. Just wondering where and why they charge a premium (5x VLog add-on) for a bit less when they've subtracted IBIS from their original GH5 package. When we'll probably see it in a couple of years with the upcoming GH6s.

haha well put, pal, I told you, your hilarious entries have gotten me! :-) Done with my quota of likes for today, here's my public/personal thanks for so interesting info added here, Jon :-) That's quite of a camera this beast Panasonic has invented for more than half a grand they should charge for, I say. Tell me about another manufacturer offering Dual Native ISO under 5 digits and a 2nd camera model for a fraction (a quarter BTW) of it, Glenn! @mercer That NY noiseless footage has sold me enough for my pre-order or whatever they call it. So long 500 bucks! :-D

hehe ;-) Don, great find! (y) Chance to add my vote for Andrew starting to adopt the real names policy à la reduser forum. And increase the daily quota for more than a dozen of likes restriction BTW (I've just spent my last one with Don, sorry Glenn! :-)

No, buddy, because I use my 1st real name too, other than referring you by your family name instead and know your posts for a considerable time now : ) No hard feelings mate, I'm used to read you for awhile and address you as well some other usual suspects <3 here : )) Well, what am I mentioning here? Nothing you hadn't noticed it before, isn't it my dear fellow of these boards? :-)

hehe you and your Canons... :D I agree with your 1st paragraph ; ) be careful with copyrights but once it is also your opinion you should be fine :-) oh God, each post from yours, a pearl by its own... : ) I rest my case! :-) Save your energy to handhold your 8-year used RED ONE MX instead :-D - RED ONEs #111 & #647

@mercer Glenn again, your answers are always funny and invariably pretty paradoxical... Take a look: "Lowlight is a marketing buzz word. I can get clean 1600 ISO on an f/2 lens with my 5D3 and acceptable 3200 with a 1.4... nothing a little Neat Video won’t clean up" Very well. So, see your part II now: "Sorry, it should have read... ...the GH5s is as good in lowlight as FF, especially the a7s." Right. I forgot the 1st part of your own: "And yeah, Speedboosters are cool but honestly, I am sooo tired of adapters. I have two boxes full of adapters in my closet" So? There's no free soup without camera accessories, my friend, for any shooter, no matter what you're interested or not ;-)

Sir Adam Wilt, so to speak ;-)

Don't sweat it! There will always be naysayers... ; ) Finding anything to try proving your grass is less greener. @mercer Glenn, time to book your GH5 series driving test! Lucky boy, they only released two versions! ;-)

Fanboyism is almost a miracle without grace ; ) Go Canon go! They say Panasonic "brings massive low light improvement" on dual native ISO. Before, the excuse were the skintones or the typical sensor size specs of a smaller format as 4/3". Now in times of SB and accurate VLog and other tricks, what else? ;-)

GH6s ;-)