Emanuel

Indeed. That's my point exactly. If you're happy with, why to move along? : ) I have to be pretty sincere on here. I normally resist to trade in my tools for the newest promise to keep up the vibe. To me the secret is always on combos. That's just my weak point :-D Speaking of devil, 5D2 only had two flaws: DSLR form factor (I did the move to the GH series to begin with the GH1 and never looked back in any way other than as when ML RAW popped up) and aliasing/moiré. The latter one much prone to overcome with the proper handy skillful workarounds. We did a feature film with (even before ML hack) becoming a web series too later, at least:

Yes, it's true : ) Funny question... I've just posted a new thread on topic: I have enrolled myself in some productions (mostly narrative, aside a few docs or experimental stuff when happens) of other people, although in sabbatical retirement these last two years. When and where I've practically dedicated myself to photography as personal path of my own or funding new projects to come next year or to luckily start in the end of this year. Let's see what happens... :-) 5DII, earlier GH series' offer and G7 by this chronological order with or another exception aside, as shooter.

What's your current personal camera nowadays?

Not yet Glenn, I have so many cameras over my desk, I can't decide to quit from any of them yet. But, I surely will ;-)

Not bad at all... :-)

A new one from Jurek (stoneinapound here):

Because there's a new distribution model nowadays based in your personal display, no matter the size of it (resolution matters... : D).

Indeed. They did a bigger leap, just not exactly forward in order to keep the regulars there as myself for example. Why not? Netflix is currently the most successful major out there...

@jcs John as former chap from there where we met for 1st time I guess, what's your currently opinion on cinema5d BTW? I'd love to hear it...

Even though, we can be the only ones to know we're going in the right path, at times. It happens too often.

Indeed. We fully stand all of this as y'all know. The most unique lens going with GH5 for sure. There's nothing not even close to this combo out there. This is the perfect cinematic S35 combo.

Well put, Andrew : ) Frank Glencairn is a reputable shooter for so many years... Fellow reduser as for instance. He deserves full support and all the trust. I'll surely be one of his backers. I fully recommend his efforts and initiative. https://vimeo.com/user1323085 @Frank Glencairn (hi Frank!), all sort of tablets based on same OS, as well, correct?

I fully agree anyways. Even about the first test between the bad (subject, as for instance) and good (also a couple of shots can show us there's way beyond under underexposed techniques included) without mention where production values for the second example can really be not embarrassed by the camera used by the shooter anymore: it's all about potentiality. Not exactly the course that has been done but where it can be done. That's precisely the point. When it's not the device anymore to limit your craft : ) Oh yes, good cinematography is midway to that path.

Dedicated to all those who are willing to find eoshd a digital world of online brotherhood as usual and always should be... from the vulgarity of the jungle where we all live. Inspired by Paul (that guy up there) and some other good fellows a century ago who made History without mention back today our (@jcs) John Schultz of course... ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_truce

That's why I've always appreciated steady shots, I guess ;-)

Gotcha. I stand. Andrew should elect more staff. My vote for you.

Yeah dude, I get the point it is useless starting to guess from online appearances instead ; ) That's the whole point IMO (rather than the usual full IMHO version BTW). But, when I read people pretending they're trying to make a point (to the others) when there's something else in the package, I see on that one, at least, you're right. Hence my 'funny post' remark ;-)

: D Funny post. BTW put me out of there... LOL ;-)

Reason why rule #1: never do online the stuff you are unable to perform in the rest of the world because digital is part within. So, ad hominem attacks should have no place on both sides of same coin. Nor confrontational vibe is welcome especially when you wouldn't repeat it if/when face to face. The world is not perfect either. Apology is part of our ecosystem though.

I understand your disappointment but maybe you had misunderstood me or you had lost my previous posting here, I guess mate. To my view, all this is nonsense. Jon is cool. Ed is cool. People only have different personalities, only that. What's new to see here? I agree with you anyway... people need to chill out in fact. Otherwise, perhaps you need to open more mod candidacies, I bet. The forum has grown up since those days you were a dvxuser poster. And as you reasonably posted before, harmony, balance is a good way to stand the thing. :-) Exactly. Well said, Axel. The problem stands when people tend to see their own side as the right one... Or the other side is fully wrong. *sigh* As Anthony wisely posted, "lynch mob is a microcosm of the world"... The whole world indeed ; ) unfortunately.

Right. What about people and the whole town staring their eyes on the eclipse instead...? Something which puzzles me every solar eclipse is the attempt people go to mimic the same reproduced on and on by many others. Not bad at all to see people faces going to and from darkness, actually.

LOL Right @Andrew Reid, give Ed the power and end of story. Well BTW, feel free to elect me so, as well. I am all peace and love, good contributor y'know, go figure, I don't mind to be mod too : ) Not fair for Jon's hard work though :-)