Emanuel

I understand your disappointment but maybe you had misunderstood me or you had lost my previous posting here, I guess mate. To my view, all this is nonsense. Jon is cool. Ed is cool. People only have different personalities, only that. What's new to see here? I agree with you anyway... people need to chill out in fact. Otherwise, perhaps you need to open more mod candidacies, I bet. The forum has grown up since those days you were a dvxuser poster. And as you reasonably posted before, harmony, balance is a good way to stand the thing. :-) Exactly. Well said, Axel. The problem stands when people tend to see their own side as the right one... Or the other side is fully wrong. *sigh* As Anthony wisely posted, "lynch mob is a microcosm of the world"... The whole world indeed ; ) unfortunately.

Right. What about people and the whole town staring their eyes on the eclipse instead...? Something which puzzles me every solar eclipse is the attempt people go to mimic the same reproduced on and on by many others. Not bad at all to see people faces going to and from darkness, actually.

LOL Right @Andrew Reid, give Ed the power and end of story. Well BTW, feel free to elect me so, as well. I am all peace and love, good contributor y'know, go figure, I don't mind to be mod too : ) Not fair for Jon's hard work though :-)

LOL 2K @ 2.39:1 DCI ratio = 2048×858 pixels 4K @ 2.39:1 DCI ratio = 4096×1716 pixels https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Initiatives Well, Jim & Jarred's camera company website has more interesting information on topic: http://www.red.com/learn/red-101/video-aspect-ratios "Note: many say 2.39:1, 2.40:1 (“two-four-oh”) or 2.35:1, but nowadays these typically all refer to the same 2.39:1 aspect ratio. 2.35:1 was an earlier SMTPE widescreen standard prior to 1970, and two-four-oh is just an incorrect rounding from 2.39:1 to 2.40:1 instead of to 2.4:1." BTW, here's something other related there: http://www.red.com/learn/red-101/anamorphic-lenses

Hot thread... Chill out guys and gals ; ) Let's keep it up a little bit at least, we are all friends over Andrew's home :-)

Great post, man... : ) My hat :-)

Correct. That's exactly my point. Good camera slowmo performance should also follow up... ; ) As well, 'sunny faces' to begin with. But on topic you are fish in the water... So ; )) That said, this camera is perhaps the most balanced capture device ever :-)

No idea, not my stuff. I guess so though.

Really... I never thought to have read on topic in XXI century: pathetic path of History : (

Simple but effective with very cheap glass (kit 14-42mm and 20mm f1.7 pancake lenses), go figure... Sunny face BTW ;-)

I didn't read anything at all. I just don't like to read anything on topic. It is like to discuss disability or alike, etc. Is there any sense or reason for?

This white versus black whatever color talk is completely nonsense and primitive.

Well, GH5 rules above all of them... LOL Give me some other one to let you have 4K60p or internal 10bit 4:2:2 in that range ;-)

Yeah, the shooter is anything... :-)

Hey Glenn, have you seen my last post on GH5 footage from Atomos coupled with? That's my fav cinema camera...

Indeed. 56... LOL So back to single version :-D

Right. And buy :-D

Well, I guess his unit is not better than yours... : D Here's another interesting GH5 sample on something we're used to see from much more bucks than 2 mere grands: To me and... really, there's no other similar offer. End of story.

Alternate that with wide angle stuff y'know and you'll reach it even further... ;-)

Teal and orange? *cough cough* LOL :-)

Updated there -- just follow the links : ) More shallow DOF, you say? You can match both GH5 and a6300 / a6500 using a Metabones / Speedbooster type adapter or going with faster glass (large apertures). Other than that, go on Sony's APS-C sensor size camp.

Filmmaking is a combination of circumstances for sure. But, I don't think it is the case of glass here, we both bet ; ) To my eyes, the secret there is on post production, I'd say. Once he says he's not using any NR on post, I guess grading can help him out too. Without mention he refers he's overexposing V-log 1-2 stops in-camera, so maybe that's there a good trick to handle it. Have you already tested the tip?