gelaxstudio

Why this has to be personal, did I offend you somehow？
I did not judge your personality
 

If this is not moire ,what else it can be?
You can disagree with me,or make your own review to prove Dpreview done a wrong test .
And I am not making fake news here,all I did is posted some screenshots of Dpreview‘s website and share some of my thoughts baseed on what I saw
If this is something bullshit or something  misleading，try tell that to the Dpreview ，not me
Right，if I done something wrong ，I will  apologize and stop posting wrong materials

Yeah I actually laughed when the Canon came in last yet was voted to have potentially the best. Michael the Maven always does blind color test when comparing cameras.
Good comment someone left on the video "This is a great video, really shows that people are loyal to the brand, not the color!"
 
Can't wait to hear/read all of the salt and anger this video brings.

Very, very good video.
 

Iphones are made in china，no problems for Apple
The only thing that matter is quality control

Hi @gelaxstudio
You can simply do that through an HDMI output screen monitor. You can also use the Panasonic image app in the app store/play store, to see in live (use your phone/tablet) as a monitor.
Unfortunately, there are no others ways. You can do server delivery, so each time you make a video or take a picture, it is directly sent to a server which will be stocked in your computer.
 
Hope this helped.
 

Just stop making excuses for canon not to involve or even try harder
what if the EOS-R II comes out tomorrow ,and still do 4K with a crop 
Canon just tell everyone that some  pro users  did some tests and proved the IQ as good as the supersampling one,forget the fXXking  supersampling , you don't need it!
 
 

even the sharpened Eos R file is missing some detail in comparison. The small branches on the right are easily distinguishable in the Fuji image, but neither in Canons unsharpened nor oversharpened image.
But I agree with the generell idea, that sharpness nowadays is way overrated and there are many things that are more important. 
At the same time I don't get, why anyone should praise the Canon for things that it's not. This is the reason why canon gets away with a lot of awful decisions 

Once again Andrew you're blinded by your inherent Canon bias. 

I turn down sharpness all the way but I never add sharpening in post. Same with photos. 

The bad thing about canon is their 120fps is pretty poor. I think Canon's 4k is nice. Their 1080 tends to be really noticeably softer even without punching in. Thats where the problem is for me. Haven't seen any 1080 EOS R stuff yet or at least not comparisons. 

Max Yurye had upload a side by side IQ comparison video of X-T3 vs A7III vs EOS R vs Z7 vs Pocket 4K ，and the 4K  on eos r looks like 1080p upscaled，and the 1080p looks like 720p upscaled，any brand which still using line-skipping 1080P，now just canon ，like what they did  10 years ago
And  I know some people can  still call it cinematic  looks
 
 

World’s fastest autofocus ，but no AF-C in continuous high drive，haha

World’s fastest autofocus ，but no AF-C in continuous high drive，haha

Today ， every other brand kill canon，even fuji do far better video than some Canon C series  Cameras
Soon panasonic will join the FF war and give us a great FF camera with tones of nice 4K video Features
Just forget Canon , jumpship to other brand that offer what you need，even Canon is dead now，nobody will feel  that is a pity！
Stop wasting  your time ，guys
 

The DPreview had tested the GH5S,and its DR is around 11.3EV，quite the same as the  A7RIII(which  is  limited by its bit)
It looks like 10bit won't help carrying out all the DR？

A time-travel DSLR ,date back to 2008,so  cool

m50  has a 1.6x crop when shooting 4k,that's about 2.5x crop from a  ff  sensor.
And dual pixel AF is not available when shooting 4k, the Contrast AF is very slow
more over, the battery life is terribly short 
Why Canon keep making those weird  things?

m50  has a 1.6x crop when shooting 4k,that's about 2.5x crop from a  ff  sensor.
And dual pixel AF is not available when shooting 4k, the Contrast AF is very slow
more over, the battery life is terribly short 
Why Canon keep making those weird  things?

Sure there are a lot of people like that.
And I see the potential buyer getting ripped off to be quite honest...

These are the current cheapest new interchangeable lens cameras in the UK at WEX...
A reminder of all that the GX800 gives the customer, including 4K
https://www.panasonic.com/uk/consumer/cameras-camcorders/lumix-g-compact-system-cameras/dc-gx800.html

Whereas the 1300D is practically 2008's low-end technology.

It only needs 3 improvement：PDAF 、10bit & no rolling shutter

Of course，I use headphone for monitoring audio level and check if there is any bad BG nosie 

Exactly. I wish more people would realise this.
Heck, the 50D was capable of video and even had a microphone designed in it for video. But Canon didn't go ahead with it.
Was only the Nikon D90 which finally *forced* Canon to add video to their next DSLRs.
Perhaps now the D500 & D7500 (& the next D5x00 update?? & the D750 mk2? Plus of course the D900 will have 4K) has got 4K, then that will finally force Canon to bring out 4K to their future camera releases.
Once again, it is Nikon (not Canon) who is leading the slow push forward with DSLR innovations.

We should see canon cameras in museums, not stores.

Canon announced  a time travel DSLR that takes you back to the 2008~So amazing，right？

I wonder why no one says spec does not means everything ~
BTW，it has canon colour！That is all you need

Andrew I could not freaking agree more! This is a ridiculous situation. Coming from film, then super early video (Betamax, HI8, MiniDV) and then the 5dMKII it literally seems like canon hasn't moved since 2009.  The 6D MK II was really there last chance in my opinion to make one hell of a camera for the full frame entry level market.... and what do they do? Pull the same stupid shit they've done the last 7 years... this is why I left Canon a long time ago and am happy straddling the sony/panasonic playing field. what Canon doesn't understand is nobody wants to buy 4 c200's when you can buy 1 c200 and like 3 5dmkV's or 4 6dmkIIs that have 4K 60p, 10bit 422 and get amazing quality while having multiple cameras that dont break the bank.. but of course no, Canon once again cripple their users and I just cant stand it. Ive said goodbye to my canon bodies and haven't look back. If color science and 'dual pixel af' are the ONLY things canon is offering that is worthwhile.... then no thanks I'll be happy right where i'm at with Sony and Panasonic and now the upcoming EVA1