Jump to content

gelaxstudio

Members
  • Content Count

    191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About gelaxstudio

  • Rank
    Active member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. gelaxstudio

    Color science

    In fact,none of those online tests or website tests I seen proved they are using the best colour settings for their cameras,just defult settings for comparisons is stupid Who will always using defult settings ? If one camera on defult settings provide bad results,then claim it has bad colour science That is unfair and not scientific If I am using sony with EOS pro colour setting VS defult settings on a canon camera,and their image looks totally the same ,can I claim they both have the same colour science? What about cine colours on GH5,film simulations on fuji cameras? There are many potential possibilities for just one camera,and I think the way we judge the colours on cameras,mostly too subjective and not in a fair way I can also do a blind test on this topic Can you identify which pic is the canon?
  2. Iphones are made in china,no problems for Apple The only thing that matter is quality control
  3. Here is a good example of showing you what fanboy BS is Well done,Tony Colour science will soon be a out dated topic ,lol
  4. Does someone know how to create a web live workflow by using GH4 or GH5?
  5. man,why dislike canon is a thing?I can dislike any brand I what Why do you care someone anti-canon or not?Did I hurt your feeling? I am a panasonic and sony user now,I was using canon cameras 7 years ago ,5D2 and 500D was my main camera, I was shooting wedding and ads back that time,but damn I dislike canon so much when they keep making overpriced crippled cameras after A7S came out If canon throw something better than sony at the same price,I will definitely shut my mouth Before that,I will keep making criticisms to this brand that disrespect its users Let the brand making better product to justify itself,not some fanboy BS
  6. Not only some youtubers misunderstand sharpness as resolution,but they are trying to prove the crop 4K is as good as the supersampling or the non-crop ones,Canon must be so happy seeing they making excuses to justify their crippled products Hell yeah, as you guys wish ,Canon will keep that crop 4K forever,lol
  7. Just stop making excuses for canon not to involve or even try harder what if the EOS-R II comes out tomorrow ,and still do 4K with a crop Canon just tell everyone that some pro users did some tests and proved the IQ as good as the supersampling one,forget the fXXking supersampling , you don't need it!
  8. If a sharpened 1:1 pixel readout image can as detail as the super-sampling image,why any brand even bother to make super-sampling 4K? Even line-skipping will be enough for all camera,including cinema camera That's ridiculous Sharpness ≠ detail is already been proved in max's video,Z7 is a in-camera sharpened image without any extra detail
  9. Actually I mean the 1080P and 720P is line-skipping,but the 4K on EOS R ,it really very soft and lack of details when compare with other 1:1 pixel readout 4K cameras I think the soft image is caused by the smaller size pixel. The bigger the crop is,the smaller size pixel it gets,like the D5,which is also very soft,but still a little bit better than canon. The full sensor 1:1 readout looks really great,well balance between resolution and rolling-shutter performance,IMO
  10. the image in focus looks like out of focus ,because it is still line-skipping I think max is using the right settings,if using log,some camera will lose resolution(like the A7III) Sampling is what real matter, seriously,the C100 and the old GH2 only 24M bit-rate,but producing mush better image than any canon DSLR Resolution is not sharpness,just been proved by the z7 in this video,the in-camera sharpping does not show more usable details The fact is canon still using line-skipping for the eos r,which is a waste of the sensor and the lens,if GH series is using line-skipping,I think no one will buy it and say it is cinematic
  11. Max Yurye had upload a side by side IQ comparison video of X-T3 vs A7III vs EOS R vs Z7 vs Pocket 4K ,and the 4K on eos r looks like 1080p upscaled,and the 1080p looks like 720p upscaled,any brand which still using line-skipping 1080P,now just canon ,like what they did 10 years ago And I know some people can still call it cinematic looks
  12. A chinese website just posted their NIKON Z7&Z6 camera review ,including IQ 、lowlight AF、 Face detect AF、 120p Video、high ISO ect. Z7 working very well in video AF and the IQ is great,after I saw the face tracking AF in video mode,I think it performs as well as canon https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=248&t=5567307#2263207_1536522246 I translated the ending parts Pros Z7 has the same IQ as D850 in a smaller body Tilting touch LCD Face tracking AF works very well 5 stops IBIS The FTZ Mount Adapter works well The ergonomics is responsive,with multiple usable Fn buttons No crop in FF 4K and 10bit 422 output The N-log actually provides 13 stops of DR Battery life is actually last 3x more than the Nikon stated(330 shoots) Cons No enough buffer in continue shooting,only 20 fps AF fails when focus on low contrast objects No Eye AF A doughty beginner in this FF mirrorless hunger game
×
×
  • Create New...