Nikon Zr is coming

[Davide DB]

finally something different

 

 

[ND64]

Somebody discovered the h.265 softness issue is a variable bitrate bug. With Nlog its too low. It should be 320Mb/s but its 32Mb/s. They forgot a zero 🙂

[Emanuel]

On 11/23/2025 at 9:51 PM, Danyyyel said:

For now as a Nikon shooter, I am more inclined to shoot NRAW and do the renaming trick to R3D, than to shoot R3D as I am finding that the Nraw has more DR than the R3D and you can shoot the normal version that takes only about 370 mbs for 24 fps in 4k and 700 mbs for 6k. This is a little test of conversion of Nev to R3D. You have NEV (Nikon RAw), NEV but using the RED lut, Then the Nev to R3D renaming and finally the REDraw file. then  So I need to make a little bit more test, with skin tones etc, but they are quite close to me, even more so that even between the different red cameras like the Raptor and Komodo, their is some color difference. The yellow are a little bit more saturated and the image is a little more toward yellow in the Nikon ZR redraw R3D files. On side by side test the ZR was the more yellowish of the red camera. So it might balance out in the end. 

I see fair differences between them you've actually pointed out. Far to even be similar once converted unless when native perhaps, to my eyes :- )

[Andrew Reid]

On 12/1/2025 at 10:42 AM, Davide DB said:

finally something different

 

 

The comments say Nikon has such great colours, but with LOG footage the colours are up to the user not the camera.

[stephen]

We can control H265 quality in Nikon Zr and results are not bad at all. Interesting, I've never heard anybody mention this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHbq8g6dBCk 

 

[Andrew Reid]

They all look the same these cameras to me.

[ND64]

10 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

The comments say Nikon has such great colours, but with LOG footage the colours are up to the user not the camera.

It's the same "Canon makes better skin tones" superstition among photographers while we could get whatever skin tones we wanted with raw files all these years, but this time among videographers. Now convenience is part of the color science tho. If the image is just two clicks away from their perception of pleasing colors, means the camera produces great colors.

[Davide DB]

Just on this forum, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of comments about this brand or that camera having terrible colors, awful skin tones, colorw impossible to match, and now everything depend on the user?

What did I misunderstand about your comments?

Here's a simple search for you.

https://www.eoshd.com/comments/search/?&q=Colors&type=forums_topic&search_and_or=or

[Andrew Reid]

13 hours ago, Davide DB said:

Just on this forum, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of comments about this brand or that camera having terrible colors, awful skin tones, colorw impossible to match, and now everything depend on the user?

What did I misunderstand about your comments?

Here's a simple search for you.

https://www.eoshd.com/comments/search/?&q=Colors&type=forums_topic&search_and_or=or

I'm talking about LOG video, it really does depend on the user more than the camera how the colours come out, especially as the modern range of gear now have a similar high level of codecs.

So the Z-LOG = S-LOG = F-LOG they're all very much the same sort of thing.

Whenever you see this LOG footage on YouTube, it's been graded by the user, either with a LUT or with their own grading skills in Resolve. Yet all the comments are like this... WOW the camera has great colour science, blah blah blah.

And i's the same with RAW... All the sensors are now at a high level, similar dynamic range and so on. If anything they are now too good and are moving AWAY from the look of film.

As for colour science...

If you shoot JPEG or rec.709 video, then what the camera is doing matters far more.

But in LOG they are all using a very similar wide colour gamut, and similar LOG curve, similar white balance, it is only the 8bit side that still has a big variation between Film Simulations, Photo Styles and Creative Looks.

So just bear in mind next time you see footage on YouTube that the LUT is doing 99.99% of the colour you're seeing not the camera.

[Andrew Reid]

13 hours ago, ND64 said:

It's the same "Canon makes better skin tones" superstition among photographers while we could get whatever skin tones we wanted with raw files all these years, but this time among videographers. Now convenience is part of the color science tho. If the image is just two clicks away from their perception of pleasing colors, means the camera produces great colors.

Canon does do better skintones but it applies to the 8bit JPEG engine and rec.709 Standard video recording mode, it doesn't apply to LOG because the look of skintones come from the post processing side i.e. LUT.

I am amazed people don't know this haha

[Andrew Reid]

I had a play with the Nikon Zr today and quite liked it, it's a capable, good value for money Sigma-Fp style camera with very good autofocus and finally a screen with which you can see what is in focus and what isn't. Well done Japan for going large after 25 years of 3.0 inches.

It's the sort of camera that would be very exciting back in the day of the DSLR video revolution to say the least...

Nowadays though, I find other stuff more exciting.

Also the screen tilting mechanism sucks... I'd far rather they'd drop the YouTube vlog-style swivel screens on a camera like this and have a standard tilt screen that is ON AXIS with the fucking lens, and with it being so large it really feels unbalanced stuck out at the side and blocking the ports.

In a way the Zr feels like a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K but done well.

But it doesn't feel very high-end, even if the image is.

Also I miss the EVF and think the Z6 Mark III is even more bang for buck.

So yeah, doesn't set my hair on fire but it's going to be a very decent buy for a lot of people.