Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone. 
During my quest to understand how raw files work and what are the benefits of using one format over another, I never really found out a clear definitive answer. So i decided to start this topic in oder to do so.

My fundamental questions are:
A) Which raw files DON'T have baked-in white balance?
B) Is there anything as logarithmic raw files?

 And the answers I have found so fare are:
A) .ari files and Magic Lantern 14bit .dng files
B) I don't consider .MXF or .R3D files to be raw but uncompressed video therefore no. Otherwise I would say that the only logarithmic raw files are MXF files

Pretty much all other kind of raw files out there turn out not to be really raw as they claim. In my opinion, I found that working with a linear file was a safer bet against blown highlights and being able to truly change white balance and at least magenta/green shifts (unfortunately no blue/amber cast in lightroom for me, only magic lantern allows you to correct that in camera :D) 

Maybe for you all the answer to this question are obvious, but I though it would be nice to have a little corner of the net with a clear cut answer to which camera does generate TRUE raw files (I am looking at YOU: RED, SONY, CANON, BLACKMAGIC )

Because, I would be pretty pissed off if i'd bought a sony f55 or a RED Raven or a Blackmagic Ursa or any other 10k+ camera and find out I can't truly change white balance in post e.g.: The lumetri panel in premiere does not do that. It only apply a azure/orange filter to the image to simulate white balance shift.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/30/2016 at 1:51 AM, Laquaglia Punto Ernesto said:

A) .ari files and Magic Lantern 14bit .dng files

Just FYI, I read that ML raw files are actually recorder in 14bits but encapsulated in a 16bit dng file when processed, but that doesn't change them of course :)

On 11/30/2016 at 1:51 AM, Laquaglia Punto Ernesto said:

The lumetri panel in premiere does not do that. It only apply a azure/orange filter to the image to simulate white balance shift.

The lumetri panel is not a good example, it is far from the best tool to process raw footage. Process your RAW footage (compressed or uncompressed) in ACR (via After Effects) and you'll be able to change WB accurately.

On 11/30/2016 at 1:51 AM, Laquaglia Punto Ernesto said:

 And the answers I have found so fare are:

C) Digital Bolex ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Justin to find interest in this post.
Magic lantern files can come in 16bit or 14bit depending how you convert them raw2cdng, mlvrawviewer and other encapsulate them in 16 bit. for example Magic Lanter RAW video converter 1.9.1 in 14bit :)

I personally use Lightroom for all my .dngs or Adobe Camera Raw. Usually I create a look in lightroom and export it in .xmp via photoshop so that I can apply it easily to all the clips once I convert them in after effects (even though I think I will migrate to resolve and simply work with .dngs that way :D )

C) Digital Bolex if I am not mistaken are 12bit dng with baked in white balance. Same as odyssey 7q+, blackmagic etc. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Grégory LEROY
      I've noticed a change in color temperature when I tweak the contrast setting on my Nikon D5500.
      I set the WB manually, same WB setting for both camera and here is the result:
      Standard Nikon color profile, Contrast 0, sharpness 0:

      Nikon standard profile Contrast  -4, sharpness -4, contrast and sharpness edited in premiere afterward, but I didn't tweak the color temperature at all:
      How do you explain that the 2nd picture is more yellowish? Does tweaking the contrast level in camera impact the WB?
      I prefer the 1st picture look (Nikon standard profile), as a result I don't touch my image setting anymore.
    • By hmcindie
      Hey guys, just finished this one we shot in 2014 (yeah, that's a long way back). This was my second time using 5dmarkIII and RAW except this time we shot way more material. It's not very good but we got it finished so I guess that counts for something ay? Sorry about the accents, we are from Finland so our english ain't the most natural. Learned a shit ton while doing this.
      If you have any questions about 5dmarkIII raw, just shoot away. Everything is upscaled to 4k here.
    • By Neil Creek
      Hi! I'm new to the forum, and a recent purchaser of the EOSHD 5D3 RAW video ebook which has been great thank you very much!
      I learned about Cineform from the book, and at first glance it seems like a huge boon: smaller file sizes, fewer post production steps etc. But today after converting my first full 5D3 RAW video shoot with Cineform, I noticed it didn't seem to be as sharp as I expected. 
      Let me briefly explain my old and new workflow and perhaps someone can tell me if I'm doing anything wrong:
      Old workflow:
      - Copy ML RAW video files to HDD
      - Point Rawanizer to the folder and batch convert all clips into a DNG sequence using the dcraw option
      - Import the DNG sequence into Adobe After Effects, using Adobe Camera Raw to apply some general grading, colour correction, sharpness etc
      - Drop the import into a composition and scale the composition to suit the length of the clip
      - Export to a DNxHD "DNX 120 1080p 25" encoded .mxf file
      - Import all .mxf files into Premiere for editing
      New workflow:
      - Copy ML RAW video files to HDD
      - Point Rawanizer to the folder and batch convert all clips into .avi files with the Cineform option (-422 parameter for the free version)
      - Import all .avi files into Premiere for editing
      - Apply grading and sharpening in Premiere
      As you can see, the new workflow has fewer steps, and I end up with much smaller files, which is great. But even before I apply sharpening to the DNGs in the old workflow, those images are FAR sharper than the ungraded Cineform files. It almost looks like the files are 720p not 1080p.
      I've attached a photo illustrating the dramatic difference. The Cineform is on the left, and the DNG is on the right. The DNG has had no processing done to it, this is how it looks with all ACR sliders set to their defaults.
      Can anyone help? Thank you!

    • By levisdavis
      Digital Bolex is now holding pre-sales on their website. www.DigitalBolex.com.
      It's a big moment in camera history! Congratulations D16 backers as well as the production team behind the D16.
      Digital Bolex is fulfilling pre-sale orders within 8 - 12 weeks. One surprising factoid is that the camera has an internal hard drive option. It's the buyer's option to purchase a 250GB or 500GB internal SSD. Additionally, they are offering a number of different products including accessories and apparel.
      As stated in the D16 advertising, the camera costs about the same as a Canon 5D III. However, if you are a hot-rod camera enthusiast like myself, you're going to find a great deal more camera accessories for the D16 than the 5D III. For example, the BMPCC Metabones Speedbooster. Don't let the name fool you. This lens option will push the D16's low-light ability beyond the BMPCC's big brother the BMPC. Just a reminder here, the BMPC and the D16 are the only two budget-minded professional Cinema DNG cameras with a single-plane sensor offering global shutter.
      On somewhat of a side note, why is the camera called the Digial Bolex D16 and not the Digital Bolex S16? Could it be that by offering shooters the entire 4x3 sensor plane that this camera will be better suited for anamorphic shooters and/or cinema photographers interested in shooting unique aspect ratios? Either way, this sounds like a huge step up from BMPCC software developers. It might even come across as a parallel to 5D III shooters backed by the incredible team behind Magic Lantern.
    • By Ergo Zjeci
      Bit expensive but still looking good
      Built in America for Cinematic Use. The Delkin CF 1050X memory card is a specialized cinema card that's designed to excel in high end recording equipment, such as 4K cameras and digital backs. With capabilities to record data at speeds surpassing 120MB/s, built in UDMA 7 support, and VPG (Video Performance Guarantee) profiling, the CF 1050X card keeps up with the most demanding digital cinematography requirements. 
      Unlike memory cards that are mass-built and shipped in from overseas facilities, the Delkin CF 1050X card is built with carefully chosen and controlled components to increase longevity, reliability and overall quality. Proudly designed, engineered and built in San Diego, CA and supported by our Lifetime Warranty.
  • Create New...