Alt Shoo
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by Alt Shoo
-
-
@mnewxcv it is a very slight denoise, but it really didn’t need it. I just like that look on my images.
-
Even though their sensor manufacturing company is defunct, I’d rather them use a more refined version of their AltaSens sensor. Its image is really beautiful!
-
-
-
13 hours ago, nigelbb said:
If the cost of the XF705 is a bit rich for your blood the new JVC GY-HC500 at half the price (£3395+tax) might be for you. It also has a 1" sensor & can record 4K@50pHDR 4:2:2 10-bit video plus has a 20x power zoom. Interestingly it can record to SSD.
These seem like they are worth it , especially now jvc is doing 10 bit 422 at 4k! Hoping they will bring this option or something better to a new cinema camera or even the Jvc gy-ls300.
-
Both jvc gyls300 footage
More Gyls300 footage
-
Jvc needs to bring out a new more powerful cinema camera or release a substantial upgrade for the LS300
-
Footage looks good to me.
-
The JVC GYLS300 is still very much relevant today! @middster this is really incredible! The JVC Gyls300 is super relevant today! I hope that they continue to update the firmware as well.
-
I would love to use a 4k and above raw recorder with no screen. For monitoring I’ll use the included monitor or purchase a small hd or something similar.
-
On 3/14/2018 at 5:22 AM, BTM_Pix said:
Its interesting how much raging debate there was in threads about these two cameras when they were announced.
Did anyone on here actually ever buy one in the end?
Eva1 owner here! Truly an amazing cinema camera. It’s definitely in the Varicam range of image quality!
-
I forget that in the world of cameras there are pixel peepers and in the world of forums, there are word wizards and sentence surveyors. Whoever feels some type of way about my comment is reading way too much into it.
Matter of fact I agree with the majority, surprisingly that wasn’t read into, that you don’t need 8 bit, but once again for my needs it just doesn’t cut it. Regarding the Xh1 it’s great that it has DCI 4k!
-
No disrespect to those who prefer using 8 bit because I have a few 8 bit tools myself, but as an individual with goals to have any future media I create on broadcast networks, I will adhere to their standards. Now for any personal projects or for vlogging, then I’ll consider something within these specifications.
“Experts” on YouTube can run their tests, which are cool, but the fact remains these aren’t the requirements for any serious and aspiring professional in this industry. Sure there are the few talented souls that are making a living with modest setups and that’s inspiring, but that’s not the normal thing.
These are my opinions based on the facts of the matter. If this offends you, that is your own creation because my intent was not to disrespect or belittle anyone. I came to express a thought that is based on facts about 8 bits vs 10 bits. Regarding the Fuji XH1 it’ll be an awesome tool for stills, however regardless of their advances for video, this camera just won’t cut it ‘for me’.
-
The same reason why creators and broadcasters prefer 10 bit is the reason why I won’t purchase this and yes I’m genuinely interested with this camera. This “shit posting” is an opinion of mine that I’m expressing. The camera is impressive but that’s my perspective of things.
-
-
It’s important to me because as much as I want to, I’m not purchasing the new Fuji xh1 just because it’s 8 but.
-
On 2/25/2018 at 3:28 PM, Anaconda_ said:
@Alt Shoo - Did you shoot that in Jlog 4K to the Atomos? Would you mind sharing some info about lenses / camera settings etc. ?
Hey I didn’t shoot that, but it’s a good recent video. @Kisaha they didn’t market it as a cinema camera, but the cinema part came from them stating this fact through trade shows and industry events.
-
it has been holding up well with a pretty strong user base and I am hoping that jvc has another firmware update or even another cinema camera coming.
-
A JVC Gyls300.
-
Footage looks great to me!
-
3 hours ago, Kisaha said:
Don't all act like the solution isn't already viable. JVC has a perfectly good little camcorder which is NOT a cine camera (even though it is great for shorts and in the fringe of higher spec-ed cameras) and it is NOT advertised by JVC as such, but it costs 2650$ in US, and it is 3000euros in my country, where everything is 20% more expensive than usual EU prices. What they did? Variable sensor, native m43 mount and S35 and even smaller formats. If JVC can do it for 3000euros, I do not see why Panasonic can't for 7500-8000 and still have better specs. The JVC does 4K/60p with an Atomos too. It is not science fiction, it is happening, NOW! https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1333370-REG/jvc_jvc_atmni4k60pcb_gy_ls300_4kcam_ninja.html 3440$ !!! I wouldn't never buy a m43 "cine" camera, but I would definitely buy a variable sensor one, and a GH5 and some G85 as B and C, and photography and every day cameras, and I would have a huge advantage, because right now there isn't any mirrorless Canon cameras for the C100mkII or C200 worthy buying. A lot of friends and colleagues are asking me "what Canon as a B camera?", and I can't light heartedly propose them any. So they go with FS5s and A7sIIs and a6xxx cameras, but they are not very happy with those! C series have nailed AF and ergonomics, they are huge selling points for me.
I disagree with you with the JVC Gyls300 not being a "Cine"camera. It has all the specs of one, the image quality is comparable to what's out there. Here's a couple of examples. Not the best footage for either the Varicam or the LS300, but as you can see with the lighting used here, the IQ is eerily similar. The only thing lacking on the JVC is the 8 bit codec.
3 hours ago, Kisaha said:
3 hours ago, Kisaha said: -
9 minutes ago, dbp said:
Yup, that's the major "if" at this point. I've learned not to trust paper specs. The proof is in the image.
11 minutes ago, deezid said:I'll take two of these if it has the real Varicam (LT) look. That would be amazing.
If footage looks like shot with a GH5 (processed, homevideo like) I buy the C200 instead.Yes I believe it will be high end because Panasonic kept referring to the Varicam for footage when they spoke about features the EVA will have once they fine tune it.
-
1 hour ago, mercer said:
If they were to do that I think it would be in a DSLR/Hybrid format. This won't eat into their Pro Camcorder sales, but a $4000 version would.
I predict that JVC will add internal Raw to the LS300 and it will look and work amazingly, and no one will care.
I was just thinking that about the Ls300, with raw 2k! That ish would be awesome!!! Yet most wouldn't care, what a shame. The JvCgyls300 is an awesome cinema camera able to produce great footage. Anyways the EVA looks like the clear winner to me when it comes to the C200. The sensor is based off of the Varicam, plus its 5.7k resolution???!!! Do you realize what can be achieved with this? Have you seen recent Varicam LT footage??? It looks remarkable! The Netflix series Master of None, Frontier, Love and a couple more shows are shot with a Varicam. I'll be getting this and have my JVC doing B roll.
1 hour ago, mercer said:If they were to do that I think it would be in a DSLR/Hybrid format. This won't eat into their Pro Camcorder sales, but a $4000 version would.
I predict that JVC will add internal Raw to the LS300 and it will look and work amazingly, and no one will care.
I was just thinking that about the Ls300, with raw 2k! That ish would be awesome!!! Yet most wouldn't care, what a shame. The JvCgyls300 is an awesome cinema camera able to produce great footage. Anyways the EVA looks like the clear winner to me when it comes to the C200. The sensor is based off of the Varicam, plus its 5.7k resolution???!!! Do you realize what can be achieved with this? Have you seen recent Varicam LT footage??? It looks remarkable! The Netflix series Master of None, Frontier, Love and a couple more shows are shot with a Varicam. I'll be getting this and have my JVC doing B roll.
-
@Fritz Pierre I agree. I was going to purchase but I felt like there would be an issue with communication because they didn't have any reliable state side support. The image looks pretty though. Did you look into the Cion?
The absolutely mega Olympus E-M10 III - Oversampled 4.6K no crop 5 axis IBIS for $500!
In: Cameras
Posted
@Mattias Burling I don’t see the “beauty”, but I guess I can understand what you are alluding to. Yes, if I wanted to it can most definitely be turned down!