Jump to content

buggz

Members
  • Posts

    514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by buggz

  1. I have the Fringer Pro, the first version, there is a II version now available?

    Hard to keep up, I have too many different bodies/mounts...

    Anywho, the Fringer Pro works well with my Fuji X-T2, and all the AF lenses I have tried with it,
    Canon 50/1.0L, and my Canon 200/1.8L, even my Conurus modified EOS mount Contax N 85/1.4

  2. Is it a plugin for a DAW?

    If so, you can adjust it's strength.

    UPDATE:

    It's a plugin, just bought it, it's adjustable in a DAW, dunno about Resolve.

    I tried plugins in Resolve a while back, didn't work good.

    I use Reaper for audio work, then import finished files into Resolve.

  3. 1 hour ago, Laurier said:

    uch money, you can get a a7rii for 1200 new nowadays, beside the Raw codec ( that is nice on paper, but probably going to be unusable in production ), a a7rii will do everything else better. 

    hat camera should be priced between 1200-1500$ to be competitive.

    Sigma should have made a native EF version of that camera ( they should have gone for EF as well for the Sigma sd Quattro ), because you need to spend and extra 250 to use common glass on it.

    I don t see anyone jumping on the L-mount system just because of that camera.

    Or L mount lenses...

  4. 10 hours ago, thebrothersthre3 said:

    Whats your experience with the Fringer adapter? Tempted to buy one with an 18-35 sigma. 

    I use the Fringer Pro on my X-T2 with great success.

    Canon 100-400L II, 24-105L F4, 200/1.8, and 50/1.0 all work fine.

    I haven't used any APC lenses with it, as I use those with my GH5.

    GH5 with Metabones 0.64XL and Tokina 11-16 and Sigma Art 18-35 both work great, as do all the others above.

  5. 12 minutes ago, User said:

    Is the school and church using a mic that is running through an audio board?

    The reason why I'm asking is that, if they are, you could probably plug into the audio board and get better sound.

    Thanks, I've always asked and have been politely declined.

    Yes, I know that is the best route, besides trying to put mics and recorders on stage, etc.

    Neither venue has ever consented to either way.

    This Tuesday night I try again...

    I'm really asking here because you guys are very knowledgable and experienced.

    I have learned a LOT from this blog, THANKS TO ALL!

    I read this thread with great interest and notice that a shotgun mic like I have is probably not that good to use in an auditorium and church group type environment?

    Because of reflections causing reverb?

    Maybe that's why the auditorium recordings sound muddy?

    I know I have to do LOTS of post work on either.  iZotope plugins help me a lot...

  6. Hope I don't divert too much from the topic,

    What is a good microphone for recording school chorus in an auditorium?  Or small church audience environment?

    I'm always in the back.

    Amateur currently using GH5 and Azden SGM-250 with Audio Technica 3 way selectable pad XLR <> 3.5mm adapter into audio in port.

    Always wanted the Panasonic external audio adapter...

  7. On 8/8/2019 at 1:20 PM, Ed_David said:

    This is the slow death of mirrorless cameras, just as the smartphone killed a huge share of the point and shoot camera market.

    Once this gets improved, for non professionals it will be good enough and definitely for stills shooting. 

    This absolutely kills me.

    No one is willing to calm down and setup shots properly, etc.

    "oh, it'll be good enough."

    I really hate this line of misthinking.

    I tell people who say that, "okay for you, NEVER for me, you will NEVER be no more than good enough, or even less than."

    All my family says this when I bring out my gear and want to perform a proper shoot.

×
×
  • Create New...