Jump to content

ricardo_sousa11

Members
  • Posts

    491
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ricardo_sousa11

  1. Is it fair to say the the 1DC is still the best 4K DSLR/Hybrid on the market?

    It is the best DSLR but the best 4k video camera so far is the NX1 IMO, with the a7sII coming close 2nd.

  2.  

    Shot in 4K with the D5

    Maybe im biased because of the NX1, but this doesnt look good at all.

    The D500 seems outdated, and something that should cost 1000$ less, idk why they thought it would be ok to have 2.1x crop. The D5, as incredible as it will certainly be for stills, doesnt look good in video, I dont care for the 3 min limit, since I usually record short clips, but the image is simply not there, and judging from some clips and even the thumbnail, the DR looks quite terrible. The image lacks detail, looks muddy, and if anyone told me "This clip is from the D800" Id still think its a bad clip, since i've seen the D800 do much better.

  3. nice ! Did you use LUTS on top of your gamma dr footage or is this just custom curves ?

    they need to give us the option to disable nr and sharpening in a firmware update. I have a feeling they won't because it will reveal the grain of their sensor and go against the clean & sharp aesthetic the camera is known for

    Exacly the same settings and lut as I posted earlier.

  4. Hi everyone,

    As most of you know by now, Im an avid user of the NX1, specifically for video, however, I photograph on a daily basis as a hobby. For the most part im extremelly happy with the NX1 as a stills camera, however, coming from an OVF, im still getting used to the EVF. This might be a "silly" question, but, my EVF does not show exacly how my still will end up looking, I mean, if I change settings (aperture/shutter speed), it does not give me a real preview of what im getting, instead gives me what the camera thinks I should see.

    Is there a way to change this ? Are all EVFs like this, and this is common practice ? wouldnt it be better if it gave real preview of what im capturing ?

  5. I brought the Canon FD L's out to play. Left Gamma DR at default contrast and saturation with -10 sharpness and wow. Realizing some of these profiles were meant to stay at their default settings...well at least for my grading workflow. I rather reduce saturation than to add on this camera. Even with standard at default settings (-10 sharpness) viewing the camera histogram showed that it wasn't even clipping any color channels but things look vivid as hell ! All the color and highlight info was there just had to be pulled down in post ! Anyway I am getting less banding and stuff out the gamma dr profile even without neat video.

    The softness of the image is coming from the super 16mm grain with FILMCONVERT btw. Helps reduce that super sharp image from the nx1 that makes fine detail and look almost aliased. Love the softness reminds me of a diffused look. Really made my wide angles sing

    nx1 16mm v2.jpg

    nx1 16mm.jpg

    nx1 super 16mm v3.jpg

    nx1 super 16mm v4.jpg

    These look stunning !

    Gotta try some new settings !

  6. Interesting to see a similar look on the recent Philip Bloom video promoting the FS5:
    http://www.sony.co.uk/pro/article/broadcast-products-pxw-fs5-philip-bloom-review-no-limits

    Both cameras look lovely if you ask me.
    It really comes down to the skills of the operator/editor.
    Props to both Ricardo and Philip and their craftsmanship!

     

     

    That is a huge compliment, im a big fan of Blooms work and how he grades his footage.

    My look is slightly more punchy, in the end of the day its a wedding and needs some sort of "happy" or "joyfull" appeal. But I can see similarities, indeed, which is a great thing, he has always been a professional I look up on. I think the quality we get from consumer cameras nowadays (not only the nx1 but others), is astounishing, and you dont really need to spend much money to make your footage look professional, or refined.

    These are happy days for film making !

     

  7. man, such a huge different from post! I'd like to be such a good colorist as you seem to be!

     

    p.s.: yours is, for sure, a pro quality video coming out from NX1.

    Thank you so much, it really means a lot =) 

    I havent been doing color grading for too long, and the NX1 is my first "pro/enthusiast" camera, I used the Canon 600D for about 1,5 years. I think with the NX1, its a matter of time, you need to get around its quirks, get to know its flaws, and most people just didnt bother to explore it enough.

    A few pages back (I think it was this topic) we were talking about limiting yourself with gear (lenses), and I think that is the best way to evolve and progress, and the same goes for cameras, I cant afford to buy more than one camera, so when I spend 1500€ on a camera, I need to learn how to come out with the best product I possibly can, because I cant get enough money to buy another camera.

  8. Wow such great response :d I too was impressed, this is my fav grading so far, its quite filmic, with enough punch, it looks quite good when playing !

    I used Gamma DR with the settings above. I do underexpose, not by a lot, but just enough to save all the highlights without having any clipping. I dont look at the metering, I just set my exposure by eye, so I dont know if I do by 1 stop or 2 stops, just make sure you're not clipping those highlights.

  9. Heres my settings for the camera on these shots :

    Saturation -2 // Sharpness - 10 // Contrast - 3 // Master black level 8 // 16-235 // For these frames I used the Canon 50mm f1.8 and Samyang 24mm f1.4.

    As for the grading, I used no input lut, just the Sunderland (deluts) Lut at 100% // Fade 44 and Sharpen at 18,5 (though I will decrease this) !

    As for the curves go, heres an image of how it looks, notice I also lowered a bit of saturation on the yellows and reds :

    4ZKbgtq.jpg

    Heres a few more shots with this grading :

    TS0DBNY.jpg

    FgNpWTg.png

    H3SOscN.jpg

    UcPpXxU.jpg

    FNPdod6.jpg

    e0M8OXs.png

    qqqLVcX.png

    4Jl2kRt.jpg

    Some of these will require noise reduction, some are shot at 1080p others at 4k, and I will probably tweak further.

    I find this grading very versatile, it fits mosty of my shots with little to no tweaking, outside, inside, church with those terrible lights and all that.

    Hope you guys like it :d

  10. The reason for the filter inserts is because the best place for them is in the optical center, the apodization filter is a nice idea. But make the lens 300$.

    Even for 300$ I'd find it expensive,  it should not cost more than 200$, and even then, i'd have 0 interest in this, I bought the Samsung 30mm f2.0 for 150€ and that has full AF and great sharpness...We can get better optics for much less and the "Mods" are useless pieces of plastic. This is doomed since the design stage which is quite flawed.

  11. Whatever you think of the price, it seemed like a well written sales pitch. Had enough of a corporate feel to convince a reader that these guys could actually produce what they're claiming they will.

    I dont doubt they will, specially when asking 800$ for each lens and having a goal of 600,000$.

    I think they got way way way too greedy, and they should avoid showing vintage lenses or even mentioning it, considering there is better lenses for 10x less the price.

  12. Good one. I like the music and the pacing (you don't often see this kind of change of pace and acceleration), seem great for a short version video. And I love the expression on the bride's face, so full of happiness...that for me lifted the entire video, so glad you were able to capture it.

    Yeah, this couple was lovely, easily my favorite couple so far (havent been doing this for too long), and they seem to be very inlove, which makes everything easier to do!

×
×
  • Create New...