deezid

That's one example. No sharpening nor noise reduction applied (-5 both).
I never saw any GH5 footage without any sharpening applied in camera, lol.
The only answer I got from these Panasonic marketing guys was like: "All the DOPs loved the sharpening"... WTF

Yeah, really loved what I've seen from you and your X-T2. 

And here we go: More disappointing video-looking stuff with Like709 Gamma and/or lot's of sharpening and nr applied in camera... Ugh
The owner of one of these videos has less than 50 subscribers, how did he get the camera?

Yep pretty bad. No always that much. 
I did not add any sharpening 
 

One user says Panasonic G-cameras (G7, G80, GX80 etc) has different 4k 100Mbs codec than GH4. Any opinions?
http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/16153/panasonic-4k-codec-breaks-100mbps-is-not-enough#Item_14

After playing around with the RAW files out of the GH5 (http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...onic-gh5A7.HTM) I definitely want a switch for turning off any processing like noise reduction (at least luma) and sharpening!
The results speak for themself. Video would look amazing until ISO 1600 with incredible detail and very fine grain. Even better than any Blackmagic URSA 4K footage (thanks to way better dynamic range and high ISO capabilities)

The samples were processed using RAW Therapee (AMAZE Debayering, Chroma noise reduction starting from ISO 1600 and bicubic scaling to 4096px (DCI) width) to emulate the internal downsampling.

Link to full samples in full quality (download and watch at 100% using a proper viewer like faststone): DROPBOX
 
ISO400 (low quality on the forum)

Well it looks like I have been very wrong about AF if these videos are to be believed. I am amazed they have been able to boost it that much.
Some real voodoo science going on here! I may Have to get one. 

Something is up with that one... No way the GH4 is that clean at ISO 6400.
Fake test?

Sure looks like some kind of NR added. idynamic and iresolution maxed?
The high iso with neat video looks like neat video has not been applied correctly - it's pulsing in and out. Makes it worse than not having it. 

Wow do they not see that pulsing? Jesus I had to stop watching it.

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

I shot some high contrast scenes to test out what's the maximum dynamic range you can achieve without F-Log.
 

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

Huh?
The X-T2 shows clearly much more detail, where the Olympus looks muddy while oversharpened with lot's of halos. The Fuji wins hands down.

Lovely colors!
Really like what the Fuji XT2 does with it's color science.
Just one question, is it possible to get more information in the highlights? They seem to blow out quite early.

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

Cool, nice find!
Looks amazing on my 4k screen (too much red in their skin, but great otherwise!!).
There's no way that this isn't GH5 material.

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

@John Matthews 
Hey John, I like the Procolor plus Filmconvert version the best. So did you shoot that in standard or natural?
 
Here is an example filmed by deezid I had to post, regarding beautiful Panny skin tones and rich overall colors.
8bit Vlog, lookin great! It also has a 4K version on ytube for inspection. Really finding it to be one of the best Panny color examples.

 

Would like to know what you think about our newest work.
Shot with the infamous Panasonic GH4, internal V-LOG 8bit, -5/-5 NR and sharpness. Used Panasonic lenses: 12-35mm 2.8, 20mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7. Used a Tiffen Black Satin Filter to get rid of the sharpning artifacts still left over at -5 and add some smoothness to highlights and shadows.
Budget: about 0$.
 

I suspect the wide short is a different model/brand camera.  The levels do not match.
 

Filmed using a Nocticron. Are there any 4/3rds cameras already shooting 4k 60p?
That has to be the GH5 and it looks amazing on my 5k iMac. Looks like they have vastly improved skin tones and the shadows are as clean as can be.

Could this be gh5 footage? Griffin Hammond is apparently working with panasonic on the gh5. YouTube says this vid is 4k60p.