Jump to content

Matthias Malleši�

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Matthias Malleši�

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Interests
    Film, video, music and computers.

Recent Profile Visitors

1,288 profile views

Matthias Malleši�'s Achievements


Member (2/5)



  1. Looks like glass chips to me, can happen when the lens is fastened to the metal ring...Have no effect on image if not in the critical place.
  2. Nice work; to my opinion some deskewing could be done at some scenes...
  3. Yes, the price was less than 10e (postage included). Mine comes at 52mm (probably will do for Sun Anamorphic and Schneider Cinelux, will post some results, when done).
  4. I don't think they're the same, probably similar design and different manufacturer. Have only sun 16 out of lens mentioned, so can't tell you exactly...
  5. Your video looks a bit dreamy, which cam was used? Taking lens and anamorphic should be focused, both of them. Anyway, you choose the SEQUENCE settings upon the ratio you want to get in the final product. I prefer 1:2,35; if you'd like to have 1:2,66, you would do for example 2880x1080pix sequence. You want to preserve during editing most of original vertical resolution your camera outputs. Then you stretch the horizontal as much as needed for choosen sequence to look natural (or the circles look natural). I have modified some lens for closer focus. In that case it came out 1,5 to 1.6 ratio for 2x anamorphic lens. Anyway, sides (with 16:9 sensor) would be cropped out, as we have interest only in specified final ratio. Then you render to 1920x816 (2.35), 1920x720 (2,67) or 2560x1080 - as you like...
  6. 1920x820 is not 2,66 ratio. I personally use 1920x816 (or 800), as you like. This is only for rendering. Editing should be done in higher resolution, for example 2560x1080 (sequence) or even more. With stretching only horizontal to cca 190% for 2x anamorphics(or as you like) you crop the sides off, You can move the image left or right in EFFECTS-Motion MENU. Then apply some effects, if you want and render to 2560x1080 or 1920x816, as you like - as this is final product. This works for me, somebody else has probably different approach. Regards
  7. Have you tried uploading 2592x1080? With anamorphic adapter you don't really gain any resolution. Something similar is squezing 1920x1080 ordinary footage to 960x1080 and back, you'll see what happens in terms of resolution. Otherwise 1920x804 is just a way of presenting your footage, I prefer 800 or 816 (dividable by 16)....
  8. Zeiss 63/2x is sure for keep; Kiptar and Sankor, too. Rectimascopes are OK, especially smaller ones (48/2x), about B&L and meopta can't tell.
  9. Excellent results. I'm having two 35-2-3s, one of them waiting to be modified something like yours in spring...thx for info..
  10. My opinion is that the anamorphic shooting is not really suited for handheld shots. At first I was really caught on choosing the right stretch, but now I opt for stretch that looks just right to me (not necesarry the exact one). I think that is also a magic of it, not being always on 100% real measure. I edit mainly in Vegas, there's SONY DISTORT effect plugin, shifting only Y axis - when necesarry...
  11. I was one of the bidders, last 4 seconds just gone wild...
  • Create New...