-
Posts
9,514 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
IronFilm got a reaction from Liam in Sony F5 hack unlocks 4K XAVC recording
Is 10bit.
And got the great news last night I'll be shooting the Feature Film with both a F5 and my F3! :-D
-
IronFilm reacted to Andrew Reid in My wife was almost scammed seling a camera for $1500 on ebay
Glad to hear it.
New blog posts coming soon!
-
IronFilm reacted to Andrew Reid in My wife was almost scammed seling a camera for $1500 on ebay
My goodness, it just gets worse.
Whilst I was Italy I did read some of what went on and thought the community handled it brilliantly and thanks to my mods too like Andy Lee.
Hopefully we can move on from this guy and get back to sanity.
-
IronFilm reacted to bamigoreng in My wife was almost scammed seling a camera for $1500 on ebay
Ebrahim is active on http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?348423-BE-CAREFUL-Sadly-Ebrahim-Saadawi-or-another-people-using-his-account-is-a-scammer/page3
-
IronFilm reacted to sanveer in Xiaomi Yi II $250, 4K, LCD screen, fast fps
If Xiaomi make a decent Log profile for the video (like Protunes), it will sell even more. Though, both of them don't have very sharp lenses, for stills.
-
IronFilm reacted to OliKMIA in My wife was almost scammed seling a camera for $1500 on ebay
Easy to get around this type of scam. Personally I always login into my paypal account and check that the funds are there directly. Then I make the shipment.
I also never use any other means of payment than Paypal. If someone says that "paypal doesn't work" or ask to use Western Unions, the whole transaction goes to the BS bin.
-
IronFilm reacted to Ed_David in My wife was almost scammed seling a camera for $1500 on ebay
My wife was selling a camera on ebay and got a bid , then boom, buy it now.
She got a message from the buyer who said the paypal via ebay couldn't go through, and if she could give her email to him and he would send it thru that.
Paypal emails, says to send the camera, funds are being held until its confirmed that he gets it.
And that was the scam -
here's the email and I'll explain the scam and how it works:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: PayPal <service@paypalapprovalorder.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:27 PM
Subject: PayPal Tracking Number Required***You can now post the item
To: [REDACTED]
PayPal. Safer. Simpler. Smarter.
Use your debit or credit card without revealing your details to retailers.
Speed through checkout without the need to enter your card number or postal address.
Send money to family and friends for free.
Make sure you ship to the buyer's desire address ONLY.
Make sure you’re using the latest Internet browser.
Payment has been received - You can now post the item
Dear ThinPlace|Pictures,
You've received a payment, detailed below. We've placed a temporary hold on the funds for this transaction.
eBay and PayPal are working together to make it safer than ever to buy on eBay. One of the boldest steps is to identify transactions that pose the greatest risk of fraud and holding the payments from sellers for a period of time to help ensure that the transaction go smoothly.
We'll release the payment for the eBay item if either of the following occurs:
The shipment tracking number is received.
We confirmed item was mail by recognized courier with tracking number.(USPS Priority Mail Express 1-Day)
We will notify you by email when the funds are released. Once we confirmed the shipment information.
You are safe and secure to ship the item.
Payment Details
Amount (pending): $1,800.00 USD
Routing Code: C840-L001-Q999-T5350
Buyer's Email: tylerwebb345@outlook.com
Buyer's Required Shipping Details
Address:
Barbara M Umstead
100 Oak Dr
Chicora Pennsylvania
16025.
United States
Yours sincerely,
PayPal
For assistance contact us via email as our customer service team will be happy to assist you.
Copyright © 2016 PayPal. All rights reserved.
PayPal
___________
So this scam is stupid because the money doesn't go into her account. Also I typed the subject line into google, and 4 other people had the same email - via rolexes, etc. The poor scam artist could have at least modified a few words!
The better scam I almost got hit on years ago is on a macbook pro I sold - he sent the paypal, and he gave an address. fedex noticed that address was an abandoned area of town, and the only reason I got the laptop back is that he was at lunch when he was supposed to be there to grab the computer.
So they steal the computer, then they report to paypal they never got the computer and then , they have the computer for free.
___
The above guy was lazy.
Anyway, in the internet age, there aren't burgulars anymore or pickpockets - there are online scammers.
Imagine if someone came to your house and stole $1500 from your place. you would freak out.
how is this different?
I don't want to reference anything that went down on this forum, but this got me thinking because the person who did the fraud said he would refund money but he hasn't and he probably won't because he's involved in many, many camera scams.
He probably has at least 10 going at all times.
He probably also has some hook up in the USA and preys on people like my wife - with his knowledge of cameras too, he can be a pretty convincing buyer.
Anyway, the internet sucks.
People scam people on it a lot.
Because there is no face to face communication. A person doesn't know what it feels like to get robbed of $1500 online because they never see that person.
No one knows how it all feels.
Anyway
I really wish Andrew Reid would jump into this.
i feel like we all have PTSD from the event.
I know I probably encouraged some of it. But I still feel horrible especially now that I know that one of the scam victims still hasn't gotten his money back.
-
-
IronFilm reacted to Cinegain in Canon 1Dc $4,999
Maybe his 1DC didn't get stolen. Maybe he only just now returned it!
-
IronFilm reacted to Snowfun in Canon 1Dc $4,999
Big companies could promote one-off "as used by Ebrahim Saadawi" versions...
-
IronFilm reacted to Marco Tecno in NX 500 as a cinema camera
I still hope that, somehow, hackers will bring 4:2:2 and above all 10bit to internal recording. The nx1 is a powerful computer and imo has the hw possibilities for doing this.
-
IronFilm reacted to andy lee in Lighting question
I have posted this the other day but its relevent here on this thread and some of you may have missed it so here it is again:
I use Fresnels most of the time Arri originals and recently I bought a whole bunch of Chinese Arri copy fresnels off ebay for the feature film I just did , I needed to light 3 sets simultaniously and leave the lighting up for weeks at a time (I had 25 fresnels up at once on 3 sets) ,I like Fresnels as you can use them as a hard light or add some f1 Diffussion and use them as a soft light, you cant do that with Kino Flos they are soft all the time , so for me Fresnels are the way I light most of the time , the exception is lighting Women .. where a soft light is more beautiful , so sometimes if I need a very soft look , I use Kinos then or LED tube lights I have made - basically LED Kinos not tube Kinos ,
The Chinese Fresnels are just as good as the real Arri ones I was amazed , once you have a good globe/bulb in them like Osram - there is nothing in it ,
I bought 150s 300s 650s and 1K Pups and they are all superb , they worked 40 days for 12 hrs a day no issues .
so check these out they are great
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fresnel-Tungsten-Spotlight-150W-Lighting-Studio-camera-Video-/331687239451?hash=item4d3a199f1b:g:x8AAAOSw-zxWoXQS
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Pro-1000W-Movie-Fresnel-Tungsten-SpotLight-Studio-Camera-Video-/252322910892?hash=item3abf9e12ac:g:lP8AAOSwAuNW6hii
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/On-Sales-UK-Fresnel-Tungsten-Spotlight-300W-Lighting-Studio-camera-Video-/252134887278?hash=item3ab4690f6e:g:0k0AAOSwqYBWp0Dk
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Pro-Studio-650W-Tungsten-Spot-light-Dimmer-globe-Compatible-arri-bulb-/231722293457?hash=item35f3b998d1:g:0nUAAOSwKtlWp0A4
they are all amazing prices , I do recomend these lamps .
300w Fresnels in action on the movie Pandora with diffusion and gels on the front - standard stuff for me
-
IronFilm reacted to Cinegain in Sony A6300 review (rolling) - Striking image but nagging issues
Maybe so. Yet... they did jeopardize the A6300's reliability. Even if you're doing some small production, there's going to be a time and patience/willingness constraint. If you're working with people at some point they're going to be sick of your 'ow, wait, there goes the camera again, great performance you guys, but we'll have to reshoot this'. And some moments are exactly that: 'moments', and you might not get a 2nd chance to relive it. That's why you probably can't have your camera fail on you all of a sudden, prompting warnings or just shut down. Add the rolling shutter and Sony colors you'll have to struggle with... even with the solid 4K and respectable lowlight performance, are you really so easy to forgive it? Are you going out of your way, by flipping out the screen, opening the battery compartment and even mounting a fan to make it work for you? Why would you do that to yourself? That borders masochism. Does the end justify the means? For me, I like to be in control. I like to shoot at my chosen focal length, focus distance, f-stop, shutterspeed, ISO and white balance. I certainly don't let the camera decide when to start and when to call it a day. When it's critical to get the shot, you gotta be able to trust your camera to handle it. If it can quit on you at any given time, that's just no bueno. But that's just my two cents. I wanted to love and get the A6300, but ultimately I just couldn't.
-
IronFilm reacted to Cinegain in An adventure into the Panasonic GX85/80 begins - and a look at the Leica Nocticron for Micro Four Thirds
I hope they do an end of summer sale on the micro, then I might get one too.
-
IronFilm reacted to Flynn in An adventure into the Panasonic GX85/80 begins - and a look at the Leica Nocticron for Micro Four Thirds
I actually prefer Panasonic to Sony. I think Panasonic are much better made and well thought out. Which is why I'm pulling for Panasonic and really hope they're able to put something groundbreaking like that organic sensor in the GH5.
-
IronFilm got a reaction from Damphousse in Canon 1Dc $4,999
Every camera (especially with the well under $5K range) has its own little set of niggles. Even the famous and expensive 1D C has ***HEAPS*** of niggles. Even an Arri Alexa has some niggles, that is why they brought out the Amira and then the Alexa Mini.
But with an external battery pack (or a pocket full of batteries... I've got 13! So I can go with either option, just internal or external as well) you can go for ages and ages. I did this a couple of weekends ago inside at a Motorsport Expo, using the BMPCC as a quick and dirty run and gun camera on a monopod shooting to Rec709 ProRes LT (as there would be a lot of footage, none of which I'd be editing).
This shows you can even happily use a BMPCC for one of its most unconventional uses: run and gun!
If I was doing this outdoors I'd have added a monitor (I've got a Feelworld FW759 now, but hopefully I'll get a nice little 5" or smaller one to add to it instead).
The total size and weight would still be smaller than what a naked 1D C would be! And more functional. (1D C monitoring features are shit)
GoPros have been around for many years longer than a BMPCC, for a long time they were the ONLY option. That is why they were used.
GoPros would still be used now for their low cost , their widespread availability, waterproofness, extreme small size, and ease of use.
But for when image quality really matters, productions will always be now reaching for a BMPCC/BMMCC over a GoPro.
In many many cases 4K is not **NEEDED***. 4K is not needed for nearly all of my work. As AaronChicago just mentioned only a few comments before yours, he is really only using his URSA Mini 4.6K as FHD ProRes HQ and not 4K as that is all that is required for his needs.
So yes, would be lovely if the BMPCC had 4K! But it absolutely does not have to be a deal breaker requirement for many of us.
As for 60p.... that is solved, we have the BMMCC if a person must have that.
Needs an external recorder however... if BMD had included that inside the design then it would be a lot bigger and no longer Micro, plus the price would leap up.
This is however something I'd like to see! Could likely be sub $3K? With a URSA Micro (even a bit smaller than URSA Mini! But please please add internal NDs) design with a 1" (or 4/3") sensor doing 4K that gets recorded internal.
NAB 2017? To ship in 2018! Haha
I dunno, they would sell a **SHITLOAD** of Canon Rebel series DSLRs (and 60D/70D DSLRs too, only one step up) to people who never buy anything more than the kit lens it came with. Maaaybe a 50mm f1.8 and/or a walk around superzoom as well.
The people who buy L series glass from Canon are a tiny proportion of that.
But yes, if you excluded Rebel DSLR buyers from these figures, then I could agree with you.
5Dmk4 and 5D C having two very different sensors? Doesn't seem like a Canon thing to do! This seems unlikely to me.
-
-
-
IronFilm got a reaction from PannySVHS in G7 Internal Recording + HDMI out?
Shall do so soon. I think I've mentioned once or twice on this forum what it was shot with but hopefully nobody remembers!
-
IronFilm reacted to LimitBreak in Magix Sony VEGAS Pro 14 to have native Prores support & cost $199 only
Someone should review the new version when it comes out, then compare encoding with OpenCl and Nvidia Cuda on different new graphic cards like the RX480 and the 1070 or 1080.
-
-
IronFilm reacted to chauncy in NX 500 as a cinema camera
H265 from nx1/nx500 can take a pretty substantial color grade. Not as much as raw from my bmcc, but a good deal more than most codecs, I grade straight with h265 in both resolve and premeire, although you can transcode to h264 or whatever before if you choose.
It can be a very cinematic look if you know what you're doing. Never hurts to light a scene in a cinematic way or to use good lens either. But it is a more robust codec than people seem to assume.
-
IronFilm reacted to lucabutera in Samsung NX Speed Booster
Updates NXL NX / EF:
Hi, I worked on this adapter for a few consecutive days, the biggest difficulty was finding the right point of distance between the lens and sensor.
A tenth lower and slamming into the sensor, a tenth farther and slammed into the lens.
Find the right setting to infinity focus it seemed impossible, and some moments I was throwing in the towel with canon EF mount to return to Nikon.
All this for 0.05 of a millimeter (Canon EF mount is definitely the final flange focal distance limit).
Now fortunately, the system works perfectly and soon will publish the first tests with Nx1 camera.
See you soon.
-
IronFilm reacted to Parker in Samsung NX Speed Booster
I disagree, dude. I've got a pretty thriving business that's equal parts stills and video and the NX1 and NX500 do everything I need and more stills-wise. Fantastic dynamic range, high mp for great detail, wonderful adaptability for vintage lenses... Honestly what more do you need? This new speedbooster will only make things better, I can't wait to see how different some of my lenses look wider and a stop faster.
-
IronFilm reacted to lucabutera in Samsung NX Speed Booster
After much work and many sleepless nights, I have almost finished my work and I think I have brought the lens NXL to the point of being sold to the public.
I thought if the test this week will be positive to produce it with Canon EF mount dumb to which you can add a Nikon adapter with iris aperture control.
At this stage it allows to mount all Nikon and Canon lenses, in the future I will continue to work to enable the electronic control of the lenses.