-
Posts
187 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by Ian Edward Weir
-
-
-
On 4/19/2016 at 3:00 PM, MattH said:
The kit lens has mega OIS. Unfortunately the video doesn't specify whether this was turned on or not.
Thanks for pointing that out. I just leaned that the Power O.I.S lens do work a little better then the Mega O.I.S. I look forward to seeing a video showing how it looks with non O.I.S lens.
-
In camera stabilization with a none O.I.S lens looks good! Check out 0:52 to 1:02. He is using the kit lens. It would be even better with O.I.S LENS
-
Here is one on ebay for a starting bid of $900. Nobody even bid on it last time. http://www.ebay.com/itm/FULL-KIT-Bolex-Moller-8-19-1-5x-Anamorphot-Anamorphic-amp-Redstan-Clamp-/322064478026?&_trksid=p2056016.m2516.l5255
-
A very nice Baby Hypergonar anamorphic / Cinemascope lens in great shape! This lens has a 1.75x ratio which is true CinemaScope and when used on a 4:3 sensor, it produces a 2.33:1 Resulting Aspect Ratio. I don't see any scratches, mold or haze in lens. Very macro cleaning scratches, which don't show up in footage or pictures. Lens in in great shape for 60+ years old.
It comes with custom Rapido clamp for connecting lens to taking lens. The clamp connects to a 52mm thread but with different step up rings you can change this.
-
I'm not sure if this was posted before but it is an incredible resource for aspect ratio templates Cheers! http://vashivisuals.com/3k-4k-5k-6k-aspect-ratio-free-templates-premiere-and-after-effects/#comment-42309
-
On 3/6/2016 at 6:51 PM, Phillip23 said:
Can someone tell me what the advantage would be of the full Rectilux 3FF over this core DNA?
One advantage on the Rangefinder would be focus marks, but I'd choose non rotation of glass to be more important.
I can tell you the pros and cons between the Core DNA and SRL Magic Rangefinder. I don't own the 3FF
The Rangefinder and Rectilux each have there strengths.
Rangefinder :
Pros - Is built better then Rectilux. Feels more solid and does not make any noise when rotating. Rotating gear is much smoother.
You could get it with distance marks. 82mm is easily to mange then 86mm via diopters. 77mm is very nice when connecting to anamorphic verses 75mm but I was lucky it fit my Redstan Baby Hypergonar jacket perfect! Half the price of Core DNA.
Rectilux Core DNA :
Image quality is better, sharper and does not tint the image on the warm side. The Core DNA is tac sharp at 1.2 and the Rangefinder needs 2.8 or higher. I'm not a big fan of Rangefinder blue flare blobs. The Core has a non rotating front, which is important to me for a circular polarizer and ND filters being I love shooting nature. For me it was well worth the extra cash.
A short video I shot with it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zS1pw5p7yc&list=PLIEXyH1Xyq4ToDcZ0ZVCl6bVk060hc_O-&index=3
Here is a list of extras I have compiled to take the Core DNA to the next level.
I would highly recommend getting these extras to make the Core DNA ready for use.
1. M3/M4 Stainless Steel Nylon Head Grub Screw Plastic Brake Buffer Bolt Screws Hex
This is so you don’t scratch up the coating of your anamorphic lens or housing.
2. 86mm UV filter to protect the front of the Core DNA glass.
3. Metal back cap for whatever size you end up using for your coupler if bigger then 75mm.
4. A custom coupler made from this lens hood fits perfectly. “FOTGA Screw Mount 67mm Standard Metal Lens Hood for Canon Nikon Pentax Sony Olympus”
http://www.amazon.com/FOTGA-Screw-Standard-Pentax-Olympus/dp/B009GFY858
Then a step down ring or step up ring for whatever the size of your front anamorphic thread is. I’m doing 77mm because this is what most of my front clamps are. I’m making a custom 75mm to 77mm coupler for Kowa 1.5x and Kowa 1.75x.
5. 86mm Fixed Spacer Ring
http://srb-photographic.co.uk/86mm-fixed-spacer-ring-5713-p.asp
You want a uv filter to protect the glass but having it on you can’t completely go to infinity. Lucky, even with the uv filter on and not being able to turn the Core DNA to infinity, I’m sharp for over 100 feet. This spacer is for clearing the full range of the focus and using filters.
6. You want to get some 86mm or higher diopters. You need them if you want to get sharp and close.
- sketch2099 and Jim Chang
- 2
-
11 hours ago, jase said:
Looks great! How close can you get without the diopter?
You can get to 0.7 meters or 2 feet 3 inches. I use a 86mm +0.6 and a +0.26 in front for close ups.
-
32 minutes ago, tigerbengal said:
Congrats Ian!! great video, Love the first 19 sec and last part...Anamorphic background!! cool.
also thank you for sharing your setup and what worked for you with the Rectilux...
Thanks! I love sharing and learning from all of you.
-
4 hours ago, Patrick B. Rau said:
Thank you for sharing your footage with us. You're right about the shots at the end of the video. They're beautiful.
Thank you Patrick!
-
Rectilux Core DNA: Extras to get by Ian Edward Weir
I would highly recommend getting these extras to make the Core DNA ready for use.
1. M3/M4 Stainless Steel Nylon Head Grub Screw Plastic Brake Buffer Bolt Screws Hex
This is so you don’t scratch up the coating of your anamorphic lens or housing.
2. 86mm UV filter to protect the front of the Core DNA glass.
3. Metal back cap for whatever size you end up using for your coupler if bigger then 75mm.
4. A custom coupler made from this lens hood fits perfectly. “FOTGA Screw Mount 67mm Standard Metal Lens Hood for Canon Nikon Pentax Sony Olympus”
http://www.amazon.com/FOTGA-Screw-Standard-Pentax-Olympus/dp/B009GFY858
Then a step down ring or step up ring for whatever the size of your front anamorphic thread is. I’m doing 77mm because this is what most of my front clamps are. I’m making a custom 75mm to 77mm coupler for Kowa 1.5x and Kowa 1.75x.
5. 86mm Fixed Spacer Ring
http://srb-photographic.co.uk/86mm-fixed-spacer-ring-5713-p.asp
You want a uv filter to protect the glass but having it on you can’t completely go to infinity. Lucky, even with the uv filter on and not being able to turn the Core DNA to infinity, I’m sharp for over 100 feet. This spacer is for clearing the full range of the focus and using filters.
6. You want to get some 86mm or higher diopters. You need them if you want to get sharp and close.
-
Here is my first test with my run and gun anamorphic set up.
Shot on a GH4 in 4k with natural profile.
Lens used were Baby Hypergonar anamorphic + LINOS MeVis-C 35mm F1.6 Most of it shot at f1.6 or f2.8
Rectilux Core DNA with +0.6 diopter on close ups.
No sharping or noise reduction.. I hope you like. The images at the end I really love. The Rectilux is a dream but you diopters to get sharp below 2 feet.- Dick Sweeney, SigurdW, Rudolf and 4 others
- 7
-
I have a hacked GH2, then I got the GH3 "Lol" and I currently use the GH4. I must say that I'm thinking of jumping ship to Sony. Who wants noisy 6k footage with f4 at Ido 800. I will take an Sony A6300 and have 4K f4 at Iso at 3200 or double that with little to no noise. Thoughts?
-
You said 77mm. The Tokina 72mm is amazing and worth the money for a great low power diopter. I own a +0.25, +0.4, +1, +2.6, +3 and +10. They all have different purposes. You should do yourself a favoir and save money by getting a Rectilux Core DNA variable diopter or SRL Magic Rangefinder. Then you would only need +2 or higher for closeups or macro. The more you put in front of a 2x anamorphic, the longer your taking lens will need to be to avoid vignetting.
-
Marumi 77mm 77 DHG Macro +3 330 Achromat Achromatic Close up Lens. Super sharp and very nice quality. If you want to have a nice close up. I use it with Baby Hypergonar in picture below.
http://www.amazon.com/Marumi-Macro-Achromat-Achromatic-Filter/dp/B003VHN1SC
-
Here is my first test with my Kowa PA - 35 Inflight 1.75x anamorphic lens. I used three different taking lens. 1. Olympus Zuiko 38mm f1.8 2. Zeiss Ultron 50mm f1.8 and the Voigtlander 42.5mm f0.95. I love this lens. I love the single coating and the way it flares and how it transforms the character of the taking lens so well. I hope you enjoy this vintage anamorphic lens porn my friends. Watch in 4k. cheers! Ian
-
I'm in love with the look of the Kowa 35 1.75x Inflight shot in 4k 3840x2160 in 16:9 mode on GH4.
Here is my first test with a pretty lady I know walking around three different taking lens. 1. Olympus Zuiko 38mm f1.8 2. Zeiss Ultron 50mm f1.8 and the Voigtlander 42.5mm f0.95. I love this lens. I love the single coating and the way it flares and how it transforms the character of the taking lens so well. I hope you enjoy this vintage anamorphic lens porn my friends. Watch in 4k. cheers! Ian
-
He used some Cine housed Zeiss Otus Primes, which is what really makes the images special. Lovely work on this!
-
5 hours ago, Tito Ferradans said:
Time to address the second most common question asked when it comes to anamorphics: "How wide can I go with this anamorphic?".
Your problems are over! Here I introduce my hFOV calculator!Test it, break it, enjoy. Let me know.
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=8615
You can input all your settings (camera/crop factor, taking lens, focal reducers, anamorphic stretch and sensor aspect ratio) to check if you'll get vignetting, the equivalent focal length of your horizontal field of view and your final aspect ratio. You can also discover which taking lenses will give you a specific horizontal field of view and what crop should you set on your camera to achieve a specific final aspect ratio.
Thanks for doing this Tito! This is next level! Cheers!
-
A beautiful spot shot in anamorphic. Looks like a Kowa?. Anamorphic zoom? Anybody on EOSHD shoot this? Great job!
- ken and valery akos
- 2
-
I just finished my new anamorphic wildlife video. I filmed for three days over the last few months on St. Vincent Island Wildlife Refuge. A very unique and beautiful place. So before you and I get lost in Starwars, The Revenant and The Hateful Eight, please sit back relax and take a journey through this wild island with me.
Technical:
Filmed on a Panasonic GH4 in 4k
Bolex 16/32 1.5x anamorphic lens with Voigtländer 25mm F0.95, Voigtländer 42.5mm F0.95 and Takumar SMC 135mm F2.5 V2 as taking lens. I shot in anamorphic 4:3 mode on GH4. -
A couple of things are preventing me to go with the Redstan clamp, first is sadly Price, i live in Mexico and the pounds to pesos convertion is making it expensive (100 dollars to pesos is 1650.00, 100 pounds to pesos is 2600.00). Second is the time it will take from UK to California (i live at walking distance to San Diego, Ca) and third, judging from the pictures at Redstan, it looks like the adapter doesn't go flat with the end of the kowa at the taking lens connection, it seems to be a few mm recessed so it will vignette a bit more when on a wider lens. Any users of a kowa 16s and a redstan clamp that can assure me that it is really worth it??
There are other alternatives but Redstan's clamps will get you closest to you taking lens. They are also the easiest to use, the safest being your anamorphic lens will not fall to the ground when your adjusting your alignment, and the sexiest in my option. You get what you pay for. Redstan is the man and his clamps are amazing but if you are in a crunch for time and money, Jim at Rapidotechnolgy could have a alternative. http://www.rapidotechnology.com/
- Jim Chang and elgabogomez
- 2
-
Thanks for this, it looked really great. I think this is some of my favourite GH4 footage & it certainly has a lot to do with the Baby Hypergoner.
I especially loved the seagull shots!
Thanks Bioskop.Inc! Interesting thing with that seagull flying shot was I shot it in 96fps and the rest of the video in 4k. I scaled the seagull shot up to 4k and it still looked great. The Baby is amazing! Thanks for checking it out and feedback. Cheers!
-
Hi all,
Inspired by Tito and Bold and their anamorphic Lens-cyclopedia, I decided to try and make a list of low power diopters useful for anamorphic video. Using the info in this thread and searching on the web, I compiled a list which may be useful for anyone looking for suitable diopters.
I've attached the list as PDF. Feel free to comment and/or correct. The list may (hopefully) end up as an add-on to the online Lens-cyclopedia.
Great list! You might want to add the Marumi DHG Achromat Macro Lens 330 (+3) and (+5) Very good quality. Come in 72mm and are achromat doublets. Also a Polaroid 250D Close Up Lens (72mm) which is a +2 achromat doublet. Redstan made a +0.25 achromatic doublet but you might not want to add it to your list being he made 8. I have one and it's incredible. I hope he makes more because when you put it in front of the SRL Magic rangefinder it does wonders
One Lens?
In: Cameras
Posted
I have the version one. I also have the 17.5mm and the 42.5mm. The 42.5mm can be clickless, which is nice. They are all worth the money. I see the 25mm go cheaper on ebay then the others.