Emanuel

AFAIK it will also depend on the shooter and settings, obviously : -) Not a bible but:

https://www.thephoblographer.com/2018/09/25/adapter-review-fringer-ef-fx-pro-tested-on-the-fujifilm-x-pro-2/

@Andrew Reid I know it is unnecessary to refer it or even add a request here, that's unlikely the million dollars doubt, only the question to know the answer for now, though. What's the best deal between those two current best options tested from the field by the hands and eyes of some shooter like you? I think that's everything many of us are eagering to know.

Last but not least James Miller's stuff graded:

Yeah, but only for the 1st part of your entry : ) I don't think nor hope/want the prediction of your 2nd line may end pretty much accurate anyway... : )) BTW that "PRO" high-end pilgrim route is simply blocking a better service from BMD on introducing into a full media convergence age we all live, more advanced and updated hybrid features such as AF, IBIS only to name a few for their middle-to-lower product range FYI : -) Who wants to walk back?

I must confess that large(r) screen in-camera makes that device unique of a kind as far as both ergonomics and usability concern too (aside IQ and the usual codecs mantra, obviously). People apparently don't care, but... photo source: MY

Both @Mattias Burling and @noone approaches are pretty on spot... ; -)

Is there anyone who can test tap-to-focus along the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 with Viltrox or even Metabones SB adapters?

Yes, you're right : ) They will need to adapt themselves. "PRO" world as we were used to is gone. Thing of the past. Only high-end still resists. Because of the brand value. While Hollywood chooses ARRI, they can sleep well by night. This is 2018, not first half of the current decade we live : -)

Yes indeed @Andrew Reid that's funny, because it is quite the opposite. Take a shot on this one here as for instance: "This company should go bankrupt." "This company is a joke." Does this make any sense? I don't even mention wolf33d's comment. I fully disagree with him on that one but he is entitled to have his opinion. You instead @Inazuma you mention that as a fact. It is not : ) I am not Canon's client more than I am Panasonic's or Blackmagic's for example. I just don't appreciate unfounded attacks though. One of the reasons I've always supported Andrew even before he had made his fame along his blog and forums, from that dvxuser period yet, comes from the fairness of his criticism. He has never flattered Canon or any other brand without a fair basis behind. He is much more critical than supportive BTW. No idea how long you are his reader and if you are a good reader of his articles. But I am proud to be one of his most frequent followers, so I guess I am entitled to let you know that's not accurate : -)

From your own pocket, right? Those guys have no proper business sense. Nonprofessional from their side to say the least IMO (E : -)

Andrew? Are you sure you're a reader of him? Humm... Andrew is an enthusiastic camera observer. The best quality of his work as reviewer IMO is to be as much brand agnostic as me ; ) Reason why I am here BTW : -)

Man, I knew I appreciate your insights. But you took exactly my thoughts this time when I watched it, even before this thread to have popped up. So I guess we cannot go wrong, both of us, in any way whatsoever... ; -)

Great article, Andrew : ) here's my hat from someone twice graduated in law and film (E : -)

Canon is a great brand, not only addressed to camera releases, c'mon... I never regretted to buy Canon so far but I make my choices based on their best offer, as happens with everything, other manufacturers included, obviously.

Yeah, I will update you in a week or so... Hold your horses, guys! : -)

In fact, these torture tests don't reflect a realistic use. Seems a great tool. I hope to have it between the end of week and the beginning of next one. Let's wait and see.

I'd bet on the upcoming Leica 10-25mm f/1.7, definitely a no-brainer if not too far from the $1K mark.

Absolutely. I find this test sample much more interesting though, apart the subject : -)

Small sensors under 1-inch are too limited for anything other than wide shots going along deep DOF and flat 2D looking. Period. E : -)

I will have one on my hands along this week, I hope. There are also other threads open on topic:

@Topcat Best test ever seen to triple match slowmo, a gimbal shot and nice bokeh from that kit lens. For your 1st video ever and if she is your fiancée, double compliments fellow : ) My top hat : -)