Emanuel

LOL Quote of the day : -)

You're funny @noone you just second my comment. Anyway. People tend to see criticism necessarily in a negative way. There is good and bad. Like work, you need good criticism to improve your results or it will (in)variably end a shitty one (just sayin' just my 0.2 : -)

Still loving Canon outcome, no matter what ; ) Last BMD and Fuji releases will bring some trouble not only to them ; -)

I am glad they have no clue what this means : -D

Really?! LOL ; -) Indeed. To me, takes the previous one outdated and expensive. I am waiting for their IBIS add-on into X-H2 version.

I think the question is: you have both GH5S and now the X-T3. Why such a new one purchase? Too many similar options. GH5S will struggle to beat any of both competitors for new buyers anyway. Best a new GH5/GH5S as GH6 all in one. Best to do. To end to complicate a bit more : D IBIS and decent AF would simplify that though. Go figure now if those highlights would roll-off before clipping and be much smoother instead... ; -)

Don, I guess people are too much focused on color. I even find myself on much more love about great B&W BTW... LOL Nothing about that on and from my observation. Neither on his enthusiasm I am one of his early supporters and loyal reader of his helpful findings : ) You see how people can distort some point? Damn you, Glenn! hehe : -)

In fact. Their upcoming FF offer seems to follow the new rule. Eagering to see how much the price of that one will be, though. Didn't buy the 12-35mm f/2.8 anyway. Relative fast f/1.7 primes as much it is possible to find at MFT end are affordable and no more no less lightweight, at least. Talks a MFT lover BTW because of its versatility among other Goodies. I believe and hope the new Blackmagic toy will push the format. Take a look on the marvelous match seems to happen with that 12-35mm f/2.8 one from the initial sample tests to pop up. You can even use ludicrously cheap C-mount lenses there! @Mattias Burling These native language correctors at Android side are ending too 'inaccurately artistic' for my taste haha and they're killing me... LOL I obviously meant 'principle' instead! : -D

As already written, this should have a thread by its own IMO. Always nice to discuss different cameras and even no less distinct approach on methodology to follow. I just think we should erase the stuff of our own as much as possible or dying to try at least : ) Not pleasant to see the penalty to overcome. There's place for a random end anytime, subjectivity can lock a door to accuracy outside though : -)

Fun comparison? I concur. Not about to exclude that terrific tool, on the contrary (I think you're going much biased on here man, a pity : ) I like this guy (I guess he fairly : D knows it : )) Not the point though. I'd just rather have accuracy to avoid misleading perceptions right there. That's it : -)

Your in your own, mate. You're deadly wrong there, sorry to have to tell you. The title says it all: "Big Camera Shootout 2018". Apart to not take it literally, let's be fair here ; ) color comes in your mind. A camera comparison is beyond personal takes, my good fellow of boards : ) Most of you here can be wrong here and still think this should be a democracy... LOL : -)

Mattias, fairness is a príncipe for accuracy to happen. We're not speaking about artistic 'moods' here, are we? ; -)

LOL So you"d have a comparison between sensor sizes, not about cameras... ; -)

So we can overboost the smaller ones, isn'it? Aside the fact, the smaller sensor size down to MFT the more competitive glass you"ll find at your pocket ; -)

But, they use different sensor sizes... : -)

Glenn, give your tolerance a break : ) There's nothing wrong on constructive criticism. I only find that test is not the fairness itself ; ) It surely is a private test. I just think my observation is rather pertinent. That test sould also have its own thread BTW, not in this one here.

Despite I appreciate your answer, you should use a faster lens for a fair comparison with MFT as for instance or will become misleading as happened so. Take a look on that FF sample there. Not a tragedy but you could remake it as you intend an accurate outcome. Sorry mate for this time (E : -)

Indeed man @Andrew Reid, you da rock! Better yet than from still photographs... You know what? Your voice really sounds! What a voice, pal! : ) Tells a bit the fact this guy writing here now is also connected with the radio industry as well for more than 3 decades today? ; ) In a personal note, you also look like a dearest cousin of mine! Pretty familiar your persona, without mention to already read you for some good years. Nice to meet you : ) Dave is also going great but frankly, next time you will need two microphones... LOL Can't wait for the upcoming stuff to pop up from you Andrew but also from you two @DaveAltizer : -)

Not user here. I guess ISO6400 without Neat Video or alike, though.

@DBounce Thanks for your comparative : ) However, it is apples to oranges, isn't it? DOF doesn't match. You're using different sensor size camera units. You can't compare a chocolat pie with a lemon pie if you don't add the same quantity of sugar : )) Applied focal length is also crucial : -)

On the spot. This camera brand has mojo... There's (regular) MFT and MFT by Blackmagic. Not the same camera format (better than calling it sensor/mount format ; -)

LOL In fact : ) I guessed so. I also love 42.5mm f/1.7 on MFT. I know your love for that other f/1.2 ; -)

35mm equivalent or in such terms, of course. That is, focal length obviously doesn't change based on the sensor format, the FOV does. So, for the subject matter, take it as you're shooting FF ; ) My first cup of tea is 30-35mm. A bit wide, less than regular perspective, the way humans see the world, but already far enough from reality. More versatile than others IMO once you can use it for portrait but ready for street shooting as you wish. Being a widest my 3rd choice and a telephoto lens for fourth, preferentially a zoom because of several re-framing options I may have. Needless to say the 2nd place. Yours? The most focal lengths you use will dictate the product you output as much as the duration of your shots or the scale, your editing style. If you'd choose one sole prime lens, which one would it be?

At minute 0:45, it is also there. But blurred by the 720p version on YT, much less. And not visible at minute 0.41/0:42 depending on the resolution you have, so... As usual, blur is the key when the acquisition device has no OLPF. GH5 also lacks OLPF, in any case here is an interesting comparison: source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGTKBnbyxgM

LOL : ) I saw you've asked for the vimeo copy... Have you already checked it there?