Emanuel

Really? Funny. Seems hybrids have yet to evolve. Oh well, their makers at least. What about the users? The jury declines to rule out.

How come?! You'll exactly have the same DOF as much as f/4 you have going with FF. 12-35mm f/2.8 is lighter but slower comparing with FF where you have +2 stops of difference, so f/4 (FF) it is still 1-stop faster (35mm equivalent). You show to handle all that in your math though... so?! : -) Ah, you mean, lighter? Mirrorless is lighter. Go figure when you'll put your hands in your glass for the new large format by Panasonic... Weren't you so enthusiastic about the idea? ; -)

I'd even much appreciate FUJI might send you some unit to you there for testing it out. I'd say the same to the other brand under our spotlight these hot days... @CaptainHook @John Brawley Rather than those Asian testers not only geographically distant from their European customers, left to the end of the road as seems so. October arrived. "Photokina is much more than a show of new products", as they say. Well, 'media convergence' nowadays too.

Dennis, you know it may become pretty misleading without proper testing and time for checking the best from your settings out. Balcony tests are rubbish : ) Thanks anyway to hear especially from you (E : -)

https://www.newsshooter.com/2018/09/28/zeiss-zx1-full-frame-compact-with-built-in-adobe-lightroom/

Because you can have a better updated mirrorless camera body with you and save the phone device when the best acquisition tool is the one you can use it... As simple as that ; ) To be on budget doesn't mean to be restricted to a single budget, unless you are a high-school student living with and from resources of your own : -)

Almost there ; ) I wouldn't pay much more for such in any way other than as pretext to charge more for my services ; -)

They will surely release their X-H2 to expand their X-Trans IV introduction now; you'll pay 400 bucks for IBIS from Feb/March on, my best bet earlier than the 33mm f/1 bomb will be added to their lineup one year later: f/1.8 FF or 35mm equivalent without mention focal reducers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujifilm_X-Trans_sensor

As much as f/2 on MFT or f/2.4 on APS-C (Fuji users tend to appreciate their 16-55mm f/2.8... but I second that one, man ; ) In any case, my 24-105 f/4 is one of my favs ever : -)

Both of you are right. Life. E : -)

Not even at AF continuous mode?

Not yet there? I see it as the most significant difference to tap to focus as for instance.

As for instance other than the one from Peau Productions? Do you know other makers?

Can you add a test sample along the wide end of that 18-35mm f/1.8 please?

+2 stops as @ntblowz posted. Here's an interesting article on topic: http://www.dvxuser.com/articles/article.php/21

Right Don : ) But don't stress the codec too much or there's no bit rate to handle it. Know your tool : ) That video up there sold me, among others even despite that orange & teal : -D

Thanks guys. here we have some interesting video samples on both zooms and primes from same shooter: As well, the 35mm f/1.4 and 16-55mm f/2.8 going on AF from an usual suspect:

I am positively impressed -- above my most optimistic expectations:

Tracking is actually the most significant difference to the Blackmagic offer : -)

Exactly my cup of tea. Random AF is rather frightening BTW, even though I concur makes some sense for gimbal use... And here's some teaser to you ; -)

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/pocket-cinema-camera-4k-european-launch-event-registration-50396784138 Today directly from my email inbox: To the European Launch of the new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K! Join us and the Blackmagic team in London on Wednesday, October 10th to mark the introduction of the new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K. You will see the first projects shot with the camera, meet the filmmakers and get some hands-on time, as well as a night of music, food and drinks!

You don't track focus on your upcoming P4K but you'll be able to push AF focus anyway ; -)