Emanuel

Canon is a great brand, not only addressed to camera releases, c'mon... I never regretted to buy Canon so far but I make my choices based on their best offer, as happens with everything, other manufacturers included, obviously.

Yeah, I will update you in a week or so... Hold your horses, guys! : -)

In fact, these torture tests don't reflect a realistic use. Seems a great tool. I hope to have it between the end of week and the beginning of next one. Let's wait and see.

I'd bet on the upcoming Leica 10-25mm f/1.7, definitely a no-brainer if not too far from the $1K mark.

Absolutely. I find this test sample much more interesting though, apart the subject : -)

Small sensors under 1-inch are too limited for anything other than wide shots going along deep DOF and flat 2D looking. Period. E : -)

I will have one on my hands along this week, I hope. There are also other threads open on topic:

@Topcat Best test ever seen to triple match slowmo, a gimbal shot and nice bokeh from that kit lens. For your 1st video ever and if she is your fiancée, double compliments fellow : ) My top hat : -)

@Trek of Joy Chris, is your 56mm f/1.2 unit the APD or regular versions? E : -)

The same with X-H2 just on the corner. Will definitely be a bomb. Hard to beat for a while if for soon as I hope.

"Blackmagic Pocket 4K's ISO10,000 still usable? Yes, with Neat Video. The noise level in ISO10,000 from the new Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K is as noisy as ISO3200 from the Panasonic GH5. The best part about the Pocket 4K's HFR is that there are no signs of banding. Keep in mind that in ProRes, even in 120fps, it is still 10-bit." source: https://vimeo.com/294680968

A shill dude being hit by EOSHD squad! : -D

What a combo, man... Slide like it's butter : -D

WTH !? They treated him like they did. He posted this one here a triple hours away of yours... ...and you still complain? He simply doesn't have much more to say... Cannot say. I had 28 camera units to implement and they did the same... so?!

People should tend to stop seeing the world B&W. Fits only (good) photography... LOL Some other beef to annoy me is when people don't let to themselves the right of sharing the other side's angle. In some other words: ...it is not allowed to the other side to have the same standpoint we seem to already have taken exclusively treated but in a condescending manner. Pathetic to say the least. The world is free for everyone, like the sun when it rises.

Who was the poster BTW? Because with the current level of technology we have, IBIS and AF makes as much sense as your thread and discussion. I wouldn't consider anyone to be serious including yourself inferring such silly statement though ; ) Natively at my own, we're used to say where the trouble is: trousers' fault or the arse, to be honest...? : D When people lack to add context to favor the proof by assertion up to the fallacy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_the_stone Nothing about laziness, even though lazy filmmaking is up for ages. Hollywood blockbusters audience to begin with. It is more related to one-shooter-show, hybrids and digital can afford. Small and lightweight setups where you can handle ideas rather than targets on budget, that is, a sort of continuation of the new wave movements some decades later. Antonioni would have loved it. I personally heard Tonino Guerra himself to label these small devices as the sunny future of filmmaking.

LOL Indeed... : -) Thumbs up! : -) Who does? ; ) They don't support nor award any enthusiasm outside their bubble. This is not a good selling point. Other than that, BRAW effectively is -- a bit from where their arrogance comes to be honest from my own experience : -)

David is surely a reputable voice not connected with BMD as much as RED : D or any other manufacturer. I see him as brand agnostic as me, I guess : ) I don't believe shills are coming here, not BMD type, I think. My beef with them is just related to business policies and their obsession with broadcast market. Even though, they struggle to move on. Just not as quick as a few people, myself included, would like. I am their supporter from day one. I believe and know they could care about us outside better than they actually do. Too stuck on their organization chain. It is necessary to listen everyone. That's what I'd much appreciate to see from their own : -) Even because there's no other Pocket 4K out there. With RAW acquisition as for instance amongst other Goodies?! Where...? ; -)

Wait for BRAW and you'll be able to check what that does mean ; -)

I see it overpriced when there's P4K and you admit you have no need for AF nor IBIS : ) I'd add, it is obvious then. At a certain point, I wonder if you are any shill to promote over here the new Lady... LOL : -)

MFT is the most versatile cinema mount you can find, so you can add from affordable native f/1.7 primes as for instance -- I've had reports 12-35mm f/2.8 is a good match for P4K as well. Both pretty affordable Oly 12-50mm f/3.5‑6.3 and Panny 45-175 f/4.0-5.6 offer you electric-powered zoom capability like you had a video camera in your hands. Without mention the Queen 18-35mm (I'm afraid longer focal length zoom won't make much sense once much heavier) f/1.8 coupled to a focal reducer where ends +1 to + 1 1/3 stop of gain and finally, those incredibly cheap C-mount pieces. There's no other mount where you can add almost everything you want, even PL mount lenses via adapter. So you are in some special territory where you can even mimic something midway S35mm film and FF look as you wish : -)

People infer it is hard to get good outcome with the Pocket. I see exactly the opposite. No experience with it yet. The idea I get from there is that you won't need to struggle with highlights in order to have them under control. The absence of artifacts, moiré, etc. For the price too. Clean low light performance, but also pleasant filmic noise where happens. High standard codecs (let alone BRAW when will arrive) will keep away the usual 8-bit macroblocking we tend to see from low bit rate. Aside the fact you won't easily find that film-like look unless going to post with other digital acquisition tools (when not much limited to below 10-bit), count on it ; ) Not to mention all the stuff this brand has gotten us used to it. Don't tell me the price range is irrelevant... LOL ; -) There's no other similar offer in the segment and that's nice to know. A good reason to demand top service from the manufacturer. Business policies related, as well. In a word, a no-brainer : -)

Is this in the camera menu?! Oh God... LOL : -)