-
Posts
6,769 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by Emanuel
-
Very well, you said so. God spoke! LOL I firmly disagree. I am even quoting other posters asking something from my side WTH, can I !?? Do you allow me so? : D Inappropriate is you to not forget former discussions with me trying to somehow hurt me wherever you think you can. Sorry to bother you with communication between other people and me in front of your eyes. Stop to salivate and let's move on ; ) I don't even write anymore the full portrait I have in my mind about you exclusively from your behaviour in these boards. Ignore my posts, man, live your life in peace! Because this ends to be pretty pathetic...
-
Where have you seen it ANYTHING else advertised by me? Moreover, here?! Isn't that the whole point of the observation? Yours? It is even funny, when you are the anonymous, I am here with my ID and real name perfectly undisclosed. People ask brand names, I address them out of here. So, your point that could have its merit, I could even agree with it if it was true, it is just pointless and unfair because it is rather false. The last part of your post finely shows your style. You invariable try the character assassination mantra of those ones outside of your liking. You ARE abusive. You try to judge other people from your lonely highness, exactly accusing others of your own personality. Imputing traces you want they imply. Because you said so. C'mon, give you a better scope of yourself! Save your personal hates to the privacy of your own. Don't come here to show-off your personal agenda on old issues. Let alone unsolved stuff from your past, I see it now, unfortunately. It is not the first time, hope could be the last one. I told you before, I dislike to write it again: save your crap to the PM box as you wish. Pity to address your attitude so straightforward but it is what it is. You choose, you have it. With all due respect as well : D I'm sorry, I can't help you out. Personal stuff, like personal hate(s), envy and so on should be solved in the right place. Not here. Sad to see.
-
Save your usual personal attacks addressed to me from past and futile discussions from your side to your playground. You can also do it through PM where I can send you my personal details where you can easily find me face to face in real life. Let's see your attitude then ; -)
-
I am not the manufacturer. I am just a player. I started this thread with an idea in mind. To select one from the usual suspects for the projects I participate either as shooter or 'only' as producer. I realized then there was a gap to fulfill. There's no a suitable gimbal for this camera. I've entered in touch with manufacturers through channels I already have from b2b field, consulting realm and b2c e-commerce sectors where I have a share in a few partnerships. I've spent my own time to help some other people from manufacturing area to find answers to directly satisfy this market. Business has rules to succeed being secrecy one of them in order to protect my own time and work before all business details will be settled. Hope this entry of mine may enlighten any doubts. Sincere thanks for your interest, understanding and open mind. E : -)
-
It CAN be cleaner, it is not necessarily clean if you need, want or look for something else... You can have 1 million if you'll have a 10-million account. The opposite is harder to achieve on the other hand ; -)
-
The gimbal is ready to ship for delivery. There are other business details to finish these days. Thanks for your interest! As already posted, to those ones interested, just put your place in the line through PM please : -)
-
Still waiting for listening the other ML EOS M shooters... Thanks for your input. One of the more interesting modes looks like the 1x3 binning 2.35:1 1504x1920. How's the situation there as far as 'framing conditions' (funny to use the expression : D) concerns? The other mode is the one used by @ZEEK, but he's here and hasn't added anything on topic... To be able to have half of the frame between left and right limits (with the upper half of the frame at least) can result in a workaround. That is, if we get used to it. Especially if we consider the price to pay ending as highest as possible resolution where we may raise and park the bar. Stretched vertically for binning modes doesn't sound so bad under the circumstances in the end. To be able of an accurate framing preview even pixelated (a trouble for focusing but we can alternate and mix both preview routes or no?) before start shooting can be a workaround for static shots, we can just fairly guess. Or where you have to put the framing borders inside (y)our head. Does AF work at least? And what about HDMI for external monitoring?
-
This ML tool reminds me when 35mm film, not only IQ and grain. Priceless. One of a kind, today. Also how to properly shoot with. Where any camera movement had to be previously planned in order to not waste film/lab fees/money. Pardon my lack of modesty now if so but, obviously, people only used to shoot video actually have no idea what does mean. - E : -)
-
Nothing against static shots... : ) As matter of fact, as purist, bothers me unmotivated camera movement to be rather straightforward here. I can't avoid to often add frequent rolleyes with the most part of footage seen today. It is what it is though : -) What about those pinkframes? Is the usable percentage of footage so bad going with high resolution pixel binning? I'd like to hear a stable setup resolution for. From your side, EOS M ML users.
-
So no highlights or under control underexposing a bit, no pinkframes? The same using ratio presets? What's the percentage average you get with along of usable footage you are able to find in the end going on 1504x1920 1x3 binning mode? And what's the safest highest resolution for 2.35:1 continuous 24p or 25p?
-
Yet on that difference between British and American English, I think pop culture has had a significant role to inspire editing as for instance. Also directing BTW. And new distribution channels have imposed a dominant style to hardly leave versus the fundamentals exactly as you wrote, Kye. It is a delicate balance. But a reward concomitantly. Towards a future-proof to not lose of sight a whole century of film language and semiotics in our back. Here's where Don's @webrunner5 entry fits ; ) Pardon for a bit of fake modesty from my side as well : P E : -)
-
@kye this forum is not the same since you've landed. Kudos for your posting : ) My vote for a new mod! : -)
-
recognise versus recognize -- I had to say no to the spell checker ; ) "it" because that's all about your style instead, not exactly addressed to you : ) Once you said you're curious on the way people see it, I wonder if you recognise yourself from that one, that's all : )) You are much more than the source. We are all entitled to be receptors in these days of reader-response criticism. And it's always a curious exercise to see people to deal with the scope of others over their own -- sorta OP's sub-topic/subplot, you won't probably let me down, I guess (E : -)
-
What about my description on yours? Do you recognise (with "S" : D) it there?
-
OK, Mark once you mentioned, here we go : D https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestations_of_postmodernism "(...) Bricolage- building a film like a collage of different film styles and genres." Very typical where most recent tech resources have actually helped that to happen.
-
Independent arthouse has several possible routes which character-driven is one of those I feel closer to, as well, the incommunicability as subject... where I think both space and time fit in a very special and particular way (E : -)
-
Suspension of disbelief is not necessarily the only way to arrive there. Take a glance on Brecht approach as for instance with his V-effekt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distancing_effect