MattH

I think that channel is bullshit // 100% fake

I'm watching on a 27 inch 5K iMac, so maybe thats the difference because none of what I'm seeing looks remotely "fine." lol

That looks horrendous. Terribly over sharpened, digital, and just plain yucky. Could be upload/export setting, but looks like they have in camera sharpening set way to high. 

Mirrorless, Oled screen, 4k, 1080p slow motion....maybe Samsung did sell some tech Nikon's way?

Exactly! If they put all that stuff in it would double the price and more importantly it would never be released because they would never finish it.

Exactly! If they put all that stuff in it would double the price and more importantly it would never be released because they would never finish it.

Exactly! If they put all that stuff in it would double the price and more importantly it would never be released because they would never finish it.

That goes against their entire philosophy which have always been: a box with the best possible, uncompressed image at a low price, you do the rest.

You can turn off the nofitication by clicking the bell of the notification on the top right side of this page, then click the notification setting. There you can turn off the sound, or do everything you want.

I certainly wouldn't complain.

If GH5 did transition over to a S35 sensor. It would be great if they can do an mft mode where the sensor crops to mft, to utilize mft lenses. Then you'd have use of both systems MFT and S35. Then mft lenses won't become obsolete, cool idea if this happened.

And make all their lenses obsolete?  I can't see that happening.  It would be nice just to have a multi aspect sensor like the GH2 with no crop for 4k.  That would be a 1.8/1.9 crop and still alow their lenses to be used.   There would still be pleanty of options to entice:  Global shutter, 10 bit all I internal/ raw.

So a 1:1 center crop of the D500's 20.9 MP image to get a UHD frame results in a total crop factor of how much? My back of the envelope says 2.2 ish?

Maybe it is the noise, but the besides the look, film seems to have something that makes subjects come alive.  As you have said in the youtube comments, Gunpowder jumping is the obvious example. But also in the shot of yourself at the end.  The film shot would look great cut into a home movie reel or music video compared to the sony where you just look bored.

No, the values are re-mapped.  So black is 16 and white is 235.  So you have the same dynamic range but it is represented by 220 discrete steps instead of 256.

What the fuck was that bullshit?
I thought it was going to be an actual short film.  Why does an arbitrary video of nothing have a name?
It looks like a perfume advert that is too long and was thrown out for being too cleche.
As for the look of the footage. Ok, nothing spelbinding. A bit videoey in certain shots.

What the fuck was that bullshit?
I thought it was going to be an actual short film.  Why does an arbitrary video of nothing have a name?
It looks like a perfume advert that is too long and was thrown out for being too cleche.
As for the look of the footage. Ok, nothing spelbinding. A bit videoey in certain shots.

What the fuck was that bullshit?
I thought it was going to be an actual short film.  Why does an arbitrary video of nothing have a name?
It looks like a perfume advert that is too long and was thrown out for being too cleche.
As for the look of the footage. Ok, nothing spelbinding. A bit videoey in certain shots.

What the fuck was that bullshit?
I thought it was going to be an actual short film.  Why does an arbitrary video of nothing have a name?
It looks like a perfume advert that is too long and was thrown out for being too cleche.
As for the look of the footage. Ok, nothing spelbinding. A bit videoey in certain shots.

Reading the other thread and this one I am now pretty convinced that option 1A will be taken.  The current systems are too well established and changing them will just confuse things.   One big advantage for E mount is that you can use virtually any manual lenses.  An advantage for the consumer, but would nikon see it as an advantage for themselves?  You might think flexibility would encourage customers to the system.  It would with me, But from nikons perspective they are probably more comfortable locking people into nikon lenses.   The A7 cameras and FE lenses are already at the stage where there isn't much of difference between them and a DSLR in size. They aren't exactly pocketable.  So really theres no big disadvantage to having an F-mount mirrorless.  In fact this rumor apears to be on the money: http://nikonrumors.com/2015/04/20/new-nikon-full-frame-mirrorless-camera-on-the-horizon.aspx/
Also, a good thing about f-mount for a hybrid camera is that there would be plenty of room to integrate behind the lens filters.
But thinking again about the NX-mini lenses, perhaps the primes could be rehoused in a recessed configuration which would make them look like body cap lenses.

Nah. Adapting to NX is still a pain.
They just need to copy what Sony did. The E-mount covers both APS-C and full frame, is wildly adaptable to just about anything you'd like to throw at it. Even Sony's own A-mount lenses through the Sony A- to E-mount adapter with translucent mirror tech and built-in AF motor. Or throw on a third party lens with electronic connectivity. Even use focal reducers! Forget that with a NX-mount. I really don't see any future there. 'But they can use the lens line-up'. Yeah well, they can also get you Nikon lenses... Listen. Sony had to start E-mount somewhere too. And like 43 to M43 and A to E-mount with a manufacturer's adapter, you can take your already excisting eco system and give it a new market as well.
They only need to copy what Sony did and do it for with Nikon adapting priorities. So a solid adapter for Nikon glass as well. Not a native existing Nikon DSLR-mount, that'd be silly to put on something mirrorless. And the NX-mount isn't going to work either.

Why make millions of people buy adapters because a few people own samsung lenses, makes no sense at all.
Even if they don't go with the F mount, why choose a mount designed for APS-C sensors if you can make a larger one and skip the problems that sony is having with the e-mount (shadowing)

Where are you re-locating to, Mars?  Can't be back to England or somewhere else in Europe as you'd just drive that shit there.

I'm still waiting for the first example of a truly natural grade from the A7sii s-log3. All the graded footage so far looks like the instagram-filter s-log footage I really dislike (ymmv).
For me the natural look is the acid test of a camera's capabilities. Washed out artistic grades hide a multitude of sins.

Na sorry, take that bulshit back to DVX user, this is 2015.  Full frame means 36mm wide. Get over it.