Matins 2

I hadn't seen it yet, just now... delicious! Thanks for sharing, mate @Matins 2 :- )

Thanks for the helps Matins. I just simply following the steps from this article. 

$2,999.99
https://store.asus.com/us/item/202101AM120000009/ROG-Flow-X13-Ultra-Slim-2-in-1-Gaming-Laptop-Bundle%3A-ROG-XG-Mobile%2BRTX-3080-included

$2,999.99
https://store.asus.com/us/item/202101AM120000009/ROG-Flow-X13-Ultra-Slim-2-in-1-Gaming-Laptop-Bundle%3A-ROG-XG-Mobile%2BRTX-3080-included

The basic problems are always the same. Billions of poor people who can't unite to overthrow the handful of riches. Fucking the planet, regret doing it and keep doing it, rinse&repeat. Koyaanisqatsi has 40 years. 
It would be great if we could tackle at least one of those before human extinction. 

New blog post:
https://www.eoshd.com/news/wonder-woman-1984-movie-review-crimes-against-men-and-children/

I'd be lying if I said that I truly care what the average citizen likes or dislikes.

Such a great image.
Definitely not optimistic about 2021.

Here's my review of 2020 in cameras / filmmaking. Doesn't make for easy reading so take a stiff gin with you to this article...
https://www.eoshd.com/news/a-review-of-the-year-2020-by-andrew-reid/

Hi everyone!
I loved this camera so much that I developed a flip screen modification to make this little machine even more powerful.
Now you can install this modification yourself. I hope you like it.
https://youtu.be/oCaNpCX3c3o
 

The oldest preserved photograph (adjusted), by Nicéphore Niépce. Taken around 1826 using a box with a hole in it, a lens and a pewter plate coated with natural asphalt. 🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_from_the_Window_at_Le_Gras
https://photo-museum.org/niepce-invention-photography/

Nice thumbnail.:) @Matins 2 Daguerreotype, right. Pristine film look would be possible with a BMPCC as the cheapest option, in 4K one could try a used G9 in HLG with the 10bit update for 600 or 700usd. I already got a run for my money years ago filming 8bit HD, in natural profile and 100mbit with the GH5, because the 10bit codec was still new for Davinci Resolve :) Mission accomplished:)
For even mored dependable results use a PMW F3 with its external 10bit output. They gotten more expensive now due to their good rep. Would love to get my hands on a F5 or shoot something meaningful with my F3 first. :)

The question was raised to discuss and share information about the technical side of digital cameras, specifically their sensor technologies compared to film. Questions that come to mind are: which sensors come closest and why, in what way could they be improved, and what makes them better if their image quality has surpassed film (which I don't think is the case)? It wasn't exactly raised to discuss the use of certain cameras in productions.

Two different mediums 
 
not a question of catching up
 
the difference between working with Kodak film and digital video is substantial when you a pursuing a career 
 
Thats why I have a film camera  in my gear bag

Arri had a film matrix (page 9 I think) that allowed for colorists to intercut between film and Alexa footage more easily:
https://www.samys.com/images/pdf/ALEXA-Color-Processing-White-Paper.pdf
But they discontinued it. I've heard it's difficult to work with, but I think over time the digital look has become more standard anyway. The F35, C300, and Alexa all felt like different imitations of film to me, whereas today everything feels more like Alexa or an imitation of Alexa. Which makes sense. You imitate the contemporaneous standard format.
There are technical difficulties from a sensor design perspective, but I don't really understand them. Full well capacity is a physical limitation (think of each photo site as a bucket collecting drops of light) that dictates highlight dynamic range (once the bucket fills, the highlight clip). Bigger pixels mean a greater full well capacity, but so do improved sensor designs. It's no coincidence that the Alexa has the lowest resolution and the most highlight detail. With film it's sort of the opposite: Kodak added smaller grains of film to get two stops more highlight detail in with 5219 500T film stock than with the prior generation.
But if you like the look of S16... why not shoot S16? It is definitely the cool thing to do now.

I mean the Alexa comes close. RED Komodo is global shutter. 

I do think the Alexa surpassed film. It has great color rendition and amazing latitude. 

What I was saying is that there hasn't been a digital camera on the market that has matched the look of film in all its complexities. Of course shooting on an Alexa you can mimic it with post processing due to the flexibility of the files coming off that camera. Same goes for anything that can shoot RAW. 

The 1DC is nice but I wouldn't say its on par with film. The color science is nice but its not mimicking any certain film stock. It also won't respond like film does to under or over exposure. Over exposing the 1DC will result in a digital clippy mess. 

Oh, come on.  The empty and grandiose filmmaking of Nolan and Tarantino helped bury cinema long before streaming.    Essential human drama?  Please.

VHS cassettes, unsocialized audience members and multiplexes killed the "theatrical experience" for most thoughtful adults, years ago.  The Hitchcock ideal of 2000 people coming to the Church of Cinema once or twice a month was dead before he was.  
There are people now who see more drama in a day than most of humanity did in a lifetime.  No form of art or entertainment can survive that much accessibility.  These days, everything is a passing diversion.  King Lear or reruns of Two and A Half Men, it's all the same.