
spinkscapes
Members-
Content Count
38 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About spinkscapes

-
Rank
Member
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
TurboRat reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
IronFilm reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
graphicnatured reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
proteanstar reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
Adept reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
webrunner5 reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
Emanuel reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
seanzzxx reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
Kisaha reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
omega1978 reacted to a post in a topic: X-T3 or Pocket 4K?
-
Just so readers can decide themselves how the cameras match together I'll give you a breakdown of the setups: Shot 1 - invitation - Blackmagic Pocket 4K with Voigtlander 25mm f/0.95 (ordinarily shot at f/1.4-2.0); Shot 2 - dress zipping - BMPCC 4K & V 25mm f/0.95; Shot 3 - engagement ring macro - Canon C200 with Canon 100mm f/2.8L with a Rotolight; Shot 4 - bride putting on ring - - BMPCC 4K & V 25mm f/0.95 shot wide open; Shot 5 - bride reflection - BMPCC 4K & V 25mm f/0.95; Shot 6 - groom tie (close up) - Canon C200 with Canon 85mm f1.4L IS; Shot 7 - bride and g
-
That's the C200 with the 85mm f1.4L IS. Which, as I said, was designated to third camera as we tried out the new toys on Saturday.
-
ser from Saturday's wedding. The predominant camera is the X-T3 on the gimbal. There's also quite a few shots in there from the Pocket 4K, a couple of from our trusty C200 (taking a back seat to the other cameras) and one from the 5D mkIV. Impressions of the two cameras after two weddings: 1. The X-T3 is the perfect camera for the Zhiyun Crane 2. It is perfectly balanced even before turning the gimbal on. This wedding I used it entirely with my new 18-55mm at the wide end as I wanted the IS. The 2. The Blackmagic Pocket 4K is something else. Utterly magnificent. With
-
Modern vs retro. Already I love the intuitive menu system and the 5 inch screen of the Pocket 4K. The current data rates on any slow motion 4K footage however....
-
Just received my Pocket 4K, incidentally the day following receiving my XT-3. Got a wedding to shoot on Saturday so good timing.
-
What speedbooster did you land on? Don't worry. Answered above.
-
Then they have to be prepared to lose out big time for sales to Panasonic and Blackmagic.
-
I much prefer the build of my Micro rather than the build of my GH4.
-
Sony FS5 II announced with 4K 120fps RAW recording at NAB 2018
spinkscapes replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Weird, after watching the video I decided that the skin tones were way too unnatural and unflattering to me. -
spinkscapes reacted to a post in a topic: Sony FS5 II announced with 4K 120fps RAW recording at NAB 2018
-
Premiere have updated their support for Cinema RAW Lite so I really have little use for a "middle" codec anymore.
-
Either Sony releases a comparable camera form factor that delivers UHD at 60p or they have conceded that they can't compete with the GH5. Doubt that they will make such a concession.
-
Probably not the person to ask as: a. I've never shot with the C100; and b. I've always shot the C200 at UHD. I know the "no middle codec" makes the C200 dead in the water for many but I preferred the C200 for a variety of reasons, not least of which: 1. better autofocus; 2. internal RAW; 3. the EVF; 4. the Canon skin tones; and 5. my familiarity with the Canon menu system. I find that the size difference between a HQ Pro-res file and the Cinema RAW lite is negligible and the post-production workflow issues I currently contribute to Adobe's incompetence rather than
-
I have a C200. Absolutely stunning camera. Didn't even consider the EVA1 or watch any reviews so can't compare.
-
Much happier using the C200 than I ever was using the FS7, but each to their own.