Jump to content

Rinad Amir

Members
  • Posts

    625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rinad Amir

  1. 20 hours ago, FHDcrew said:

    To add to my post, external recording is the biggest thing I would give up. Being able to record 12-bit RAW internally would be idea. I wish camera manufacturers would add uncompressed CDNG recording to their flagships. Compressed RAW is such a mess…patents and external workarounds…and then one does not necessarily have freedom of choice when it comes to what NLE to edit the RAW footage in…unless one converts. 
     

    Give us uncompressed RAW to the card. Or give us Prores 4444 12-bit. The codec everyone has forgotten about 😆 

    Id pay good money for that alone imagine going light without cage! and extra cables dangling around.

  2. My a7s iii has all the bells and whistles, so i cannot imagine downgrade sacrifice one bit of it ! other than external modules like heavy ass ninja V that i have to carry around with me 😮💨 for manny reasons such as bright monitor & 12bit raw yada yada yada and so on 😅

  3. On 4/13/2023 at 2:52 PM, markr041 said:

    Yes, I acquired the a7siii when it first came out for its video features. It was the best option, then. As soon as the fx3 was introduced I traded. The fx3 was clearly superior as a video tool, even without the updates.

    I agree not upgrading the a7siii is deliberate marketing. But if the new features of the fx3 are important and one's profession is video it seems odd to not trade up.

    If a professional hangs on to the a7siii, then it is actually clear the new features are unimportant to her. The trade up cost is a tax-reducing investment and is a trivial expense, again, for a professional making a living based on video quality.

    Just whining is not professional. Worse are those who say they will never buy Sony again over this. That is surely not professional.

    Can you please stop being Sony apologiest for moment and explain how was fx3 Supervisior to a7siii? Exactly in image quality? Also post some of your work so we can see the big difference in superiority as you claim ,so far internet claims both has identical hardware .

    Just admit it 

  4. 9 hours ago, PannySVHS said:

    I gave you a like for your unusual choice @Rinad Amir of camera. Noooot:) But for the Konica 35-100 F2.8 which you might have combined with it, which a I got because of your recommendation. Best direct lens recommendation I got, besides my 8EUR Tokina 25-50 F4 from @andy lee, one of Eoshds lens connoisseurs.

    I put my Fs700 to a bit of use for some additional income, in HD 420 mostly. S1 got a little share of that. GX85 my eternal love, awesome beautiful image taker and camera. Sony PMW F3 waiting to get any use:) BMMCC used for some camera enjoyment. 5D2 and 3 to test which one is cooler for raw video and hopefully not collecting dust with the F3. Second FS700 never used, collecting dust. BMPCC og collecting dust. I am a dust collector like my lenes. Don´t start me on lenses:) Still got a G7, Oly Pen EP2 and E-PL1 🙂 

    Looking forward to see some (moving) images from your beauties. 🙂 @Ty Harper @majoraxis

    Welcome back to the forum @kye 🙂  

    I forgot to mention my glasses 😅

    24-70gm ii

    50mm 1.4gm

    35mm 1.8  so yah 🤣

  5. On 6/23/2022 at 3:26 PM, Amazeballs said:

    If they would work with other cameras with gyro like the latest Sony cameras, that would be even better. I am tired of waiting for gyroflow Resolve plugin. 

    This! Could save us hours of pain.

    I use currently sony software to stabilise my footage export etc then hit davinci , but im delighted Davinci is stepping up its game.

  6. Hey Folks 

    Anyone owns this lens and care to share their experience please.

    Am looking for 50mm for video mainly on Alpha 7siii has anyone got this combo?

    Ive read couple reviews and watched few videos so far it has minimal focus breathing which is bonus for me, now autofocus is where i see mixed reviews about it 🙄 i know perfect lens doesn't exist but sure.

  7. On 12/22/2021 at 10:07 PM, Fatalfury said:

    Just came back from the cinema. Film itself aside. What the hell, one of the ugliest uncinematic shot with a phone looking film I have seen in the cinema! Reminded me Hobbits (which looked actually good in 24p) 48fps experience, but this was 24frames and still looked like a cheap tv show.
    Usually when trailers don't look that great, the films end up looking good in cinemas but this somehow looked worse. Difference was staggering when there were shots from the old trilogy thrown in, why are the filmakers/Wachowski ok with this?

    You know a movie you watch once and never again ... thats the one! I swear the old ones were millions times better than the new movie.

    Story line was awfull am devastated 😢 

×
×
  • Create New...