Jump to content

kaylee

Members
  • Content Count

    1,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Reputation Activity

  1. Haha
    kaylee got a reaction from mercer in How To Have Quality Video on a Cheap Camera   
    lens caps guys! take em off before shooting
  2. Haha
    kaylee reacted to IronFilm in Driving Chain Manufacturer Details Lubrication Method   
    Only took three posts to go there!
  3. Haha
    kaylee reacted to Adam Kuźniar in Driving Chain Manufacturer Details Lubrication Method   
    Finally a lubricant that will satisfy my girlfriend! 
  4. Haha
    kaylee reacted to Márcio Kabke Pinheiro in Driving Chain Manufacturer Details Lubrication Method   
    Don't be so hard, lubrication methods are useful for Canon users wanting 24p in the new cameras.
  5. Thanks
    kaylee reacted to fuzzynormal in What's the opposite of "produce"?   
    Andy Kaufman
    Jerry Lawler
    Roddy Piper
    Bob Heenan
    Jimmy Heart
    Rick Flair
    Mick Foley
  6. Like
    kaylee reacted to Snowbro in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    I have had the best luck shooting at a higher frame rate, then slowing it down to 24p and stabilizing. No blurring problems then. Usually no low light issues after 60p recording in 4K and export to about 2.5k in a 4k frame upscale to fit. 
  7. Like
    kaylee reacted to kye in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    When they work out how to un-blur images in post IT WILL BE THE BEST THING THAT HAS EVER HAPPENED TO FILM-MAKING.
    We can record in 1080 and then un-blur to get 4K, or 8K.  All those police shows will come true where they take a blurry video and just keep saying "enhance..... enhance..... enhance..... enhance....." until you can tell where he ate dinner by looking at the individual molecules in the crumbs on his chin.
    In IT, once information is gone, it's gone.
    That requires much better ISO performance than we have currently, plus it would require that the next exposure start immediately after the last exposure stopped, otherwise you'd get gaps in your motion blurs.
    I get that with a high enough frame rate and a bit of AI you could close those gaps pretty easily, but I'd prefer IBIS and the fantastic low-light performance.  Also, this high-framerate plus AI processing doesn't seem to give the smaller-camera plus better battery life that @Snowfun was talking about  
  8. Like
    kaylee reacted to kye in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    That's why I like the IBIS in the GH5 - it stabilises my fully-manual vintage lenses.  Fast, cheap, great MF, great ergonomics and stabilised is a combo that only IBIS provides.
    This is something that I think people don't understand...
    OIS and IBIS stabilise DURING the exposure of each frame - Electronic stabilisation stabilises AFTER the exposure of each frame.

    If you're shaking the camera at all, the fuzzy light-trails and motion blur in each frame can't be fixed by electronic stabilisation.  Every camera with electronic stabilisation is designed for very short exposures - action cameras.  As soon as you want a 180 shutter or work in low light then electronic stabilisation isn't much use.  It means that you throw away all your ND filters, or always use the camera on a gimbal.
    [Edit: this applies to any motion of the camera or any motion in the frame]
  9. Like
    kaylee reacted to Snowbro in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    Being a software guy and seeing what Google has done over the years with pixel. I guarantee you in the somewhat near future, you will see many top cameras only use digital stabilization. It will rock when you have low rolling shutter and use a 6k sensor and output a final image at 4k, or 8k/6k etc. 
    The cameras could get even smaller & lighter with less power consumption. 
    That being said, I dont think canons current digital IS on anything I have seen from them could replace a gimbal. Maybe in 10 years; I would put my money on Panasonic or Fuji.
    Forgot to mention: ibis/lens stabilization always has an odd floaty type feel or unnatural jerky motion to it. I havent seen that oddness when I have just shot handheld on a low rolling shutter camera and stabilized it in post, or just good implementation of digital IS. Low light seems to be the last thing they are figuring out for it, but I would bet that will be resolved quickly. 
  10. Haha
    kaylee reacted to mercer in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    It’s funny you say that, when I glanced at the patent photos, of their IBIS tech, I thought I was looking at schematics for an old watch.
    With that being said, I’d love to have Canon IS level stabilization on all of my lenses. 
  11. Haha
    kaylee reacted to Adam Kuźniar in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    Oh surely it will shoot 6k. But in 15fps, with autofocus and manual exposure disabled. And the IBIS will only work with 3 supported lenses and only when shooting 480p upside down.
  12. Like
    kaylee reacted to Snowbro in 1DX Mark III Prototypes - 6K IBIS   
    This could be interesting, apparently it has been leaked around and people have got their hands on them. I sold most of my DSLR lenses and don't see myself buying more this late in the game. Anyone else probably pass on this even though it likely will put out an amazing picture? There is about a 2% chance they put CLOG in it haha. 
    "It’s likely the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III will shoot 6K video without a crop.
    Dual CFExpress cards are in the prototype models and will likely make it to the production version.
    There will be a “significant jump in resolution for an EOS-1 series camera”.  The EOS-1D X was 18.1mp and the EOS-1D X Mark II came in at 20.2mp. So I guess anything over a 2mp bump could be considered “significant” to some.
    New DIGIC processor. Canon doesn’t usually introduce a new DIGIC processor in the EOS-1D series, but that will apparently change this time.
    IBIS is in prototype cameras"
  13. Like
    kaylee reacted to gethin in Let's discuss computational photography?   
    massive.  prediction: the sort of processing I do on real estate pics will be pretty well dead in 5-10 years time.  They won't be as good, but they will be "good enough".  I can imagine the new image processing software will just have  bunch of looks, and ai will do the rest. This is the reason I'm trying to get out of the game now.  It's bound to come to video, too. 


     
  14. Haha
    kaylee reacted to kye in How To Have Quality Video on a Cheap Camera   
    But but but but...... how else are film-school goths going to get those delicious inky blacks that express the sadness of their souls?
    Someone has to balance out the permanently happy YouTubers who always seem to be on holiday!!
  15. Like
    kaylee reacted to MrSMW in What's the least bang for buck?   
    Is that ^ Canon's latest offering?
    The Canon EOS Desirée. The 'jack of all trades, master of none' (hybrid potato/camera).
  16. Like
    kaylee reacted to Anaconda_ in What's the least bang for buck?   
  17. Like
    kaylee reacted to IronFilm in What's the least bang for buck?   
    I dunno, one single potato is VERY CHEAP! 

    Which helps improve its value ratio of cost to quality. 
  18. Haha
    kaylee got a reaction from EthanAlexander in What's the least bang for buck?   
    i maintain that potato is the least bang for your cinematic buck

  19. Haha
    kaylee got a reaction from kye in What's the least bang for buck?   
  20. Like
    kaylee got a reaction from gethin in What's the least bang for buck?   
    cant afford those red ones
  21. Like
    kaylee reacted to kye in What's the least bang for buck?   
    I disagree.  The future is 360 VR and 3D, and depending on the potato, it can have multiple eyes on all sides!!
  22. Haha
    kaylee reacted to Anaconda_ in What's the least bang for buck?   
    I've heard the peelers you need for those are just generic ones from Lidl wrapped in Waitrose packaging.
  23. Haha
    kaylee reacted to BTM_Pix in What's the least bang for buck?   
    Unless its a RED One.

  24. Like
    kaylee reacted to leslie in What's the least bang for buck?   
    on the upside you can at least boil and eat a potato. While lots of cameras do get roasted on the forum from time to time i have yet to hear of someone actually eating one 😉
  25. Thanks
    kaylee reacted to IronFilm in What's the least bang for buck?   
    They wouldn't be the "LEAST bang for you buck"
×
×
  • Create New...