Jump to content

kaylee

Members
  • Posts

    1,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kaylee

  1. amazing, what a time to be alive

    Quote

    A glance at headlines online from critics who have seen the origin story film gives an idea of the points being illustrated in these conversations. From Refinery29: “Joker Is A Dangerous Film — & It’s Bringing Out The Worst In The Internet”. From Time: “Joker wants to be a movie about the emptiness of our culture. Instead, it’s a prime — and dangerous — example of it.” Vanity Fair suggested Joker, which they deemed “a deeply troubling origin story,” may be “irresponsible propaganda for the very men it pathologizes.” They continue, “Is Joker celebratory or horrified? Or is there simply no difference, the way there wasn’t in ‘Natural Born Killers’ or myriad other ‘America, man’ movies about the freeing allure of depravity?” IndieWire called Joker “a bold but incel-friendly origin story.” “Is this really the time to be lionizing such behavior?,” asked a New Republic writer who admits to having not seen the film.

    https://uk.ign.com/articles/2019/09/25/joker-dangerous-movie-joaquin-phoenix-todd-phillips-interview

     

    thoughts, guys?

    i face the ~exact~ same shit with my harmless, make-believe art practice btw. and there isnt a single gun! this is not abt guns smh

    joaquin-phoenix-joker-movie-trailer.jpg

  2. @Snowbro i mean.... maybe one day lol

    we live in a world where producers/directors/content distributors make, what are in practice, nonsensical demands bc OBVIOUSLY besides some ppl on this board, NO ONE knows 4k from a hole in the wall

    to these morons, 4k = sharper, which = better

    will 6k be a thing for delivery? i say no: the 4k gimmick hasnt worked with consumers, imho. sure, the big manufacturers have sold a lot of tvs, but the ppl who have 4k sets that i know (civilian nonfilmmakers lol) have no idea wtf theyre watching, and dont *feel* the benefit of their higher res tvs, so i highly doubt that those same (rich) ppl are going to get "fooled again" so easily ?at least not in the next few years ?

  3. the lack of a rear image screen is pretty darn cool, i think. if youve ever shot 35mm stills, its a blast from the past...!

    stupid question: will one be seeing 100% of the image through the viewfinder, or is it an oldschool rangefinder approximation...? kno what i mean...? never actually shot w a rangefinder before, so im confused lol

  4. thats an excellent list fuzzy.

    im gonna assume that you mean the immortal manager and member of the gentrys, the mouth of the south jimmy hart, who is ofc no relation to anyone in the hart foundation

    also, andy kaufman was right abt women tbh, ironically

    lawler -- no comment

    piper -- god

    hennan -- total god

    flair -- WOOOOOOOOOOOOO.... GOD

    foley -- hey wait just a min lol

     

    edit: oh whoops, i was supposed to go next, my bad

    names not already mentioned:

    bret hart

    stone cold BAH GAWD steve austin

    flyin brian pillman

    rocky

    cm punk

    nWo

    jim ross

    shawn michaels (ugh)

    razor/scott hall

    ecw

    rob black (google it lol)

    hollywood hogan

    taker

    curt hennig

    rick rude

    million dollar man ted dibiase

    any wild gimmicks lol

     

    Mean Gene: "You're a K. Fabe, aren't you?"

     

     

  5. On 9/13/2019 at 7:19 PM, newfoundmass said:

    What lenses do you have? The Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 is really cheap new or used. There's also a lot of fast vintage glass out there: you can get the Minolta Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.7 for well under $50, or the 50mm f/1.4 for around $50-75. I am just getting my feet wet in some narrative work and I love my Minolta primes; they have such great character. Just lovely glass.

    still waiting to hear what lenses my dp buddy has, hes on vacation and im tryin not to bother him lol

    great suggestions, thank you @newfoundmass – id definitely like to shoot as wide as possible, and a fast realllly wide lens would be great too (like crazy wide). v open to old glass, the weirder the better for this shoot...!

  6. 1 hour ago, fuzzynormal said:

    What did we do with this awesome blessing?

    Produced wrastlin’ videos. Hundreds of them. Story arcs, reoccurring character fueds, the whole bit.

    My role was the interviewer “Mystical Marvin,” and I modeled the character after Mean Gene —with a little bit of Koko B. Ware and The Million Dollar Man for my occasional wrastlin’ appearances.

    NO. FN. WAY!!!! (ecw reference)

    1 hour ago, Mokara said:

    The opposite of "produce" is "consume".

    oh, *SNAP*

    im enjoying this btw, not to change the subject https://fakeseinfeldplots.tumblr.com/

    still havent heard anything that sounds better than "moron" when referring to someone who is ruining a production. it needs to be clearly derogatory 

  7. obstructionist is the EXACT kinda thing i was looking for, but osshole takes the cake

    i love it tbh

    1 hour ago, leslie said:

    in reality,  your better off walking away from such people

    nonono, i dont talk to these ppl, and i fire them frequently, thats my point, theyre frickin everywhere!!!

    i mean a term for "them" en masse, @Video Hummus gets it~! ?

×
×
  • Create New...