BrorSvensson

If you actually remember when you downloaded the trial version of Color Finale, you can simply set back the clock of your computer manually to the date you downloaded the trial version and it'll work again. It's a fantastic product and of course I strongly advise to support them by purchasing their product, but still, this will work. 

Color finale is so worth the money imo.
But you could use Rocky Montain video converter. Convert the files to prores, just to be able to bake in a LUT in the process.

I believe I have found the sdk for the srp. And quite a few examples of the c scripting style used before it is parsed into the machine state and binary. Working backwards it should be possible to figure out how it is compiled and explore what lies inside the system. It seems similar to an fpga so it shouldnt be very hard to dissect. Things that can be added over just changing the config files. Will update as I go. Keeping these updates short as I have a lot to do with making sure I fully understand the inner workings of this system.

shoot with s16 lenses and theres no need for speed booster.

shoot with s16 lenses and theres no need for speed booster.

is it the NX1? Looks very high res but soft from the nikon 35mm 1.4.

it would not have better center to corner sharpness, it will just be more consistent in the frame with sharpness.

I wouldn't call it that smooth, his camera is all a bit all over the place. And the vertical lines of the building are a worst case scenario especially if you're look for the problem and know how to spot it.
I still think the A6300 has a lot... But I also think RS is one of the more 'overrated' problems with these cameras. The NX1 has 90% as much, yet not so many complainants about it over the last year really. I've heard more people mention the banding.
Yes small improvement.

Still my favourite is the 5D Mark II especially as it is now so affordable used (£650)
Even without the Mosaic AA filter it's a beauty of an image and every bit as good as the 5D Mark III, if not actually even a bit more 'characterful' and less 'clean'!
There's no need to even consider anything newer, they're all far worse... although the 70D with dual pixel AF is quite a lot of fun with raw.
Problem is, the image isn't nearly as good as the 5D Mark II from all those years ago.
80D won't be getting raw any time soon I don't think.
ML probably have moved on a bit to be honest.
Canon had their chance to nurture something great... didn't...

The only canon camera before the 80d that was able to do 1080p 60fps was the 7d mark ii. i think they had trouble cracking it and it was to much trouble to be worth it.
Very true but im not gonna lie, the 5d mark iii raw is stil my favorite digital image out there under 15k.

The only canon camera before the 80d that was able to do 1080p 60fps was the 7d mark ii. i think they had trouble cracking it and it was to much trouble to be worth it.
Very true but im not gonna lie, the 5d mark iii raw is stil my favorite digital image out there under 15k.

The only canon camera before the 80d that was able to do 1080p 60fps was the 7d mark ii. i think they had trouble cracking it and it was to much trouble to be worth it.
Very true but im not gonna lie, the 5d mark iii raw is stil my favorite digital image out there under 15k.

No, just a mic jack. 

Things are looking promising so far. The noise is a little fizzier than Panasonic's, there's more rolling shutter, and the highlights still go a little weird when blown, but it's a damn fine image. A bag of compromises--hard to wrangle LOG mode, limited DR in the modes with good color, limited battery life, no headphone jack, a dearth of good native APS-C lenses, cruddy ergonomics, an LCD screen that doesn't flip out, poor white balance, no 30p without a big crop--but for many people, I can see it being the right mix of compromises. 

Something tells me this camera and the G7 will be our go-to recommendations for most of the year. 
Also interested in this.

Do the A6300's EVF and LCD go dark during 4K like the A7X II's?

People are saying the 1080p 120fps looks soft.
Doesn't look to bad to me...

Also colour in the Vivid profile is very "Fuji-like"
S-LOG may give you dynamic range, but if you want the most effortless out of camera colour just set it to Vivid.
In 120fps with centre-spot AF and enough light to feed the phase-detect pixels it rocks... locks on superbly to what is in the centre of the frame, no hunting.
Dim the light and contrast detect AF kicks in and it's still a bit poo.
Rolling shutter is the biggest issue I have had so far with the 4K 24p.
It's the most I've ever had. Locked down shots no issue but this definitely isn't a tool for violent handheld camera work.
However in the 1080p modes especially 120fps the rolling shutter issues almost disappear...
And 30fps is a BIT better...but crops.

AF in stills mode with Canon lenses on Metabones adapter is mindblowingly fast in good light.
Can't seem to get them to track an object in video mode though.
The Sony lenses track but rather unreliably in low light.
So mixed bag with AF but I am loving the image so far.... seems better than expected... mainly due to NR and codec improvements? The rolling shutter is pretty severe though, like NX1.

Just shot a few tests with the A6300 in 4K.
Sony have completely changed their noise reduction and the way the codec handles noise...
Behold... A fine noise grain in video mode!!

This is really nice to see.
Shot at ISO 6400 by the way.
One thing I have noticed with the copper sensors (X Pro 2, NX1, A6300) is that they really hold onto colour and dynamic range well at high ISOs.
More coming soon.

Maybe you are right.... Personally, I still prefer a beautiful 1080p image to an ok/good 4K image. The amount of activity on the BMMPC thread seems to suggest i'm not alone.
The only reason I sold my 5DIII was the need for 60p... I still regret it every day though and the minute it is possible to get 60p raw, I will buy whichever cam can do it.
Also, talking about sub $10k when the two new models are $1299 and $599 seems a bit pointless.

Awesome test Geoff did - try to guess the lens.
Some are $70,000 glass, some are $600 glass.
http://cinematography.net/CML-CMIR-Lens-Tests.html
Also great article on clinincal glass look vs round - http://yannickkhong.com/blog/2016/2/23/the-problem-with-modern-optics
Partly why I love the Leica R glass so much.

Hahahahaha, best game of this so far

Edit: Image quiality got ruined in the images below so here are some higher res ones. http://imgur.com/a/f509f

 

wow thats amazing, it was a nex 7 with lens turbo and nikkor 50mm 1.4.

Would still call the doctor.

wow thats amazing, it was a nex 7 with lens turbo and nikkor 50mm 1.4.

Bahahaha,so I even was even considering the correct lens  

I don't know what menus are you talking about... My X-Pro1 does not have any..