vas

Damn no 1080P 240fps?

I would rather just pay $30 for one month than go through all the trouble.

You shouldn't have any issues. I've had my gh5 and gh4 out in -15 and lower temperatures for hours on a tripod where the camera and lenses were completely frozen over and didn't have any issues.

I rarely use AF, the rare occasions I use it's on a gimbal, with the OM 12mm f2 and never have issues. The movements are slow and at such a wide angle it works great for when I need it.

It would be hard to move away from a GH5 which has 100% of everything I "need" in a hybrid camera (IBIS, flip screen, 4k 60p, good battery life, usable 6400 iso, 180fps HD, ergonomics, weather sealing, ). At a minimum any camera that would make me leave a GH5 would have to have all these options at a minimum whether it's APSC or FF camera and be under $2500.

4k 60p, IBS, clean ISO 6400, 1080 240fps at high bit rate, and I'm all in.

External recorder to shoot 4K 60P, wtf.

He said there is internal stabilization on the sensor side.

Can't push the 180FPS to much in post it seems. But definitely better than GH4 96FPS

http://www.art-list.io/ I've been using alot. It's a different model in that you pay one fee and can use their whole catalog.

Make sure you have constant preview on.

​This is what I really want out of NAB and keep it under 5k.

My wish list for a AF100 successor: • 10bit 4:2:2 • Up to 4k 60p at high bit rates • Usable iso up to 6400 • ND •13 stop of usable dynamic range • Under $6000

Nice work!

When it comes to faces you either have a budget for a good makeup artist that can deal with HD or you don't. No amount of filters can really deal with pores, acne, blotchy skin etc.. Granted there are people with great skin that can get away with close ups but I don't really see the issue as being 4k or cameras that capture sharp and detailed images.