Jump to content

itimjim

Members
  • Content Count

    129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by itimjim

  1. Panasonic 16:9 AG-LA7200 Anamorphic Lens Adapter - Customised for Wide Lenses I'm selling the much sought after 16:9 converter by Panasonic, which is now typically used on DSLRs shooting 16:9 (1.77) format to make cinemascope (2.66) images - yielding a great cinematic look. This adapter has been modified to remove the built in lens hood on the standard model. This is so the adapter could be used with wide angle lenses, such as the Tokina 11-16 to reduce vignetting. On a standard Micro Four Thirds sensor with a Tokina 11-16 at 11mm, there is no vignetting. GH2 (being slightly wider se
  2. Tokina AT-X Close-up Lens 0.4x Double Achromat 72mm thread This is a VERY RARE double achromat diopter for anamorphic lenses. These are not made any more and really hard to get hold of. This is in A++ condition Allows you to decrease your minimum focus distance when using anamorphic lenses and get in the 4-8 foot sweet spot (talking heads). If you're shooting anamorphic with an adapter lens like ISCO, Kowa, Proskar, Sankor, Bolex, Bell & Howell, then this will transform the quality of those adaptors at the much needed focal distance. Read about it here: http://eoshd.com
  3. PS. Forgot to add. Great video and really nice quality. I think the GH4 struggled a little in some scenes, especially in the highlights. Those Voigtlanders though!! 3D pop in abundance. Just looked at your Baby Hypergonar with the Oly Pen F. The light and content seemed even nicer in this one. I don't think the Hypergonar can hold a candle to hanging on to resolution like the Bolex though. The think I was always find amazing with the Bolex, is you can use it wide open on all lenses with no discernible loss of sharpness (except in the taking lens). Thanks for sharing. Nice results.
  4. Interesting choice using 4:3 mode with a 1.5x anamorphic, as it'll give a 2.0 aspect ratio. I've previously shot 16:9 at 1.5x, yielding 2.66 ratio. It looks super wide, and is quite pleasant, although there's always the temptation to crop the edges a little to bring it into the more common 2.39/2.40. I might have to do some tests shooting 3:2 4K photo burst with my GX8, as 2.25 with a little horizontal crop probably yields the most over all resolution. Having said that, the far edges of the Bolex when you're pushing it close to the vignette (50-56mm EFL) probably benefit from a little edge cro
  5. I love my Moeller 16/32/1.5 that much, I might be buried with it. You can keep your Iscos thanks.
  6. I must have about 30 lenses. I only ever use Canon FDs on set though, unless I have to go super wide, when I break out a Tokina 11-16....I don't like it though.
  7. Eris You are right. When you start hitting the very far edges of the Bolex, it starts to distort. Not a problem locked down, but distracting otherwise, and pain ugly on pans. I use my 16/32 with a set of FDs and I love the look. Quite simply the best rendering anamorphic I've seen and used, even ISCO. So much resolving power and a natural low contrast effect that can help a lot of digital artifacts. I'd be interested to know where you got your lens calibrated.
  8. ​Almost the same here, but I don't print. I shoot a mixture of film cameras, some really oddball ones, and just scan using a flatbed. My current favourite is a Franka Solida I from the US occupied zone of West Germany in 1956. Love it. Zorki, Zenit, Canon AE, Holgas, too...love them all. Recently added a 120 Consul Coronet too.
  9. Let me get this right. The new aspect ratios are just further crops than the 16:9? Or at least on Seb's video test the chin to head vertical angle of view looked the same. So in theory it actually offers no further image enhancement, just time saving in post not having to chop off the edges - but then at the same time it doesn't give you the flexibility to recompose horizontally. Am I right?
  10. The Bolex 16/32/1.5x is just incredible. It's that good, I will probably request to be buried with it, in the remotest chance that I can take it through with me to the afterlife. :-)
  11. 100% GH4. Using 4k acquisition for 2k delivery using anamorphic allows you to trim and conform the 2.66 (1.5x) or 3.55 (2x) to 2.39 with very little resolution loss.
  12. Based on the opinions of a lot of people over at bmcuser, the Tiffen VariND can be a poor chice for some cameras and generally a bit muddy. The BMCs have a lot of problems with IR. Heliopan are held in high regard. I currently use Formatt Hitec multistop on my GH2 with good results. Not tested enough on the BMCC yet.
  13. Agreed with Kowa 16H/8Z (same lens). This thing is just screaming for a camera to come out with a great 4:3 shooting mode. Currently 3.66 is just too stretched for my liking. However, I'm keen to test out with a GH4 at 4k for 2k delivery. Until then, 1.5x is the best for my tastes.
  14. Thanks for bringing my attention to bandcamp.com, looks great. However, I don't see any literature that states the artists wouldn't have any issue with using their work as part of fair use. Love the fact the proceeds go to the artist, but does it give the amateur content creator any more options?
  15. I use MFT Speedbooster, Canon FD and Bolex 16/32/1.5x. Don't have access to Isco though. What do you want to know? Any quick tests?
  16. Depends on the anamorphic and the taking lens. My Bolex 16/32/1.5x is usable with Canon 28/2 on MFT (although vignette at infinity on GH2 with multiaspect sensor). My Kowa Prominar 2x is best with the FD 35/2. 28mm is my favourite FL on MFT with anamorphic, 35mm + 0.71 speedbooster on BMCC.
  17. GH4 and MFT BMCC with Speedboosters for me. Full frame is a great look but that's all it is, a look. It seems to be treated as some form of mystic nirvana and is regularly abused.
  18. Just looked. Where does it say the price. I can't see an article.
  19. £1,300 with the Tokina ATX +0.4 Achromat Dioptre...I have the same combination and it's beautiful. Even if it doubled in value from £1,300....you'd have to prise it out of my cold dead hands :). Good luck with buying one, they are magnificent.
  20. It's $999. Definitely interesting to some, not for me though, too much bulk, irrespective of the improved workflow.
  21. I must be missing something, but the current mFT speedbooster at 0.71x is almost spot on to S35 as it is. mFT sensor size imaging area width = 17.3mm Add standard speedbooster (0.71x), equivalent of = 24.37mm S35 imaging area width = 24.9mm So are they going to make a 0.69x speedbooster? Makes little sense. Unless they're fading the 0.71x out and just replacing with an uprated design. Dedicated to GH4 doesn't sound right though.
  22. I have the bigger Moeller (16/32/1.5x) and I wouldn't swap it for the most pristine copy of any Iscorama ever. I'm getting buried with this thing :)
  23. Baby Isco, but the quality is no where near up to scratch compared to its bigger siblings. If you can live without dual focus (I certainly can) then the best quality small adapter is the Bolex Moller 8/19/1.5x, simply incredible images.
×
×
  • Create New...