Emanuel

As every tool in filmmaking, content, production values and the shooter to know how to raise the craft with the available tools still count ; ) Reason why fancy computational photography will bring more stuff like this or that (mute it!) when explored within its limits such as here or there... or yet contained in this article on their 'cinematic mode' but not to necessarily fit every single case for sure : X besides it is more prone to fail than the reverse. Side by side as 'the' new cinematic game changer camera -- herein, the official Whodunnit beyond the Kathryn Bigelow's Hollywood In Your Pocket (BTS here) or/and some other unofficial fragile attempts, when not backed by the brand nor talented craftspeople using the tools as audience standards blatantly stand. Here's why this replaces next to nothing. There's always how to tune it more accordingly in any way whatsoever. To my liking, the lack of 4K 120fps nowadays is a deal breaker -- my OnePlus 9 Pro adds it to the cinematic mode aka portrait mode or still the option to lock the exposure too! That said, main camera's low light top performance already seen from that Taipei sample, coupled to 10-bit 4:2:2 ProRes in this Toronto footage, I guess, or the Big Apple, among many others for sure, clearly put it at a higher bar even though not at the (pristine) ZV-E10 level, no doubt that both are the typical no-brainer. - EAG

Love the Brits Part II: ...their music and approach to everything related to stuff they pioneer about, such as this web corner is : ) (BTW just arrived to UK residency so who knows one of these days I had to write we ? ;- )

Love the Brits:

What a sweet gadget, had no idea about its existence, irresistible order :- )

That's an amazing camera, used for this piece brilliant shot with, a British feature film I produced in 2013: EAG :- )

They're used to let shills (like this one when not manufacturer demos such as here) to infer they "review" them. For that price, I couldn't help myself and pulled the trigger. I can publish here a test as soon as I'll have it in my hands. Indemand now as predicted.

Well, surely not the lightest unless to your wallet ; ) ...but there are other differences comparing with its closer competitor SliderMini 2 (impressive load capacity BTW) Any others?

What about that? 9 hours left... Comes from here: ...but seems to deserve its own thread ;- )

Found this, 11 hours to go on IGG before to become available (or not) through indemand route, I suppose, in any case I wonder how many from you have any thoughts about? More EOSHD valuable info on topic here and there.

£2500 (+ specs, etc.) on CVP

The major point is small cameras are changing the cinema and its aesthetics... since the beginning of the second half of the last century : X

I can even-fully-understand... ...be with you ...and follow the (digital) mantra : ) though, every form factor has a magic of its own... ;- ) - EAG

Ditto. No idea why they miss 4K 120fps anyway... Had to buy the €700 OnePlus 9 Pro instead. without mention my 2020 ASUS Zenfone 7 Pro without locking the exposure at that frame rate though : ( https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_13_pro-11102.php

It's coming from here: Any thoughts? Poll has no none option, so whether you choose one or another, or yet none, you're welcome to tell your readers why or anything else you want on topic :- )

PS (5 minutes is too short to add anything to a post anyway : ) At EF end there are good glass samples so I believe you won't need to worry too much about (focus on the leftover instead ; ) it's just to know how to choose the best tools to fit your cup -- here's a good resource (Bryan Carnathan is your host) where you can compare a variety of options you have: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/

That can not even be called a problem at all... : ) It will just charge more time from you @ post going along the Pocket series route taking from you the caution enough by framing if your glass won't meet your distortion standards :- )

Yes, there are tools for motion picture much more affordable today :- )

Great post as usual, man, yeah I'd call P4K old school where more effort you have to put to overcome the lack of modern tools, a bit as much as happens with AF as for instance you've surpassed with your incredible tool all Pocket series owners must have (EAG :- )

Modern digital photography usually provides the option of lens correction by software, not available going with a typical cinema camera such as Pocket series is :- ) https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/infobank/in-camera-lens-corrections/ https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/lens-corrections.htm - EAG

Good advices, mate : ) Incrediblly funny how old LX100 is, isn't it? ; ) Seven years in the digital camera industry is a whole eternity... and my 4x G7s, one year younger as for instance, are still unbeatable in price, weight and form factor vs the IQ they STILL and will always offer! EAG :- )

Thanks man, your news and focus are really appreciated over here, lad : ) Same size and dimensions then? From third parties offer I hope too! Seems they know what they're doing and very likely a couple of units coming from US subscription where there's no VAT, 20% better foreign exchange without mention a much lower price in fact ;- )

Just arrived finally to be an alternative to the RAVPower's Filehub? https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/lambogo-rugged-high-speed-wireless-ssd-storage/x/4309913#/ Well, 320MB/s against 12MB/s-18MB/s, roughly 20x faster seems too irresistible and a dream come true... a new age coming? Imagine to backup your 128GB SD footage in... 7 minutes ; ) I wonder how consistent the speed be going with 8TB, figure it full of data loading there... Interesting price range anyway. Affordable to say it in one word. Feel tempted to test it :- )

Looks like incredible, man, kudos to both of you (EAG :- )

It was a rhetorical question anyway : ) we are all limited to weight of the bird in one or another way... :- )

Well seen but as written up there, I think because RED is going towards a different target this time : ) that is, not exactly as not expected at least :- )