sandro

So it seems that bad quality at high ISO is not the bitrate but the NR inside the camera.

Anyone tried if there any improvement on 3200 ISO and beyond with higher bitrate?

1 minute ago, MountneerMan said:

let me be the first to say THANK YOU! The download site does not appear to be working. likely because a bunch of people are trying at the same time lol.

Just out of curiosity what is the original Mbit/sec of the NX1?

Pro is 80Mbit but with that script it seems you can go till 320mbit.

We don't even know if the nx1 benchmarks does random or sequential reads. Or if it's threaded. It's complicated.

yup and even though size will raise a lot it doesn't matter since sd card are so cheap right now

ok thanks... anyway don't be offended but isn't time limit removal the last of our concerns right now? I can't find a reason to use such a powerful cinematic tool to record for such a long time

I wonder why internal storage is so slow...what if we try to enable swapping on the sd card? with fastest cards it shouldn't be a problem I guess

hasn't someone tried to solve this corrupted file thing disabling power saving mode in the dev menu? maybe I've dreamed about it

there must be a point when even hevc shows fine details right?

I wonder what happens with ISO higher than 1600 with this bitrate.

4 minutes ago, mike_tee_vee said:

Any chance for a magnify focus option while recording video with legacy glass?

That should be pretty easy to do.

I will check this out when on the computer and I will post my samples

I was testing out high iso raw stills in the dark and I noticed that I always get two different blue lines at high ISO at the bottom of the image always in the same position. The same lines I get when recording video from iso 3200 that I've been reporting and that some people don't see. Also my 18-200 is doing weird things since it misses focus for stationary objects too much (back or front focusing) and when used continuously it causes "freezes" in the EVF while I zoom in and out... sometimes it completely stops working and the camera won't shoot at all. So I'm sending both to warranty...my question is we all got that lenses are replaced all together since they don't repair them...what will happen with camera body though? Will it replaced as well even if they're discontinued or they will try to fix it or give me a refurbished one?

Anyway does anyone have the problems I described with both the camera and lens?

19 minutes ago, BrorSvensson said:

Youtubes copyright system is so awfull though. People claming videos that are not even theres and videos that dont violate copyright laws.

At least you can use use copyrighted music on there since the major monetizes on videos. I couldn't upload my last videos on vimeo since they got deleted immediately.

39 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:

Going to get mine on Thursday now, Sony had a delivery technical issue so they are coming in a few days late here.

Looking forward to it.

I do wish Sony would change their menus, ergonomics, skintones, colour, LOG profile, jello, banding, macroblocking, edge tearing, etc. quite a long list isn't it? You can be assured my coverage won't be a PR smoothie unlike ALL OTHER SITES SEEMINGLY IN EXISTENCE.

Can I just say that Sony have some SUPERB PR people.

we'll see how it compares side by side in low light with the nx1

the 16-50 price raised by a lot..Im using the nx1 for stills with af and I must say I miss the optical viewfinder both for the quality and the af missing a lot of shots

10 minutes ago, Arizona Sunset said:

Are you sure?  

This makes me think, G7's big brother, not A7S II's little brother (the noise starts dancing around everywhere, shadows, highlights, etc, right at ISO 3200 - this is not as a good as the R II in s35 mode even):

 

OK but compared to the NX1 is way ahead, I mean 12800 is decent, NX1's 3200 stars being unusable.

1 hour ago, Arizona Sunset said:

Inside of ISO 1600, they will be similar.   The NX1 video degrades at 3200, whereas the A6300 seems to degrade at 6400.   This is not the case for stills.  

I have an NX1, and A6000, and they are totally different cameras.  The NX1 is a joy to shoot with, higher hit rate on shallow depth of field, easy to use and fun to interact with. 

My opinion?  As good as the A6300 is, the NX1 retains APS-C champion hybrid status for 2 more years.  The only competition will be from the GH5 with 4k 60fps, if they can pull it off, which they will have to do remain in the game. 

Are you sure the a6300 degrades from 6400? The sample from cinema 5d shows much more than that!

Apparently the a6300 wins by a lot in low light.

I wish it can fixed but i really have doubts. Why would a nr bring blue lines? It seems more like something produced by electronics/hardware than a software thing.

I seriously don't get they the nx1 is do bad in lowlight while the a6300 can do this 

I mean there something wrong with the sensor design or we really need to remove that NR.

2 hours ago, iamoui said:

https://www.cinema5d.com/sony-a6300-low-light-test-video-a-mini-a7s-ii-for-much-less/

Wow... how come the NX1 can't even do good 3200?

11 hours ago, Otto K said:

Well, for NX500 it seems CPU freq is from 100MHz to 800MHz:

[[email protected] debug]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq  
800000

[[email protected] debug]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
100000

Someone with NX1 could see what's there.

I need the telnet software to test.

53 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said:

I can sell you two Nikkor f1.4

which ones?

1 minute ago, SMGJohn said:

I literally had a very hard time seeing it, I tried using one white and one purple background to spot them sadly my Canon 400D is too old to shoot fast enough in the dark had to use my Xperia Z.

No idea what is going on in photo mode, but in movie mode they are visible somewhat at least I think it is what you mean. Its hard to take pictures of it though

yes these are the ones.

3 hours ago, mercer said:

Looks great Bror. Beautiful lens and composition, but I am a sucker for slow rack focusing. What camera did you shoot that with?

If you already have the Nikkor 35mm f2, then why are you even looking for another lens in this range... Get some more Nikkors... How about the 50mm 1.2 or 85mm f2... Or the 20mm f2.8? There are so many great Nikkor lenses that you should be concentrating on building a nice set of those... IMO. 

I need more light and nikkors are not cheap...