newfoundmass

I believe EposVox on YouTube said Z Cam was going to be sending him a copy to review.

I can definitely see better cameras coming out in the next year for under $1000, though none that do 120fps in 4K. But I'd consider it too at that price.

Anyone here taking a chance on this?

Pre orders are open. It'll be interesting to see this possibly in capable hands, given how meh the footage Z Cam has released. I don't have high hopes, but we'll see.

I know Caleb Pike is in the process of working on a video that covers this.

I think, for the money, SLR Magic anamorphic lenses look fine. You get what you pay for, really, which in this case is acceptable. Renting nicer lenses for the cost of what you'd pay to own the SLR Magic ones, unless you're on a larger budget film, doesn't really make sense to me. If you're going to get enough use out of them, then buy them and then sell them in a couple years when you're (hopefully) in a better position. For real indie films, music videos, etc. it makes a ton of more sense vs. renting.

These days IS is so good that it doesn't matter for a lot of cameras. I've left it on accidentally and it was fine. HOWEVER it's good practice, and worth playing it safe, to turn it off.

Thanks for the review @KnightsFan!

Doesn't h.265 require even more processing power than h.264?

Even for bloggers though, 5 minutes is way too short. Or getting video of your kid playing soccer.

The only issue with getting a Windows system is that @Anaconda_ might be a FCPX user. I've considered building a Hackintosh (or finding someone to make one for me since I've never done it before) for my next system. I know the rumor is that, with Apple bringing processor manufacturing in-house, Hackintoshes might not be possible in a few years, but with Apple not having released a iMac upgrade in over a year (and iMac Pros are way out of my budget) and the latest MacBook Pro having issues with keyboards, etc. the ability to have a Mac with better specs than anything Apple has available and for a fraction of the price is a very tempting thing, even with some of the issues with system updates.

GH5 IBIS really is good, I don't think you'll really miss out much compared to the G9 in that department.

Probably not. That's a ten year old graphics card and it's only a dual core processor. HOWEVER you may be able to have OWC upgrade the processor and graphics cards for a couple hundred dollars.

Chris and Jordan got the overheating warning after 2 minutes and it shut off completely after shooting off and on after 8 minutes ?

Yeah I wouldn't expect a GH6 until 2020 at the earliest. I also think the A7S III could also be a year or more away. Usually there's some info in the months leading up to a camera's release that gets leaked and so far there has been nothing. That'd seem to indicate to me that, at the earliest, it'll come out the winter of 2019 but even then I'm quite skeptical. Honestly there's not really much of a reason not to get the A7 III, A7S II, G9, GH5s or the GH5 right now. I know we all kinda get gear lust and want the latest gear, but all of those cameras, and indeed most of the cameras in use today, all will be perfectly good tools for years to come. I personally would probably not get the G9 if my primary use is for video given there are more video centered options available, however it's still very much a capable video camera that will shoot beautiful 4K for years to come.

I guess I'm not understanding why you'd get the camera because of it's lighter weight only to then add a monitor, which then negates its lighter weight?

BMD would KILL to "miss the mark" like the GH5 did ha ha.

The camera hasn't even been released! Who knows how good the auto focus will be? What'd you expect from BMD? And Panasonic missed the mark so badly with the GH5 that it won camera of the year awards and seems to have sold really, really well. ?

Based on Sony's current mirrorless offerings there definitely does seem to be a tech barrier. You're right. For some reason I thought it only had HD. I could've sworn Max Yuryev went to the premier and that it could only shoot 1080p and didn't have s-log. Again though, it is a camera marketed for photography with features that appeal to photographers, specifically double in burst mode which isn't a minor difference for photographers. They were also released almost a year apart. We'll see. Again we have no real idea what to expect, but I think it's a taller order than you think to record 4K 60p internal unless there is a major breakthrough in the processing. That MAY be why it's been in development for longer than people expected? I think it's very possible, even likely, that it outputs 4K 60p but internally? Who knows. I feel like you put way too much emphasis on 60p and auto focus. I think @Shirozina makes a good point, I think 10 bit and a higher bit rate is just as important to many shooters.

Bless your heart @wolf33d, you're a very optimistic person! I kinda doubt the A7S III will have internal 4K 60p unless they have some giant breakthrough in processing to prevent overheating. I think people really don't understand how big of an achievement it was that the GH5 was able to do this in camera and implement it so well. It's not an easy feat in such a small body. And the FS5 mk II is relevant because it was just announced, is a professional cinema camera, and didn't include 4K 60p. There's more of a reason to include it in that camera than there is for the A7S III. The A9 is a stills camera that has basic video features. It's not marketed for hybrid and video shooters, which should be apparent given it only does 1080p. Comparing its video features to the A7III doesn't make sense. Part of the reason people are drawing blanks on what Sony could have in store for the A7S III is because there's a limit to what they can do based on the tech. They already push their cameras to the limit given the tech in them, so it feels like, to achieve a lot of people's requests, they're going to need to have some kind of breakthrough. It's reasonable to expect that they have something big, but how big and what the implications could be are completely unknown.

No need to be rude.

I will never forgive phone makers for allowing video to be shot in portrait mode.

I'm going to guess they mean 50% lower than competing companies like SLR Magic maybe?

Never purchased a used CAMERA from Adorama, but I've purchased used lenses, mics, etc. from them (and B&H) and have never had a problem. They're a great company, from my experiences, and often have nice little deals. I will say I'm partial to B&H as when I purchased a used lav mic from them and received it, I had to add padding to the battery door because the door wasn't pushing the battery down hard enough to power on the mic. While not a HUGE deal, since it worked still, I figured I'd return it and just buy a new/different one. They told me to keep it, refunded my money, and I bought a new one, giving me two of the same mics which was great because I intended to buy a second lav mic anyway once I'd found a decent one!

We have, we're just not interested in paying double the price for it!