Jump to content

Stathman

Members
  • Content Count

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stathman


  1.  

    2 hours ago, thephoenix said:

    actually it is wrong. color magement will convert to any output you want and you can change it when you want and rcm is non destructive.

     

    Yes, of course you can use rcm.

    I was just following the previews posts and my point was about the correct way to apply the lut.

    You can use REC.2100 HLG as an input in rcm.


  2. 38 minutes ago, thephoenix said:

    how do you setup resolve color management input for xt3 hlg footage ?

    Correct me if I'm wrong, i think the correct way to do it is to use the preferred "HLG to xxx Lut" as a 3d output lut so any further corrections happening before the lut is applied to the image.

    fAO8qCP.png


  3. 8 minutes ago, androidlad said:

    Nice. I think you got the shutter speed mixed up though?

    Yep! Fixed it, thanks.

    I prefer HLG, I have to test it on skin tones though.

    Also liked the LUTCalc's Rec709 lut better than Alexa X2 but I had to set black level to -6 for better results.


  4. Following @androidlad's findings i did some tests trying to decide which to choose, Flog or HLG.

    Camera Settings:

    FLOG: ISO 640 - SHUTTER 2000 - WB 5300K - F8

    HLG: ISO 1000 - SHUTTER 3200 - WB 5300K - F8

    Both shots exposed with Multi Metering aiming at 0 on the display meter.

    Here are the results:

     

    FLOG CLEAN

    0YSEEjU.jpg

    yK0QrrI.png

     

     HLG CLEAN

    yxGJXEp.jpg

    WMMB49O.png

     

    FLOG + FUJIFILM FLOG to WDR BT.709 LUT

    SuqR8pg.jpg

    TNa2WxZ.png

     

    HLG + LUTCalc HLG to ALEXA X2 LUT

    sVKNIOO.jpg

    n67xf04.png

     

    HLG + LUTCalc HLG Rec709 LUT

    hrdtNwN.jpg

    6MwyO25.png

     

    FLOG + FUJIFILM FLOG to WDR BT.709 LUT + MINOR EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENTS

    qqS2Zlb.jpg

    xEQyPsL.png

     

    HLG + LUTCalc HLG Rec709 LUT + MINOR EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENTS

    6G5uXvd.jpg

    uPl90Am.png

     

     

    You can download the original files if you want.

    https://we.tl/t-1qqI0lonhz


  5. 4 hours ago, DBounce said:

    I owned both and favored the S, not just for the better low-light performance, but also for the absence of IBIS. I disliked the wobble that the IBIS could produce. It ruined enough of my shots to make the trade off not worth it for my use.

    Nikon did better by allowing the option to have the VR (IBIS in Nikon speak) physically lock when not in use.

    I believe you can turn off ibis on gh5 also.

    Ibis.thumb.png.2e49ff0e52f2f26794e6921fb9772f71.png

     


  6. After some more tests on after effects I have found that this settings gives me the most accurate results:

    1. Enable "Use Display Color Management"

    2. Prepare your work in Rec.790 Gamma 2.4 color space

    3. Just before rendering switch the working space to sRGB 2.1

    4. The exported ProRes file will look almost identical to the preview you get on Rec709 working space. Just with a negligible exposure shift.

    On.png

×
×
  • Create New...